Okay, I think I solved my own problem. I have Gerben Wierda's teTeX
distribution installed and this distribution includes a ghostscript 6.01
installation (in /usr/local/share and /usr/local/bin). Because
/usr/local/bin occurs before /sw/bin in my PATH variable, Wierda's
ghostscript is being
Hi there,
just to let you know that my Fink installation (sw tree) is on a
different partition (/Volumes/Apps/sw in my case) but have a /sw
symlink on the OS X system partition. I have this since 4 months now
and had no glitches whatsoever (ever).
It's not a fix in that it looks like it is
Hi,
* Matt Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12.08.02 08:30]wrote:
I'm after some feedback on the following packages:
freeciv-1.13.0-1
freeciv gives the following error:
$ sudo fink install freeciv
Information about 1316 packages read in 0 seconds.
pkg freeciv version ###
pkg freeciv
Massimo Marino wrote:
Hi there,
just to let you know that my Fink installation (sw tree) is on a
different partition (/Volumes/Apps/sw in my case) but have a /sw symlink
on the OS X system partition. I have this since 4 months now and had no
glitches whatsoever (ever).
It's not a fix
Provided eterm is actually installed the following will work
# Don't touch anything above here ---
# The following four lines (starting with 'set') are the
# only ones you need to change...
# NAME OF APPLICATION EXECUTABLE/COMMAND GOES HERE
set appname=eterm
#
On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 03:39 PM, Matt Stephenson wrote:
I'm after some feedback on the following packages:
freeciv-1.13.0-1
builds and runs... a few Gtk-CRITICAL **: showed up in the terminal
sometime during gameplay, but didn't noticeably affect the game.
everything seemed to
Indeed,
thanks Martin to precise the conditio sine qua non. My setup is indeed
as you describe: Fink knows its installation as being on /sw
Massimo
On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 02:11 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Massimo Marino wrote:
Hi there,
just to let you know that my Fink
I downloaded the latest(version 4.2.0-11, Mon Aug 12) xfree86-base and
-rootless and KDE is working again, thanks!!! The build and install took
about 90 minutes on my iBook(G3 700 256Mb RAM) - no problems. Gnome is
running fine as well.
However, I'm now experiencing another, less drastic
Have you tried rebuilding mosfet-liquid?
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 12:57, Dylan Foley wrote:
I downloaded the latest(version 4.2.0-11, Mon Aug 12) xfree86-base and
-rootless and KDE is working again, thanks!!! The build and install took
about 90 minutes on my iBook(G3 700 256Mb RAM) - no
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 11:57, Dylan Foley wrote:
However, I'm now experiencing another, less drastic problem. It seems
that the mosfet-liquid package is no longer working. I get a lot of
messages like the following in my kde start up log:
QSettings::sync: filename is null/empty
Conflict
I've been using Fink quite happily for a while. I recently updated to
0.10 with fink selfupdate, then tried to update all my packages with
fink update-all. The process halted partway through with the following
error:
Unpacking gnome-libs-shlibs (from .../gnome-libs-
Somehow my fink and apt-get config files must have gotten out of sync.
Fink update-all reports a long list of packages to update and install,
but apt-get upgrade does nothing at all. I've checked the
/sw/etc/fink.conf and /sw/etc/apt/sources.list files, and there's
nothing obviously wrong
I've had the same problem on other packages when they go from just a
single package to a splitoff one--e.g. one that also makes a -shlibs
package, because the same file looks like it is part of two packages.
One option is to manually install gnome-libs-shlibs and forcibly
overwrite the file from
This isn't a problem with your system. fink update shows new package
versions because they have been updated in the _source_ distribution.
However, the _binary_ distribution probably hasn't been updated in a
while, so you won't have any version updates via apt-get upgrade.
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 12:59, Ravi Pandya wrote:
Somehow my fink and apt-get config files must have gotten out of sync.
Fink update-all reports a long list of packages to update and install,
but apt-get upgrade does nothing at all. I've checked the
/sw/etc/fink.conf and
please read the FAQ on the fink website at fink.sourceforge.net under
source vs binary dist.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somehow my fink and apt-get config files must have gotten out of sync.
Fink update-all reports a long list of packages to update and install,
but apt-get upgrade does nothing
Title: 'gzip is not the right format' error
When I run fink selfupdate ,
Fink connects to fink.sourceforge.net and displays the following error:
-
A new Fink distribution release is available. I will now download the
this looks like a bzip2 line
bzip2 -dc foo.tar.bz2 | tar -xf -
gzip files like foo.tar.gz are extracted like this
tar -xzf foo.tar.gz
the z tells tar that the file is also gziped and you don't have to call
gunzip directly this way.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gzip -dc packages-0.4.0.tar.gz |
Thanx.
Is there any way to configure fink to use the right (gzip/Tar) command?
Now I will have to continue the install update procedure manually, and that
might prove a bit tricky for me.
Thanx,
Piet
Justin Hallett wrote:
this looks like a bzip2 line
bzip2 -dc foo.tar.bz2 | tar -xf -
fink should never have issued that command. If it did there is likely
something wrong with your fink installing. And you should wait for
someone else to help you, since you where installing fink-0.10 I finigured
it was a new isntall and you issued that command.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanx.
I now have this issue and will be looking into it, my next question is are
you on 10.1 or jag?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
** (gftp-gtk:23197): WARNING **: Couldn't load font Sans 10 falling back
to Sans 10
** (gftp-gtk:23197): WARNING **: Couldn't load font Sans 10 falling back
to Sans 10
**
I get this as well which to me looks like a glib issue, still looking
deeper.
GLib: Cannot convert message: Conversion from character set 'UTF-8' to
'en_US' is not supported
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I now have this issue and will be looking into it, my next question is are
you on 10.1 or jag?
On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 05:54 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
fink should never have issued that command. If it did there is likely
something wrong with your fink installing. And you should wait for
someone else to help you, since you where installing fink-0.10 I finigured
it was a new
I suppose this one has been asked before but can't find a solution
Samba seems available in the Fink - packages database but if I use
apt-get it wan't find it.
If I type fink list it wan't find it either.
Everything else works just great.
Herebelow is my (standard) source.list
# Default
I've been unable to compile AbiWord 1.0.2 (unstable branch). It always
fails with the following:
Making all in src
cd .. /bin/sh ./config.status src/GNUmakefile
config.status: creating src/GNUmakefile
Making all in tools
cd ../.. /bin/sh ./config.status src/tools/GNUmakefile
config.status:
fink remove audiofile and see what happens. I've
gotten the node exists before and removing the pkg worked.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs
[fooBar:/sw/bin] root# mtr
dyld: mtr Undefined symbols:
mtr undefined reference to _stdscr expected to be defined in
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
Trace/BPT trap
[fooBar:/sw/bin] root# which mtr
/sw/sbin/mtr
--
has anyone else run into this in the binary distribution of fink?
piet dierickx wrote:
The problem was indeed a tar file wich wasn't really a tar file, but a html
page. The page was a script asking wich mirror to use for downloading
blah.tar.gz ( http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fink/ )
You should read some of fink's web pages on the subject of bindist
28 matches
Mail list logo
