[Fink-users] xfree86-base-threaded

At 2002-09-16 20:22, Alexander Strange wrote: >Won't work. Follow the instructions on >http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jag-bootstrap.php Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: rm -rf /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-threaded-4.2.0.1-2 mkdir -p /usr/l

[Fink-users] 10.2 Xfree building errors (rman?)

following instructions for upgrading fink , i got errors when building xfree : rm -f rman /usr/bin/cc -o rman -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -no-cpp-precomp rman.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib ld: Undefined symbols: ___eprintf gnumake[6]: *** [rman] Error 1 okay, continuing in doc/man/GLU rm -f gluBeginC

Re: [Fink-users] Anacron: computer prevented from going to sleep

On Monday, September 16, 2002, at 07:03 PM, Andreas Gschwendtner wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Sorry if I am a little bit OT, as my questions are not really > concerning fink but cron and anacron. > > 1) After installing anacron on 10.2 (it was automatically installed > with findutils and I also

[Fink-users] xfree86-base

At 2002-09-17 01:01, I wrote: >Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: xfree86-base has the same problem: rm -rf /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-4.2.0.1-2 mkdir -p /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-4.2.0.1-2/usr/local/finksw mkdir -p /usr/loc

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base-threaded

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 04:01 , Ashley Yakeley wrote: > At 2002-09-16 20:22, Alexander Strange wrote: > >> Won't work. Follow the instructions on >> http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jag-bootstrap.php > > Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: ... > /us

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base-threaded

On mardi, sep 17, 2002, at 10:01 Europe/Paris, Ashley Yakeley wrote: > Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: > mv: rename > /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-base-threaded-4.2.0.1-2/usr/local/ > finksw > /../Applications to > /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-roo

[Fink-users] abiword - anyone got it to compile

Trying to install abiword on my 10.1.5 system. selfupdated fink and did an update all. When I try to install abiword,I get a compilation error (3 levels down, just after 'Making all in xp', I get "GNUMakefile:189: *** missing separator. Stop."). Is it just me, or is anyone else seeing this. Is

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Install Octave: Dependency on "zlib"

See the fink-users thread on "zlib problem." zlib is a part of Mac OS 10.2, so it is no longer a part of fink (for 10.2). I edited the hdf5 info file to remove the dependency on zlib and that got me past the dependency issue. Still working on the compile (no errors yet, it's just taking awhi

RE: [Fink-users] abiword - anyone got it to compile

Michael, > > I have been able to successful compile abiword both under > 10.1.5 and now under > 10.2, latest version of Fink, > > pkg fink version ### > pkg fink version 0.10.0.cvs-20020914.1536 > > fink-0.10.0.cvs-20020914.1536: The Fink package manager I just ran 'fink selfupdate-cvs',

[Fink-users] 10.2 packages on 10.1 -- was: abiword - anyone got it to compile

> I just ran 'fink selfupdate-cvs', 'fink update-all' (which says > there is nothing to update i.e . everything is up to date) then > 'fink describe fink' and I get... > > pkg fink version ### > pkg fink version 0.10.0-1 > > Why am I getting numbers different from yours? Because he is running

[Fink-users] Can Gtk2 replace Gtk?

I was wondering why Gtk1 is required when Gtk2 is installed ? Would it be possible to make Gtk2 provide Gtk? -- Sébastien -- «Life begins at the centerfold and expands outward.» -- Miss November, 1966 --

Re: [Fink-users] Can Gtk2 replace Gtk?

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 06:01 AM, Sébastien Pierre wrote: > I was wondering why Gtk1 is required when Gtk2 is installed ? Would it > be possible to make Gtk2 provide Gtk? > No, it is a different API. Apps need to be rewritten for gtk2. -Ben

[Fink-users] 10.2 and Python, r-base

Hello, list. I wrote yesterday about problems with compiling Python. The problem has not been solved; Jeff Whitaker is stumped and has asked that I query the group again. To recap, here is what happens during Python compile: (snip) gcc -L/sw/lib -bundle -bundle_loader python.exe build/temp.darw

[Fink-users] test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please ignore, my posts don't seem to be going through. - -- A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in. --Kim Alm, a.s.r -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9hz4REHLN/FXAbC0RAtLUAKDHG7

Re: [Fink-users] 10.2 and Python, r-base

On mardi, sep 17, 2002, at 16:23 Europe/Paris, Cunningham Andy wrote: > Hello, list. > > I wrote yesterday about problems with compiling Python. The problem > has not > been solved; Jeff Whitaker is stumped and has asked that I query the > group > again. To recap, here is what happens during Py

[Fink-users] Qt3 ibrary issues

Hello everyone. I am trying to compile qCAD from source. One of its link dependencies is Qt 3 library. The Makefile is looking for a qt3library with a ".a" extension but the most recent (unstable) fink qt3 package does not create one. Does anyone know whether or not I can substitute one of t

Re: [Fink-users] Qt3 ibrary issues

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 11:32, Sean Burke wrote: > Hello everyone. > I am trying to compile qCAD from source. One of its link dependencies > is Qt 3 library. The Makefile is looking for a qt3library with a ".a" > extension but the most recent (unstable) fink qt3 package does not > create one.

Re: [Fink-users] 10.2 and Python, r-base

Le mardi, 17 sep 2002, à 16:23 Europe/Paris, Cunningham Andy a écrit : > Hello, list. > > I wrote yesterday about problems with compiling Python. The problem > has not > been solved; Jeff Whitaker is stumped and has asked that I query the > group > again. To recap, here is what happens during

[Fink-users] mplayer source code moved?

curl -f -L -O http://ftp.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/MPlayer-0.90pre6.tar.bz2 curl: (22) The requested file was not found --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Deve

[Fink-users] fink list shows only 18 packages

After performing the installation of the latest fink according to fink.soruceforge.net/news/jag-bootstrap.php "fink list" shows only the 18 packages which are part of the base system. I invoked also a "fink index" but nothing changed. What I did indetail: - I fetched the fink via cvs, - then I

[Fink-users] Openssl Zlib dependency not removed

I am running the experimental Fink for Mac OS 10.2 and have just tried to update my installation with 'fink selfupdate-cvs' followed by 'fink update-all'. The latter command failed with the following messages: WARNING: While resolving dependency "zlib" for package "openssl-0.9.6g-1", package "z

Re: [Fink-users] fink list shows only 18 packages

On mardi, sep 17, 2002, at 19:28 Europe/Paris, Dirk Taggesell wrote: > How can I access the numerous additional packages? fink selfupdate-cvs -- Martin --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Tec

Re: [Fink-users] Openssl Zlib dependency not removed

Sorry, this morning a bunch of packages were put in 10.2 that were not tested apparently. Fixing. -Ben On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Alwyn wrote: > I am running the experimental Fink for Mac OS 10.2 and have just tried > to update my installation with 'fink selfupdate-cvs' fol

Re: [Fink-users] Openssl Zlib dependency not removed

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Alwyn wrote: > I am running the experimental Fink for Mac OS 10.2 and have just tried > to update my installation with 'fink selfupdate-cvs' followed by 'fink > update-all'. The latter command failed with the following messages: > WARNING: While re

Re: [Fink-users] fink list shows only 18 packages

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > On mardi, sep 17, 2002, at 19:28 Europe/Paris, Dirk Taggesell wrote: >> How can I access the numerous additional packages? > > fink selfupdate-cvs > Or he may have skipped step 4 of the bootstrap guide. http://fink.source

Re: [Fink-users] Openssl Zlib dependency not removed

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 06:49 pm, Ben Hines wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Alwyn wrote: > >> I am running the experimental Fink for Mac OS 10.2 and have just >> tried to update my installation with 'fink selfupdate-cvs' followed >> by 'fink update-all'. The

Re: [Fink-users] Openssl Zlib dependency not removed

Ah, you're right. Fixed. On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 11:02 AM, Alwyn wrote: >> > > Yes, and I previously installed KDE and many other packages. But 'fink > selfupdate-cvs' gave me the following this afternoon: > > U 10.2/unstable/crypto/finkinfo/openssl-0.9.6g-1.info > U 10.2/unstable/c

Re: [Fink-users] fink list shows only 18 packages

On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:38:16 +0200 Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On mardi, sep 17, 2002, at 19:28 Europe/Paris, Dirk Taggesell wrote: > > How can I access the numerous additional packages? > >fink selfupdate-cvs Though I forgot this in the first place, after I performed it, s

[Fink-users] confirm

confirm 715525 -- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/develop

Re: [Fink-users] 10.2 Xfree building errors (rman?)

Joseph wrote: > /usr/bin/cc -o rman -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -no-cpp-precomp > rman.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib > ld: Undefined symbols: > ___eprintf This is almost impossible. The symbol ___eprintf is defined in libgcc.a (for gcc-3.1), and libgcc.a is *always* included by the linker. This look

Re: [Fink-users] Continuing story of problems with xfree86 on 10.2.1

On Wednesday, September 4, 2002, at 03:47 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > NDPTAL85 wrote: > [] >> I'm still on 10.1.5 here with the 10.1.x Dev Tools and I'm having the >> same problems. Here's a paste of my terminal: > > No, your problem is not the same. Yours is a simple path problem that > can

Re: [Fink-users] Continuing story of problems with xfree86 on 10.2.1

NDPTAL85 wrote: [] > Any idea on when that new verison of xfree86-base-*-info will be > finished/released? Seems to be there now (in the 10.2 tree). -- Martin --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hamm

Re: [Fink-users] Continuing story of problems with xfree86 on 10.2.1

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > NDPTAL85 wrote: > [] >> Any idea on when that new verison of xfree86-base-*-info will be >> finished/released? > > Seems to be there now (in the 10.2 tree). > > -- Martin I'm still on 10.1.5 for the forseable future. Will t

[Fink-users] Using the unstable tree

Hello, I've done just as the jaguar-bootstrap document has shown, but I still can't get "unstable" packages. I've added the unstable/main and unstable/crypto branches to the end of the tree line in the fink.conf file. A specific example is perlmagick-pm. fink list is giving me only a few files

[Fink-users] New (binary) releases of Fink?

On Sep 17 2002, NDPTAL85 wrote: > On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > >Seems to be there now (in the 10.2 tree). > > I'm still on 10.1.5 for the forseable future. Will there be one for > 10.1.5 too? As I'm still going to use 10.1.5 for the foreseeable fu

Re: [Fink-users] New (binary) releases of Fink?

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 06:12 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: > > For instance, when will a next binary release be available? No > exact dates are needed, of course -- just a rough idea is > enough. This week or next. > > Will the next (binary) version of Fink be m

Re: [Fink-users] New (binary) releases of Fink?

> ...compiling packages in my iBook with little memory is quite > demanding... iBooks can be upgraded to at least 320 MB of RAM; a 256 MB SO-DIMM will put you back about $90, and you will bless it every day you run your iBook! -- ~~

Re: [Fink-users] New (binary) releases of Fink?

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 11:30 PM, Jim Saklad wrote: >> ...compiling packages in my iBook with little memory is quite >> demanding... > > iBooks can be upgraded to at least 320 MB of RAM; a 256 MB SO-DIMM will > put you back about $90, and you will bless it every day you run your > iBo