Re: [Fink-users] unrtf compile failure

Benjamin Reed wrote: [] It will, if you're using the new version of fink (0.14.2), and you're working in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. the "regular" 10.2 tree isn't really set up to enforce those kinds of things. But, unless it is decided to stop updating the regular 10.2 tree altogether, shouldn't the

[Fink-users] abiword missing patch?

All, I finally got the cvs selfupdate to hold a connection long enough to upgrade (yay!!). Now, update-all is bailing out, complaining that the patch for abiword-1.0.3.12 isn't there. Any clues, anyone? Later, Andy - Yada, yada, yada... The information contained in this e-mail (i

RE: [Fink-users] Gnumeric problem with miss lib file

Try "fink reinstall dlcompat-shlibs"--the file probably is missing. -- Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Potter Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:12 AM

Re: [Fink-users] fink hangs

Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roman Poeschl wrote: | ^CInformation about 2986 packages read in 10878 seconds. | | 3dpong 0.4-2 Pong clone | i a2ps 4.12-4 Any to PostScript filter | ... | | S

Re: [Fink-users] fink hangs

Roman Poeschl wrote: [] which cc /sw/bin/cc cc -v (Nothing happens) Looks like a broken ccache installation. ccache-default installs /sw/bin/cc as a symlink to /sw/bin/ccache from the ccache package, which in turn calls your real compilers. I don't know why it doesn't give you a decent err

[Fink-users] FWD: fink selfupdate

Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:47:21 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Guy Lauquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: fink selfupdate Dear david, I recently try running fink selfupdate-rsync after a last fink selfupdate-cvs as recommended in your message. But I failed: [chamaerops:~] guy% fink selfupdate

Re: [Fink-users] fink install pdfslide fails ...no longer

Was /sw/bin/HEAD installed by a Fink package? If so, the maintainer really needs to do something about this issue. On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 01:25 AM, Avram Aelony wrote: All is working well after moving the copy in /usr/bin to /sw/bin thanks! -A On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 08:39 PM

Re: [Fink-users] unrtf compile failure

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benjamin Reed wrote: > [] > > It will, if you're using the new version of fink (0.14.2), and you're > > working in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. the "regular" 10.2 tree isn't really > > set up to enforce those kinds of things. > > But, unless it is decided

Re: [Fink-users] FWD: fink selfupdate

Guy Lauquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently try running fink selfupdate-rsync after a last fink > selfupdate-cvs as recommended in your message. But I failed: > > [chamaerops:~] guy% fink selfupdate-rsync > sudo /sw/bin/fink selfupdate-rsync > Password: > > Please note: the command '

Re: [Fink-users] fink hangs

Martin Costabel wrote: Roman Poeschl wrote: [] which cc /sw/bin/cc cc -v (Nothing happens) Looks like a broken ccache installation. ccache-default installs /sw/bin/cc as a symlink to /sw/bin/ccache from the ccache package, which in turn calls your real compilers. I don't know why it doe

Re: [Fink-users] fink hangs

Roman Poeschl wrote: sorry, for replying so late. I was absent and hadn't access to my mail (Or better to the computer on which the problem is). Thanks for getting back to me, now I am pretty sure I know the problem :) printenv PATH /sw/bin:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/loca

Re: [Fink-users] fink hangs

Martin Costabel wrote: Roman Poeschl wrote: [] which cc /sw/bin/cc cc -v (Nothing happens) Looks like a broken ccache installation. ccache-default installs /sw/bin/cc as a symlink to /sw/bin/ccache from the ccache package, which in turn calls your real compilers. I don't know why it doe

[Fink-users] gfortran broken?

I just built the gfortran (20030825-1) package, but the resulting binary doesn't work: % f95 -v icon8.f Driving: f95 -v icon8.f -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm Reading specs from /sw/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin6.8/3.5-tree-ssa/specs Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/sw --enable-l

Re: [Fink-users] fink install pdfslide fails ...no longer

I did download/install libwww-pm-5.68-1 on the day the miscreant /sw/bin/HEAD was installed. I've renamed it "HEADperl", here is my current setup: -rwxr-xr-x1 aelony staff 14436 Oct 13 18:50 /sw/bin/HEAD* -r-xr-xr-x1 root admin 14361 Sep 19 06:32 /sw/bin/HEADperl* hop

Re: [Fink-users] fink install pdfslide fails ...no longer

That's what installed it. I'm going to put a post on -devel about this. On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 12:16 PM, Avram Aelony wrote: I did download/install libwww-pm-5.68-1 on the day the miscreant /sw/bin/HEAD was installed. I've renamed it "HEADperl", here is my current setup: -rwxr-xr-x

Re: [Fink-users] fink install pdfslide fails ...no longer

Maybe I won't bug the developers after all...the version of libwww-pm (5.69-3) that I have doesn't have /sw/bin/HEAD in it. On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 12:16 PM, Avram Aelony wrote: I did download/install libwww-pm-5.68-1 on the day the miscreant /sw/bin/HEAD was installed. I've renamed i

Re: [Fink-users] fink hangs

On Tuesday 14 October 2003 09:35, Roman Poeschl wrote: > Hi Martin and Peter, > > that was it. I guess it was the missing symlink between from /sw/bin/cc > to /sw/bin/ccache. In fact I found the file 'cc' having the same size > as 'ccache' (So it was in my case > not a link at all). > > After ha

Re: [Fink-users] gfortran broken?

Daniel: see http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/usage.html#fixed specifically the part that says "it is important to notice that files named *.f are by default assumed to be written in Fortran 77, and are not handled by G95. In order to compile such files with G95, one thus has to explicitly give -x

Re: [Fink-users] FWD: fink selfupdate

Guy Lauquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > What port does rsync use? rsync uses port 873. -- Dave --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people

Re: [Fink-users] The Future of the Fink Website - Infrastructure RoadMap

Darian Lanx wrote: I am curious if the Fink Community has specific knowledge about a better system or any type of idea that could help us improve our Web-Infrastructure. I've no doubt you're about to get recommendations for every open source CMS out their :) But I'll throw mine in too. Drupal:

[Fink-users] [Cross-Post] The Future of the Fink Website - Infrastructure RoadMap

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I apologies for cross posting, but I think this is an issue that requires input from both, developers and users. Dear Fink Community. Some might not yet know, I am the one that does a lot of organisational and PR work for Fink. I was thinking a

[Fink-users] Multi Gnome Terminal Update?

Hi, I know everyone is busy with Panther and gcc 3.3 and rsync and everything else (great work!), but I have a respectful request: Multi Gnome Terminal is up to version 1.6.2, but fink is only on version 1.3.8. Can you please update it? Thank you, Dan Sommers --