Mark J. Reed wrote:
[]
> The question is, is there a right way? If you just install the
> completion rules anyway, a subsequent attempt to install bash-completion
> will complain about the existing files. If you don't install them
> unless the package is there, then a subsequent installation m
I suspect the daemonic package added some helpful custom completions for the
daemonic command, which is a nice thing to do. But making the package
dependent on bash-completion is clearly the wrong way to do it.
The question is, is there a right way? If you just install the completion
rules anywa
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:42:23PM -0800, William Scott wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel et al:
>
> I just noticed this too. Why does daemonic get installed if there are no
> dependencies, and why does it need a completion system for an interactive
> shell?
In my case, I imagine daemonic got installed becaus
Gary K Olson wrote:
> I used rsync-selfupdate today from a US mirror to get libiconv-1.12-3
> and updated qt4-x11 info and patch files to successfully compile and
> install the libiconv, qt4-x11 and lyx-qt on 10.5.1 iBook G4. I
> believe that the early success on my G5 may have been done wit
I used rsync-selfupdate today from a US mirror to get libiconv-1.12-3
and updated qt4-x11 info and patch files to successfully compile and
install the libiconv, qt4-x11 and lyx-qt on 10.5.1 iBook G4. I
believe that the early success on my G5 may have been done with Rick's
original test fil
On 30 Jan 2008, at 00:30, Enrico Costanza wrote:
> Jean-Francois Mertens wrote:
>> Enrico Costanza wrote:
Failed: phase compiling: libx264-57-shlibs-0.0.20071214-1 failed
>>>
>>> In particular, this is the error that I get:
>> ..
> ld: common/i386/pixel-sse2.o has external relocation ent
On 30 Jan 2008, at 00:30, Enrico Costanza wrote:
> Jean-Francois Mertens wrote:
>> Enrico Costanza wrote:
>>> > Failed: phase compiling: libx264-57-shlibs-0.0.20071214-1 failed
>>>
>>> In particular, this is the error that I get:
>> ..
> ld: common/i386/pixel-sse2.o has external relocation en
Hi Daniel et al:
I just noticed this too. Why does daemonic get installed if there are no
dependencies, and why does it need a completion system for an interactive
shell?
Also, when I made a set of files to augment the zsh completion system, I
was told I had to make it depend on fink's zsh p
Jean-Francois Mertens wrote:
> Enrico Costanza wrote:
>> > Failed: phase compiling: libx264-57-shlibs-0.0.20071214-1 failed
>>
>> In particular, this is the error that I get:
> ..
ld: common/i386/pixel-sse2.o has external relocation entries in
>>> non-writable section (__TEXT,__text) for symb
Enrico Costanza wrote:
> > Failed: phase compiling: libx264-57-shlibs-0.0.20071214-1 failed
>
> In particular, this is the error that I get:
..
>>> ld: common/i386/pixel-sse2.o has external relocation entries in
>> non-writable section (__TEXT,__text) for symbols:
>> _x264_pixel_sad_x4_8x8_mmxext
Hi All,
I am using osx 10.4. I have a fresh installation of fink, and I use X11
from Apple.
I do not manage to install libx264-57 -- when I run fink install
libx264-57 I get:
Failed: phase compiling: libx264-57-shlibs-0.0.20071214-1 failed
In particular, this is the error that I get:
> gcc -dy
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:14:01PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:31:01PM +, Viv Kendon wrote:
> >
> > In fact, I managed to remove daemonic (don't know how it
> > originally got installed) and then bash-completion. I got
> > the following warning though:
> >
> > R
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:31:01PM +, Viv Kendon wrote:
>
> In fact, I managed to remove daemonic (don't know how it
> originally got installed) and then bash-completion. I got
> the following warning though:
>
> Removing bash-completion ...
> dpkg - warning: while removing bash-completion
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:31:01PM +, Viv Kendon wrote:
>
> In fact, I managed to remove daemonic (don't know how it
> originally got installed) and then bash-completion. I got
> the following warning though:
>
> Removing bash-completion ...
> dpkg - warning: while removing bash-completion, di
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Richard Cobbe wrote:
>>
>> First, it appears that the daemonic package depends on bash-completions;
>> this is presumably why fink installed the bash-completions package. I
>> certainly didn't explicitly ask for bash-completions. Now,
>> "dpkg -L dae
qt4-x11 etc. and lyx-qt built on my iMac G5 under 10.5.1 with the new
libiconv-1.12-3 and updated qt4-x11 info and patch files. I am
running qt4-x11 on my ibook G4 under 10.5.1 as I write this. I
updated to 1.12-3 through rsync from US mirrors.
Gary K Olson
---
It sounds like the macbook pro isn't running "fink scanpackages" after
each build, and so the local package information isn't getting passed on
to apt. Older versions of fink required you to set a fink.conf flag to
do so, but that seems no longer to be the case for what I'm running
(0.28.0).
On a related note, I cannot make sense of an oddity I discovered in
fink binary distribution management.
I've got an intel-based imac and a macbook pro running the latest
tiger+xcode+finkcryptounstable (and using the very same fink mirrors)
but the
lists of binary packages available for install i
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Kevin Horton wrote:
> []
>> For some reason, the new libiconv 1.12-1 that arrived via selfupdate
>> a few hours ago differs quite substantially from the libiconv 1.12-3
>> that Benjamin offered for testing.
>
> Indeed. That's not what we all have been testing. And we di
Kevin Horton wrote:
[]
> For some reason, the new libiconv 1.12-1 that arrived via selfupdate
> a few hours ago differs quite substantially from the libiconv 1.12-3
> that Benjamin offered for testing.
Indeed. That's not what we all have been testing. And we didn't notice,
because we had 1.12
On 28 Jan 2008, at 21:09, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> Koen van der Drift wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I get the following error on an iMac G5, OS X 10.5.1, fink 0.28.0:
>>
>> ...
>> /usr/bin/install -d -m 755 /sw/src/fink.build/root-qt4-x11-core-
>> shlibs-4.3.3-1/sw/lib/qt4-x11/plugins
>> /bin/mv /sw/src
And if you check here:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.cvs
you will see that the latest update for libiconv is 1.12-1, not 1.12-3.
- Koen.
On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Koen van der Drift wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>>>
On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Are you using selfupdate-rsync? In this case, which mirror is your
> Fink using for selfupdating? I see that the European mirrors
No, I use selfupdate-cvs, and I live in the US (for what it is worth).
- Koen.
-
Koen van der Drift wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>
>
>>Ick. This is supposed to have been fixed. Are libiconv-* up-to-date
>>(all at 1.12-3)?
>
>
> i libiconv 1.12-1 Character set conversion
> library
> i libiconv-bin
24 matches
Mail list logo
