[Fink-users] X desktop manager availability in 10,7

Hello, I keep monitoring the 10.7 tree (I have a 10.7 virtual machine for the purpose) and I keep noticing that no desktop manager (such as Gnome, KDE, or Xfce) is yet available. I am therefore wondering whether this is a matter of issues with those desktop managers or is simply caused by the fac

Re: [Fink-users] X desktop manager availability in 10,7

Hello, At 14:35 -0700 on 2012-3-29 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 3/29/12 2:08 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > I keep monitoring the 10.7 tree (I have a 10.7 virtual machine for the > > purpose) and I keep noticing that no desktop manager (such as Gnome, > >

Re: [Fink-users] X desktop manager availability in 10,7

Hello, At 14:05 -0400 on 2012-3-30 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > If you have 10.7 running someplace, it is pretty easy to test packages > from the 10.5/6 tree. Sometimes they'll work as is, other times they'll > need a little patching, and sometimes they'll fail miserably :) Of course

[Fink-users] Metacity on 10.7 builds but does not build

Hello, I am attempting to build metacity on 10.7 (just a random package toward bundle-gnome). Using fink the configuration goes fine and then make fails as follows (/opt/sw is my fink prefix): make make all-recursive Making all in src [ ... ] gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I

Re: [Fink-users] Metacity on 10.7 builds but does not build

Hello, At 11:33 +0200 on 2012-3-31 Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 31.3.2012 um 02:52 schrieb Stefan Bruda: > > > I am sure I am missing something, but what would be the difference > > between the fink environment and the shell? Advice is appreciated. > > This

Re: [Fink-users] firefox fails to build

Hello, At 11:27 -0400 on 2012-4-11 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > Unfortunately, this is a known failure with Xcode 4.3 and firefox8. And > more unfortunately, firefox8 is probably the last version of firefox-x11 > that's buildable on OS X without some *major* effort. Mozilla did a lot

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-1 failed

Webkit fails as follows on a fresh fink install on 10.7 (Xcode 4.2). I noticed an older thread dealing with the same package and at least in part same error , but there was no resolution on that one either. Advice is appreciated. CXXLD

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-1 failed

Hello, At 17:55 -0700 on 2012-4-11 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/11/12 4:57 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Webkit fails as follows on a fresh fink install on 10.7 (Xcode 4.2). > > I noticed an older thread dealing with the same package and at least > > in pa

[Fink-users] Evince missing patch file in the 10.7 tree

Hello, I just tried to install evince on my fresh 10.7 fink install and it complains like this: Failed: Cannot read PatchFile "/opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/evince.patch" (/opt/sw being my Fink prefix). Sure enough, said patch is missing. I thought you may want to know a

[Fink-users] Successfully bundle-gnome build on 10.7

Hello, I just managed to build bundle-gnome on my 10.7 box (Xcode 4.2). The whole thing appears to work well except for the minor quirk of needing to launch gnome-settings-daemon by hand. The whole thing was built copying the missing packages from the 10.6 tree and performing minor tweaks only.

Re: [Fink-users] Evince missing patch file in the 10.7 tree

At 23:04 -0400 on 2012-4-11 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > On 4/11/2012 10:12 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > I just tried to install evince on my fresh 10.7 fink install and it > > complains like this: > > > > Failed: Cannot read PatchFile

[Fink-users] Enlightenment builds and works on 10.7

Hi, I don't know how pertinent this is to the world at large (who has probably moved to more modern window managers by now ;-) ), but I am partial to the enlightenment window manager (the 16 i.e. old variety), having been using it for ages. I am in fact using a horrible hack to have it on 10.6 bu

Re: [Fink-users] firefox8 still fails to build

Hi, At 15:33 -0700 on 2012-4-12 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > 4.1 is the last Xcode to provide gcc-4.2. In principle firefox8 could > use BuildDepends: gcc4.2 on 10.7, unless Stefan was able to get it to > build with clang from Xcode 4.2, in which case it could have > BuildDepends (clang <=

[Fink-users] msttcorefonts?

Hello, During my migration to 10.7 I noticed that msttcorefonts is missing from the 10.7 tree, but just copying the info files over (together with the needed cabextract) does it nicely. Is there any reason these have not been ported? Many thanks, Stefan -- If it was so, it might be; and if it

[Fink-users] Move Fink on a new (identical) machine

Hello, Now that I am satisfied with how Fink works on my test (virtual) machine, I am ready to upgrade my main machine and move what I already have there. I see at least three ways of doing it: 1. Most tempting, I thought of just copying the whole /sw (/opt/sw in my case actually) to the new

Re: [Fink-users] Move Fink on a new (identical) machine

Hello, At 11:05 -0700 on 2012-4-13 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/13/12 9:31 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > Now that I am satisfied with how Fink works on my test (virtual) > > machine, I am ready to upgrade my main machine and move what I already > > hav

Re: [Fink-users] msttcorefonts?

At 19:35 +0200 on 2012-4-13 Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 13/04/12 17:46, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hello, > > > > During my migration to 10.7 I noticed that msttcorefonts is missing > > from the 10.7 tree, but just copying the info files over (together > >

Re: [Fink-users] Window frames in Gnome on 10.7.3

Hi, At 17:22 -0600 on 2012-4-25 Gary K Olson wrote: > > I realized that there were now enough files available for Lion to > run gnome-panel, so I downloaded and set things up to run rootless > without metacity. However, I have no window frames. You *must* specify a window manager. You can

Re: [Fink-users] Window frames in Gnome on 10.7.3

At 11:37 -0400 on 2012-4-26 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > metacity builds on 10.7 with only minor changes to the .info, but it > crashes on startup, which is why it has not been added to 10.7. Metacity worked for me well last time I tried (I don't care too much about it in fact but it i

Re: [Fink-users] Window frames in Gnome on 10.7.3

Hi, At 14:18 -0400 on 2012-4-26 Stefan Bruda wrote: > > At 11:37 -0400 on 2012-4-26 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > > > metacity builds on 10.7 with only minor changes to the .info, but it > > crashes on startup, which is why it has not been added to 10.7. &

[Fink-users] fuse4x-0.10.0-1 broken?

Hi, Latest fuse4x installation seems to be broken on my machine. I get the following: < godel:~ > fink list fuse Information about 4692 packages read in 0 seconds. i fuse4x-dev 0.10.0-1File System in User Space (fuse4x) i fuse4x-kext 0.10.0-1

Re: [Fink-users] fuse4x-0.10.0-1 broken?

Hello, At 15:51 -0700 on 2012-4-29 Brendan Cully wrote: > > On Sunday, 29 April 2012 at 14:40, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > Latest fuse4x installation seems to be broken on my machine. I get > > the following: > > > > < godel:~ > fink list fus

[Fink-users] firefox8 configure failure

Hello, Building firefox8 fails as follows: checking HOST_LIBIDL_LIBS... -L/opt/sw/lib -lIDL-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl checking for glib-2.0 >= 1.3.7 gobject-2.0... yes checking GLIB_CFLAGS... -I/opt/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include checking GLIB_LIBS...

Re: [Fink-users] firefox8 configure failure

Hello, At 15:26 -0400 on 2012-8-7 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > I've just checked in a fix. 'fink selfupdate' should bring the new > version. The failure was caused by having a 64bit egrep at the > front of $PATH (Fink's on 10.7, system's on 10.8) since neither > took kindly to being

Re: [Fink-users] firefox8 configure failure

Hello, At 22:26 +0200 on 2012-8-7 Peter Dyballa wrote: > > If you're really interested to find out which tool produced that > "Bad CPU" then you just need to look into look into configure's LOG > file, config.log, which can be found in > /sw/src/fink.build/firefox*/firefox* � I have no idea w

[Fink-users] farsight2 build failure

Hello, In the latest (for me...) update-all farsight2 fails because of a typo: Making all in libs make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/sw/src/fink.build/farsight2-0.0.21-3/farsight2-0.0.21/docs/libs' Makefile:773: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop.

[Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

Hello, I am pretty sure that I saw somewhere a note about upgrading from 10.7 to 10.8 but I cannot find it anymore. I apologize therefore in advance if my question is a duplicate (and I will appreciate a pointer to the first occurrence...). I am contemplating upgrading my machine to Mac OS 10.8.

Re: [Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

Hello, At 18:23 -0700 on 2012-11-26 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 11/26/12 3:34 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > I am contemplating upgrading my machine to Mac OS 10.8. It appears > > that Fink can be upgraded in place. After the OS upgrade I will > &

Re: [Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

Hello, At 20:06 -0700 on 2012-11-26 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > > > Is there anything I am missing and/or doing wrong? This is my main > > > > machine so I just want to be doubly-sure that the upgrade is not going > > > > to break things... Many thanks in advance. > > > > > > That

Re: [Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

At 19:27 -0700 on 2012-11-27 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > and then an enumeration of many (all) installed packages. I also got > > an "injected" directory in %p/fink/10.8/local/ (this one probably > > during selfupdate though I am not really sure) with the following > > content: > > > >

Re: [Fink-users] tetex on 10.8/x86_64

Hi, At 19:01 +0100 on 2012-11-29 Jean-Francois Donati wrote: > > what is the situation regarding tetex, and its porting to 10.8? is > it likely to happen soon? I believe that teTeX has been dead for a long time. > or is it discontinued, in which case, which package is the closest > repla

[Fink-users] PatchFile portaudio2 checksum does not match

Hi, Last update fails because the following checksum mismatch. I am guessing that a patch update was not followed by the corresponding checksum update... Should any other information be needed just let me know. /opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-portaudio2-2.19.0-2021-1 (Reading d

Re: [Fink-users] PatchFile portaudio2 checksum does not match

At 20:43 -0700 on 2012-12-8 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 12/8/12 8:16 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > Last update fails because the following checksum mismatch. I am > > guessing that a patch update was not followed by the corresponding > > checks

Re: [Fink-users] PatchFile portaudio2 checksum does not match

At 21:49 -0700 on 2012-12-8 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > > What OS version? > > > > Err, sorry, I thought that this does not matter for an MD5 checksum > > and the such. It all happens on 10.8 (Darwin Kernel Version 12.2.0), > > with fink 0.34.4 and Xcode 4.5.2. > > It _can_ matter, be

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libavcodec54-1.0-shlibs-1.0.1-1 failed

Hello, In the last update I get a failure for libavcodec54-1.0 as follows: Looking for incorrect headers in 1158 dependency files... ./finkbuild/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.d uses /opt/sw/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftconfig.h ./finkbuild/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.d uses /opt/

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling:libavcodec54-1.0-shlibs-1.0.1-1 failed

Hello, At 13:36 -0500 on 2012-12-9 Daniel Macks wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 10:44:57 -0700, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > On 12/9/12 10:22 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > In the last update I get a failure for libavcodec54-1.0 as follow

[Fink-users] tar stuck!

Hi, I am getting a strange problem when I try to upgrade anything that involves expanding tar archives. Updating readline6 for example gets stuck at the following: Unpacking fink-buildlock-readline6-6.2.4-1 (from .../fink-buildlock-readline6-6.2.4-1_2012.12.12-10.30.33_darwin-x86_64.deb) ... Se

Re: [Fink-users] tar stuck!

Hello, At 08:55 -0700 on 2012-12-12 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 12/12/12 8:43 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > I am getting a strange problem when I try to upgrade anything that > > involves expanding tar archives. Updating readline6 for example gets &g

Re: [Fink-users] Can not get this script to run

Hello, At 13:16 -0700 on 2013-2-21 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > As I've said before, the gnome-session program itself is *broken*. > It wasn't when this script was written, but something has changed > since then and now it is. Interesting... Any idea why on my system gnome-session did not see

Re: [Fink-users] Can not get this script to run

Hello, At 16:27 -0700 on 2013-2-21 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 2/21/13 3:53 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 2/21/13 3:16 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > >> > >> Interesting... Any idea why on my system gnome-session did not see > >> this messag

[Fink-users] gcc48 vs gcc47

Hello, Now that GCC 4.8 is out I am wondering whether it is safe to move my Fink installation from the gcc47 package to the latest and greatest. It should be a matter of uninstalling gcc47, gcc47-compiler, and gcc47-shlibs and installing the corresponding gcc48* packages, right? Actually now that

Re: [Fink-users] gcc48 vs gcc47

Hi, At 20:41 +0200 on 2013-4-5 Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 05.04.2013 um 19:18 schrieb Stefan Bruda: > > > It should be a matter of uninstalling gcc47, gcc47-compiler, and > > gcc47-shlibs and installing the corresponding gcc48* packages, right? > > No, no, jus

[Fink-users] mplayer run failure (openjpeg?)

Hi, Recently mplayer ceased to run properly (Mac OS 10.8.3, Xcode tools 4.6.0.0.1.1365, Fink 0.34.7, Fink tree synced a couple of minutes ago). Instead of the usual functionality running it results in the following: < godel:~ > mplayer /* This file was automatically generated by t1_gene

Re: [Fink-users] mplayer run failure (openjpeg?)

Hello, Thank you first of all for the quick response. At 20:17 -0400 on 2013-4-27 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > On 4/27/2013 7:48 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Recently mplayer ceased to run properly (Mac OS 10.8.3, Xcode tools > > 4.6.0.0.

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: osxfuse-2.5.6-1 failed

Hello, The current update-all wants to update sshfs which in turns pulls osxfuse in. Problem is, osxfuse fails as follows: sudo -u fink-bld [ENV] sh -c /tmp/fink.7W2on sed -i.bak -e 's,/Library/Filesystems/,/opt/sw/lib/,' common/fuse_param.h sed -i.bak -e 's,/usr/local,/opt/sw,' ../osxfuse-fuse

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: osxfuse-2.5.6-1 failed

At 06:58 -0700 on 2013-10-1 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > The problem here appears to be due to the fact that there is not a 10.7 > > SDK in Xcode 5 at all, and that osxfuse doesn't declare a dependency on > > it even though it uses it: > > > > $ fink list sdk > > Information about 8024 pack

Re: [Fink-users] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

Hello, I am not sure whether the bounce below is of any consequence, but I thought that you guys would be interested in knowing about it given that the connection was refused by a server belonging to the Fink project. Apparently my system kept trying for 5 days or so before giving up... Cheers,

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

Hello, At 11:31 -0800 on 2013-12-2 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 12/2/13 8:09 AM, Steve wrote: > > I have osx 10.9 and fink 0.36.1. > > When I try to build the osxfuse package, > > the build fails with the message: > > > > xcodebuild MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7 SDKROOT=macosx10.7 > > Bu

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

Hello, At 17:03 -0800 on 2013-12-2 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 12/2/13 4:54 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > This has been known to happen for at least two months > > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/37403>. > > That

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

At 18:11 -0800 on 2013-12-2 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 12/2/13 5:59 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > Thanks, I was able to download the sources. Unfortunately said > > sources insist in wanting llvm-gcc42 (which does not exist anymore > > within Xcode) even afte

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

Hello, At 10:24 -0800 on 2013-12-9 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > I just found a .info file that one of the other developers sent me a > while back. This is why I *HATE* it when people don't use public > channels for things like that. > > I uploaded it to https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/pack

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-5 failed

System info: Mac OS: 10.8.5 Package manager version: 0.36.3.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Apr 2 09:07:17 2014, 10.8, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main Xcode.app: 5.1 Xcode command-line tools: 5.1.0.0.1.1393561416 webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-5 is set to build with only one job. Failure:

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-5 failed

Hello, At 00:54 +0200 on 2014-4-4 Martin Costabel wrote: > > I have also a patch for both of them that allows me to build > webkit-1.0.2. I think the patch is non-toxic for previous build > tools and OS versions, so I am just checking it in to CVS and wait > what happens (webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-6

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: valgrind-3.9.0-1 failed

Hi, Configuring valgrind results in the following error: checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/opt/sw/src/fink.build/valgrind-3.9.0-1/valgrind-3.9.0': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details ###

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: valgrind-3.9.0-1 failed

Hello, At 22:44 -0400 on 2014-4-8 Daniel Johnson wrote: > > Thanks, it was the -new_linker flag which is apparently no longer > supported. Removing it fixed the build for me on 10.9. Let me know > if it's good on 10.8 for you. I confirm that the new version builds fine on 10.8. Many thanks.

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libsidplay-1.36.59-1001 failed

Hi, Fresh 10.9 fink installation with the binary distribution enabled chokes on compiling libsidplay as follows: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"libsidplay\" -DVERSION=\"1.36.59\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libsidplay-1.36.59-1001 failed

Hello, At 21:59 +0200 on 2014-4-12 Martin Costabel wrote: > > That configure script is 10 years old, from a time when iostream.h was > still a valid C++ header file. It does > > #include > #include > > and thinks the resulting error message about iostream.h not found means

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: dirac-1.0.2-2 failed

Hello, On the following system: Package manager version: 0.36.4.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Apr 16 22:56:44 2014, 10.9, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main Xcode.app: 5.1.1 Xcode command-line tools: 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587 Max. Fink build jobs: 8 the failure goes as follows: lib

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: dirac-1.0.2-2 failed

At 08:57 -0500 on 2014-4-17 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > What package is requesting dirac? Apparently it is used by both ffmpeg and mplayer: < godel:finkinfo/graphics > pwd /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics < godel:finkinfo/graphics > grep -r dirac * | grep -v dirac.info: ffmp

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ddd-3.3.12-3 failed

On the following system: Package manager version: 0.36.4.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Apr 17 18:38:07 2014, 10.9, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main Xcode.app: 5.1.1 Xcode command-line tools: 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587 Max. Fink build jobs: 1 ddd fails as follows: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: fltk-x11-1.1.10-1 failed

On the following system: Package manager version: 0.36.4.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Apr 17 18:38:07 2014, 10.9, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main Xcode.app: 5.1.1 Xcode command-line tools: 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587 Max. Fink build jobs: 1 building fltk fails as follows: Compilin

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libx264-118-shlibs-0.0.20111013-4 failed

On the following system: Package manager version: 0.36.4.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Apr 17 18:38:07 2014, 10.9, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main Xcode.app: 5.1.1 Xcode command-line tools: 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587 Max. Fink build jobs: 1 building libx264-118 fails as follows: g

[Fink-users] guile18-1.8.8-6 build hangs

Hello, On the following system: Package manager version: 0.36.4.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Apr 17 18:38:07 2014, 10.9, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main Xcode.app: 5.1.1 Xcode command-line tools: 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587 Max. Fink build jobs: 1 building guile18 reaches the foll

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libx264-118-shlibs-0.0.20111013-4 failed

Hello, At 20:34 -0500 on 2014-4-17 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > I have no way to test 10.9. If you feel comfortable manually > editing files in the failed build dir, edit the file > /sw/src/fink.build/libx264-118-shlibs/x264-snapshot-20111013-2245/common/osdep.h > as shown in this pat

Re: [Fink-users] guile18-1.8.8-6 build hangs

Hello, At 19:57 -0700 on 2014-4-17 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/17/14, 5:26 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > On the following system: > > > > Package manager version: 0.36.4.1 > > Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Apr 17 18:38:07 2014, 10.9,

[Fink-users] Errorneus output for file

Hello, I just discovered that Fink's file behaves strangely on my system (Mac OS 10.9, Xcode 5.1.1, command-line tools 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587, distribution rsync-ed today from ber.de.eu.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo/): < godel:main/finkinfo > file libsidplay.info libsidplay.info: ERROR: line 163: regex

[Fink-users] apt newer than in Fink's tree?

Hello, I bootstrapped Fink earlier today (OS upgrade) from the tarball downloaded by the latest update of my old install (which was fink-0.36.4.1.tar.gz). I then rsync-ed (from ber.de.eu.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo/), and went ahead and reconstructed my software. At the end of the day (quite litera

Re: [Fink-users] apt newer than in Fink's tree?

At 20:56 -0700 on 2014-4-17 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/17/14, 8:44 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > I bootstrapped Fink earlier today (OS upgrade) from the tarball > > downloaded by the latest update of my old install (which was > > fink-0.36.4.1.t

Re: [Fink-users] guile18-1.8.8-6 build hangs

Hello, At 10:15 +0200 on 2014-4-18 Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 18/04/14 05:19, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hello, > > > > At 19:57 -0700 on 2014-4-17 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > > > > On 4/17/14, 5:26 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > [] > >

Re: [Fink-users] Errorneus output for file

At 11:03 +0200 on 2014-4-18 Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 18/04/14 05:43, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just discovered that Fink's file behaves strangely on my system (Mac > > OS 10.9, Xcode 5.1.1, command-line tools 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587, &

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: fltk-x11-1.1.10-1 failed

Hello, At 15:56 +0200 on 2014-4-18 Martin Costabel wrote: > > This is the same type of error as for ddd-3.3.12-3. > > On 18/04/14 02:07, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > On the following system: > > > > Package manager version: 0.36.4.1 > > Distribution versio

[Fink-users] Is it possible to resume a build?

Hello, My workflow for tweaking Fink packages currently goes like this: wait for the build to fail, make changes in the build directory, obtain the corresponding patch, change the package description to account for this, re-issue the respective "fink install" command. This if inefficient and anno

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: guile20-2.0.11-1 failed

Hello, Another apparent hang, this time for guile20. The build has proceeded up to this point: make[2]: Entering directory `/sw/src/fink.build/guile20-2.0.11-1/guile-2.0.11/build/module' GUILEC ice-9/eval.go wrote `ice-9/eval.go' GUILEC ice-9/psyntax-pp.go GUILEC ice-9/boot-9.go GUILEC

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: guile20-2.0.11-1 failed

Hello, At 15:12 +0200 on 2014-4-19 Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 19/04/14 14:08, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > Another apparent hang, this time for guile20. The build has proceeded > > up to this point: > > > > make[2]: Entering directory > >

Re: [Fink-users] Is it possible to resume a build?

Hello, At 18:02 -0700 on 2014-4-18 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/18/14, 3:23 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > Hence my question: Is it possible to resume a build process from some > > user-defined point (say, from after fetching, unpacking, and > > patc

[Fink-users] xdvik failure

Hello, I recently migrated to Mac OS 10.9 and so rebuilt all my Fink software. In the new setup xdvik fails as follows: < godel:310/tests > xdvi xdvi-motif: Error: T1lib failed for character 0x31 `1': Rasterization Aborted. Replacing by whitespace. xdvi-motif: Error: T1lib failed for character

Re: [Fink-users] xdvik failure

At 12:35 -0700 on 2014-4-22 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/22/14, 11:36 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I recently migrated to Mac OS 10.9 and so rebuilt all my Fink > > software. In the new setup xdvik fails as follows: > > > > <

Re: [Fink-users] xdvik failure

Hello, At 15:52 +0200 on 2014-4-26 Martin Costabel wrote: > > I finally found the reason for the crash (don't ask me how...) > In my opinion it is a bug in clang, but of the kind that is unlikely to > get fixed. In objects.c, clang incorrectly thinks that the variable > r->flag is uninitial

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ddd-3.3.12-3 failed

Hello, At 20:02 -0400 on 2014-4-17 Stefan Bruda wrote: > > ddd fails as follows: > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./.. -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include > -O2 -g -Wall -W -Wwrite-strings -mminimal-toc -trigraphs -c -o ddd.o ddd.C > ./strclass.h:813:19: error:

Re: [Fink-users] Could not determine XFree86 version number

Hello, At 11:22 -0700 on 2014-4-26 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/26/14, 11:13 AM, sd-finker wrote: > > fink checks the version of X11 (Xquartz) as part of its virtual package > > system. To understand the cause better we would need to know: > > > > 1) Do you in fact have Xquartz install

[Fink-users] xdvi* does not display overlapped gastex picture elements

Hello, I have been having a bit of a trouble with the way xdvik (and also the plain ol' xdvi) display some files. Most notably in gastex pictures some elements do not get drawn by xdvi*. An example is shown at , as follows: 1. The window to the ri

[Fink-users] GHC build failure (10.6, x86_64)

Hi, GHC does not build on my system (Mac OS 10.6.4, Xcode 3.2, Fink 0.29.13 (x86_64), Zquartz 2.5.3) out of the box. Here is how it fails: Preprocessing library hpc-0.5.0.3... In file included from Reflect.hsc:35: /opt/sw64/src/fink.build/ghc-6.10.4-1/ghc-6.10.4/../ghc-bootstrap/lib/ghc-6.10.4/i

[Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

Hi, Pdftk appears to install nicely, but every time I try to run it I get: < godel:cs/techreps > pdftk rt-testing.pdf background buresearch.pdf output rr.pdf dyld: _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address() error dyld: Symbol not found: _libiconv Referenced from: /opt/sw64/lib/gcc4.5/lib/libg

[Fink-users] MPlayer fails to build (10.6, x86_64)

Hi, MPlayer does not build on my system (Mac OS 10.6.4, Xcode 3.2, Fink 0.29.13 (x86_64), Zquartz 2.5.3) out of the box. Here is how it fails: cc -I../libavcodec -I../libavformat -Wdisabled-optimization -Wno-pointer-sign -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I. -I.. -I../libavutil -Wall -Wno-switch -

Re: [Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

htmare... > Also, please check out pdfkittool that provides a subset of pdftk's > functionality, uses Appe's PdfKit and written in a single language. Thank you for the hint, I will definitely check it out. > On 23.08.2010, at 00:40, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > Hi,

Re: [Fink-users] MPlayer fails to build (10.6, x86_64)

At 08:55 -0400 on 2010-8-23 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 8/22/10 7:52 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > MPlayer does not build on my system (Mac OS 10.6.4, Xcode 3.2, Fink > > 0.29.13 (x86_64), Zquartz 2.5.3) out of the box. Here is how it > >

Re: [Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

Hi, At 09:14 -0400 on 2010-8-23 Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 06:40:43PM -0400, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > Pdftk appears to install nicely, but every time I try to run it I get: > > > > < godel:cs/techreps > pdftk rt-testing.pdf ba

Re: [Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

At 12:04 +0200 on 2010-8-23 Jean-François Mertens wrote: > > On 23 Aug 2010, at 00:40, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > If I build the 32-bit version I get it to run without a hitch, the > > problem is only with the 64-bit version. > > Possibly, but gcc45 (at least 4.

Re: [Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

Hi, At 10:22 -0400 on 2010-8-23 Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:16:47AM -0400, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > Interestingly enough, the 32-bit version also links against Apple's > > libiconv: > > > > < godel:~ > otool -

[Fink-users] ghostscript versus ghostscript-esp

Hi, I discovered that I need ghostscript-esp (because of foomatic-filters), so I installed it (replacing ghostscript). Problem is, gs now segfaults every time I launch it (on perfectly good Postscript files which are viewed fine on my Linux box). I am sure I miss something, but what? Also ggv a

Re: [Fink-users] ghostscript versus ghostscript-esp

At 00:13 -0400 on 2010-10-6 Stefan Bruda wrote: > > I discovered that I need ghostscript-esp (because of > foomatic-filters), so I installed it (replacing ghostscript). > Problem is, gs now segfaults every time I launch it (on perfectly > good Postscript files which are vi

Re: [Fink-users] ghostscript versus ghostscript-esp

Hi, At 09:49 -0400 on 2010-10-6 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > ghostscript-esp is kind of old. There were some patches applied > just to make it build on x86_64, but I'm not sure whether it ran > for anybody. Oh, OK, so foomatic-filters are also not useable (since they depend on ghostscript-esp

[Fink-users] stunnel4-4.34-1+10.6 not working

Hi, I have upgraded stunnel4 to the version mentioned in the subject. This new version however fails to connect. This is what I get in the logs (IP addresses obscured): Nov 15 14:15:18 godel stunnel[26702]: LOG5[26702:140735073397920]: Reading configuration from file /var/folders/bk/bkbnVDi1Ek

Re: [Fink-users] stunnel4-4.34-1+10.6 not working

Hello, At 16:00 -0500 on 2010-11-15 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 11/15/10 2:37 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > > > I have upgraded stunnel4 to the version mentioned in the subject. > > This new version however fails to connect. This is what I get in the > &g

Re: [Fink-users] pop3s://pop.gmail.com protocol died unexpectedly

Hi, At 14:20 +0100 on 2010-11-16 Christof Wolf wrote: > > I updated openssl to 1.0.0 > > NeoVIII:lib LPM$ ls -l libcr* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 326208 12 Nov 01:20 libcroco-0.6.3.0.1.dylib > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 24 12 Nov 01:20 libcroco-0.6.3.dylib -> > libcroco-0.6.3.0.1

Re: [Fink-users] mplayer-1.0.0rc2-1011 failed

Hi, At 15:31 +0100 on 2010-12-23 Christof Wolf wrote: > > I am trying to compile kdemultimedia4-mac, but failing to compile > the mplayer (intel, 64bit, unstable) any idea? I asked once about this failure and apparently it has been a known issue that has not been fixed for roughly half a year.

Re: [Fink-users] mplayer-1.0.0rc2-1011 failed

At 18:25 -0500 on 2010-12-27 Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 12/27/10 5:51 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At 15:31 +0100 on 2010-12-23 Christof Wolf wrote: > > > > > > I am trying to compile kdemultimedia4-mac, but failing to compile

Re: [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

Hi, Having upgraded to the latest and greatest TeXLive (2010), I am having problems with some AMS fonts: < godel:Admin/sparc > dvips courses This is dvips(k) 5.99 Copyright 2010 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2011.02.06:1853' -> courses.ps kpathsea:

[Fink-users] Xpdf is weird after upgrade

Hi, Having upgraded from xpdf_3.02-1003 to xpdf_3.02.5-1 I noticed that the latter behaves weirdly. It opens the bookmark side pane (or whatever the name of that is) even if a document has no bookmarks. Problem is, the said side pane eats into the document area (which is not resized). Closing th

Re: [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

Hi, Thank you first of all for the quick response. At 21:54 +0900 on 2011-2-8 Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > I've reported the problem to Mr. Kakuto (patch developer), > and he has just updated the patch: > http://w32tex.org/generic/dvipsk-TL2010-fix.diff > which seems to fix the problem in 64b

  1   2   >