Howdy,
I got this failure when I tried upgrading to fink 0.25.2 today. I
could not find any answers in the FAQ. My apologies if I missed it.
Thanks in advance.
Payam
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Fink-users] updating fink for XCode 2.2
Anthony Underwood wrote:
> I am having problems with fink and XCode 2.2. The problem is with GCC
4.0.1
> not being recognised as GCC 4. I understand that fink should now work with
&
Anthony Underwood wrote:
I am having problems with fink and XCode 2.2. The problem is with GCC 4.0.1
not being recognised as GCC 4. I understand that fink should now work with
XCode 2.2. I presume I should update fink with the latest unstable release.
The problem is that I am behind a restrictive
en [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 16:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Fink-users] updating fink for XCode 2.2
On 1/18/06, Anthony Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having problems with fink and XCode 2.2. The problem is w
On 1/18/06, Anthony Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having problems with fink and XCode 2.2. The problem is with GCC 4.0.1
> not being recognised as GCC 4. I understand that fink should now work with
> XCode 2.2. I presume I should update fink with the latest unstable release.
> The pro
I am having problems with fink and XCode 2.2. The problem is with GCC 4.0.1
not being recognised as GCC 4. I understand that fink should now work with
XCode 2.2. I presume I should update fink with the latest unstable release.
The problem is that I am behind a restrictive firewall that does not all
Martin Costabel wrote:
Paul Dorman wrote:
I have system 10.2, and fink 0.5.4. I had 0.5.3, but when I ran
"selfupdate" it only updated to 0.5.4, which it claims is the latest
release, whereas the website says 0.6.3 should be the latest for
10.2.
You need to have "10.2-gcc3.3" instead of "10.2"
Martin Costabel wrote:
Paul Dorman wrote:
I have system 10.2, and fink 0.5.4. I had 0.5.3, but when I ran
"selfupdate" it only updated to 0.5.4, which it claims is the latest
release, whereas the website says 0.6.3 should be the latest for 10.2.
You need to have "10.2-gcc3.3" instead of "1
Paul Dorman wrote:
I have system 10.2, and fink 0.5.4. I had 0.5.3, but when I ran
"selfupdate" it only updated to 0.5.4, which it claims is the latest
release, whereas the website says 0.6.3 should be the latest for 10.2.
You need to have "10.2-gcc3.3" instead of "10.2" both in the
"Distrib
I have system 10.2, and fink 0.5.4. I had 0.5.3, but when I ran
"selfupdate" it only updated to 0.5.4, which it claims is the latest
release, whereas the website says 0.6.3 should be the latest for 10.2.
Am I missing something here?
Thanks,
Paul
-
Sylvaine BORTHELLE wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading my system from 10.2.8 to 10.3 (and upgrading the developer tools also), I
tried to upgrade fink. Here is the end of the message I get what I get when I launch 'fink
selfupdate':
[]
Creating postinstall script...
#make test
Can't exec "#make": No
Hello,
After upgrading my system from 10.2.8 to 10.3 (and upgrading the developer tools
also), I
tried to upgrade fink. Here is the end of the message I get what I get when I launch
'fink
selfupdate':
./setup.sh /sw
Creating fink...
Creating fink-virtual-pkgs...
Creating pathsetup.command...
Thanks, Martin. That fixed the problem!
Artemio
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 06:10 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
On mercredi, déc 11, 2002, at 17:40 Europe/Paris, Artemio
Gonzalez-Lopez wrote:
[]
File: fink-0.11.0-1.infoStatus: Up-to-date
[]
=
On mercredi, déc 11, 2002, at 17:40 Europe/Paris, Artemio
Gonzalez-Lopez wrote:
[]
File: fink-0.11.0-1.infoStatus: Up-to-date
[]
===
File: fink-0.11.1-10.info Status: Up-to-date
OK, so it wasn't what I suspected, bu
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 11:27 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Artemio Gonzalez-Lopez wrote:
It doesn't seem to work. Here's the output I get after executing
"fink selfupdate-cvs":
pkg fink version ###
pkg fink version 0.11.0-1
This is completely impossible ;-)
I wish it were! :-)
Artemio Gonzalez-Lopez wrote:
It doesn't seem to work. Here's the output I get after executing "fink
selfupdate-cvs":
pkg fink version ###
pkg fink version 0.11.0-1
This is completely impossible ;-)
It would be interesting to see the output of
cd /sw/fink/10.2/stable/main/finkinfo/base/
cvs
It doesn't seem to work. Here's the output I get after executing "fink
selfupdate-cvs":
pkg fink version ###
pkg fink version 0.11.0-1
pkg tar version ###
pkg tar version 1.13.25-1
pkg gettext version ###
pkg gettext version 0.10.40-3
pkg ncurses version ###
pkg ncurses version 5.2-9
pkg
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 03:20 PM, Artemio Gonzalez-Lopez
wrote:
I 've successfully installed the source distribution of fink 0.5.0a.
However, after installing it the fink package manager is still at
version 0.11.0, instead of 0.11.1. Also, "fink list" reports that fink
is up to dat
I 've successfully installed the source distribution of fink 0.5.0a.
However, after installing it the fink package manager is still at
version 0.11.0, instead of 0.11.1. Also, "fink list" reports that fink
is up to date, so I can't
upgrade by hand it by executing "fink update fink". Does anybody
> Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 16:47:20 +0100
> From: Riccardo Gusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
.
> So there's another thing I don't understand: from dselect in fact I see
> that
> pan version I have installed is 0.11.1-1 and all other packages
> installed
> are of the same version of the one availabl
Since I haven't received an answer to this question I try to reformulate it
with a more specific subject.
Il 28-02-2002 20:29, David R. Morrison da [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> Riccardo Gusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds like you have a rather old fink distribution! According to the
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 08:22 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 8:05 Uhr -0500 22.02.2002, Erik Price wrote:
>> Max: you know about this issue -- should something be added to the
>> FAQ? If you're busy I can write up a quick description of what to do
>> and you can add it, unless you think t
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 05:22 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 8:05 Uhr -0500 22.02.2002, Erik Price wrote:
>> Max: you know about this issue -- should something be added to the
>> FAQ? If you're busy I can write up a quick description of what to do
>> and you can add it, unless you think tha
At 8:05 Uhr -0500 22.02.2002, Erik Price wrote:
>Max: you know about this issue -- should something be added to the
>FAQ? If you're busy I can write up a quick description of what to
>do and you can add it, unless you think that the next version is
>coming out soon.
>
Yes, this should definit
Max: you know about this issue -- should something be added to the FAQ?
If you're busy I can write up a quick description of what to do and you
can add it, unless you think that the next version is coming out soon.
Erik
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 04:15 AM, Joseph Bauer wrote:
> Am F
Am Freitag den, 22. Februar 2002, um 05:59, schrieb Rudolf B. Blazek:
Hello,
I have a binary distribution of Fink. I have tried to run 'fink selfupdate', but that failed with the following message:
> fink selfupdate
rm -f LATEST-FINK
curl -L -s -S -O http://fink.sourceforge.net/LATEST-F
Hello,
I have a binary distribution of Fink. I have tried to run 'fink
selfupdate', but that failed with the following message:
> fink selfupdate
rm -f LATEST-FINK
curl -L -s -S -O http://fink.sourceforge.net/LATEST-FINK
I will now download the package descriptions for Fink 0.3.2a a
27 matches
Mail list logo
