On Sat, 19 Jun 2010, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> See /sw/share/doc/bash/README.Fink for configuration advice.
> ...
>
> Check that out and see if it has information on how to make it your
> default.
The file header reads:
This installation of bash has been set up to use an init system similar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/19/10 3:37 PM, Ingo Thies wrote:
>
> On Sat, June 19, 2010 17:18, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> Try "apt-cache policy ffmpeg" (either with Fink or Debian).
>
> Thanks. According to this, ffmpeg 0.6 is running on my office computer
> while 0.4.2
On Sat, June 19, 2010 17:18, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Try "apt-cache policy ffmpeg" (either with Fink or Debian).
Thanks. According to this, ffmpeg 0.6 is running on my office computer
while 0.4.2 from Fink.
> It depends on what you need. If you don't need the functionality from
> bash-4, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/19/10 11:13 AM, Ingo Thies wrote:
> On Sat, June 19, 2010 14:59, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>
>> You need to pad %d as %03d for 001, 002, etc. thought that will still
>> fail here at the end.
>
> Ah, strange. On Linux you also have to exact
On Sat, June 19, 2010 14:59, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> You need to pad %d as %03d for 001, 002, etc. thought that will still
> fail here at the end.
Ah, strange. On Linux you also have to exactly specify the number format,
but if something's wrong, ffmpeg just complains about files that c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/19/10 3:07 AM, Ingo Thies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, June 19, 2010 00:15, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> Also, does the example command work with the existing ffmpeg?
>
> Unfortunately not, and I am getting more and more the suspicion that the
> in
On 6/19/10 3:07 AM, Ingo Thies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, June 19, 2010 00:15, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> Also, does the example command work with the existing ffmpeg?
>
> Unfortunately not, and I am getting more and more the suspicion that the
> installation is somewhat corrupted:
>
> Actually, I
Hi,
On Sat, June 19, 2010 00:15, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Also, does the example command work with the existing ffmpeg?
Unfortunately not, and I am getting more and more the suspicion that the
installation is somewhat corrupted:
Actually, I tried the command
ffmpeg -f image2 -i sph.gif.%d sph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/18/10 4:12 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> On 6/18/10 4:06 PM, Ingo Thies wrote:
>> Hi Hanspeter,
>>
>>> Fink's ffmpeg is currently 2 years old, so it is possible that joining
>>> pictures into a movie doesn't work in that version. The main
On 6/18/10 4:06 PM, Ingo Thies wrote:
> Hi Hanspeter,
>
>> Fink's ffmpeg is currently 2 years old, so it is possible that joining
>> pictures into a movie doesn't work in that version. The maintainer has
>> been busy and unable to update to the newer version.
>
> Ah, I'm a bit surprised about this
Hi Hanspeter,
> Fink's ffmpeg is currently 2 years old, so it is possible that joining
> pictures into a movie doesn't work in that version. The maintainer has
> been busy and unable to update to the newer version.
Ah, I'm a bit surprised about this. I'd have thought that combining images
into
On 6/18/10 3:04 PM, Ingo Thies wrote:
> Dear Users,
>
> I have recently installes ffmpeg in order to get some functionality I am
> used to on Linux. There I am using ffmpeg to combine a series of jpegs
> into one mpeg video. However, only after installation I got the suspicion
> that this ffmpeg ve
Dear Users,
I have recently installes ffmpeg in order to get some functionality I am
used to on Linux. There I am using ffmpeg to combine a series of jpegs
into one mpeg video. However, only after installation I got the suspicion
that this ffmpeg version has far less functionality than the Debi
13 matches
Mail list logo
