Another issue: I tried this Cahn Hilliard example
http://pastebin.com/9UZJ2h24 with trilinos instead of pysparse, and the
results seem to differ. The phase separation doesn't seem to occur with the
trilinos solver.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Jane Hung wrote:
> Could you give more
Wheeler
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jane Hung wrote:
> > Actually I got it working in Ubuntu, but the parallel implementation
> doesn't
> > give expected results, as in different from running in serial. The
> > parallelization setup seems fine from the comman
Actually I got it working in Ubuntu, but the parallel implementation
doesn't give expected results, as in different from running in serial. The
parallelization setup seems fine from the command line test on the site. Do
periodic grids work when running in parallel? If not, how could periodic
bounda
7;s little point in running a simulation under these
> conditions.
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Jane Hung
> wrote:
>
> > I'm using PySparse
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27 PM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. <
> jonathan.gu...@nist.gov> wrote:
> &g
I'm using PySparse
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27 PM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. <
jonathan.gu...@nist.gov> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Jane Hung wrote:
>
>> The vector formulation is still rather slow (much much slower than with
just one equation). Is that expected?
&g
hether the issues described in that ticket are the source of
> what you're seeing, but it can't help. For your problem, you may want to
> base what you're doing on the vector formulation in that example.
>
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Jane Hung wrote:
>
> >
can't deal with my more complicated coupled system. Is this expected
behavior? Is there any way to speed things up so that my system has a
chance of running at all?
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Jane Hung wrote:
> Yes, restricting the time step works. However, whenever I split up t
. I happened
to see your message at home, so could download the movie independent of the
NIST network, but that's not normally true. If you have large files to
share with us in the future, let us know and we can provide a place to put
them.
On Jan 10, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Jane Hung wrote:
I tri
/nocwmh8x1f5b6rw/1_order_parameter.mp4), the error
increases a lot. I'd like to see what happens after more iterations, so is
there a way to keep the error small?
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Wheeler
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Jane Hung wrote:
> > I&
;t
have an analytical solution.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Wheeler
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jane Hung wrote:
> > Now that I've changed it as you mentioned, it says Can't expand MemType
> 0.
> > What can I do about this?
>
> Maybe run
Now that I've changed it as you mentioned, it says Can't expand MemType 0.
What can I do about this?
http://pastebin.com/buFS1NRu
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Daniel Wheeler
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jane Hung wrote:
> > That definitely helps the simu
implementation combining fourth order
> diffusion terms and coupled equations can't be trusted.
>
> --
> Daniel Wheeler
> ___
> fipy mailing list
> fipy@nist.gov
> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
> [ NIST internal ONLY: https:/
ot;. It'll be a "FaceVariable" in its current form. Change
> the outermost "faceGrad" to "grad" and things should work.
--
> Daniel Wheeler
> ___
> fipy mailing list
> fipy@nist.gov
> http://www.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
