Has anyone reviewed the methodology and findings of the new Stanford study?
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/november/donohue-guns-study-111414.html
___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change
It would be impossible to declare all ammo illegal. Rights must be exercisable
and outlawing all ammunition would moot the right. This would be, on its face,
unconstitutional.
On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Paul Laska dactylographer...@gmail.com wrote:
Not being a lawyer, capable of
I believe that is an ethical requirement to inform the patient AFTER the
information is released, nothing at like Miranda.
On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Phil Lee maryland_al...@yahoo.com wrote:
There is a miranda-like requirement in the AMA code of conduct: When the
disclosure of
I would like to think that most people see that as an indicator that they need
a new Dr. not a new law, but maybe I give them credit for too much love of
liberty.
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:42 PM, James Heath heath.seat...@gmail.com wrote:
If a doctor asks what brand tires you have on your car
I believe that testimony can be forced if the state waives the right to
prosecute for any crimes revealed. I.e. if immunity is offered they can force
you to speak.
On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Phil Lee maryland_al...@yahoo.com wrote:
I intended to give one example where the right to not
Improve your sexuality!. http://lausitz-tank.de/friends_links.php?iqjhot=47me3
___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
As you are most likely aware I didn't intentionally send spam to the list.
Unfortunately my email acct. got compromised. I've changed the password and
hope that no more damage gets done.
I'm sorry for any inconvenience the email may have caused you.
Best,
Dan
Nor should you pay attention to those who have multiple semantic and
grammatical errors in the first paragraph of an attack.
From: Joseph E. Olson jol...@gw.hamline.edu
To: Charles Curley charlescur...@charlescurley.com;
firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 4, 2011 4:09
I think that we can safely assume that the framers would not commit 10% of the
Bill of Rights to a meaningless right. If that is the case then which of
your presuppositions is inaccurate?
Not every state has a militia. Merely having the physical strength to fire a
gun does not make one
Scalia is always a joy to read. I suspect that the fact Justice Scalia and
Justice Stevens will no longer be sitting on the court together it was a bit
easier to write the truth.
From: Guy Smith g...@gunfacts.info
To: firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Mon,
if the transfer is done with the express permission
of the parent or legal guardian of the minor.
From: John M. Maraldo johnmmara...@sbcglobal.net
To: Daniel D. Todd dant...@yahoo.com; C. D. Tavares c...@libertyhaven.com;
Firearmsregprof firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Tue, May 25, 2010 2:38:20 PM
I presume that the AP reporter like most is either in or from NYC. Gun permits
are required for ownership in NYC. It is completely logical for someone who
lives in a place that requires permits (and isn't firearms savvy) would have
the mindset that permits are required everywhere. so, asking
I agree that there is a distinct possibility in our world today. However; it is
wrong to assume that we can simply go around fearing crime. Fighting crime? OK.
Working to prevent crime? OK. Ensuring that those caught committing crime are
punished? OK. Living on the San Francisco Peninsula about
There are fairly cheap tools for automatic index building that work with pdf
files.
Seems like less than $200 and a very few hours of student time could get what
you want.
Here are a few that a quick google turned up.
http://www.pdfindexgenerator.com/ ($30)
Does anyone know the timeline to hear if the 9th took a vote and the results?
If no one calls for a vote or if the vote fails will there definitely be a
memorandum on their website? Is it possible that they don't vote to take the
case en banc and don't make ANY announcement since the en banc
This sounds bizarre. So, when the police see this guy at the range on Saturday
do they get to arrest him again? After all his affirmative defense is only
against the charge in question. This doesn't return his second amendment
rights in any way. Isn't this essentially judicially guided jury
. This is
not likely to be the case and moving now to define the limits of governmental
interference is important while we do have a SCOTUS that is not adverse to an
armed citizenry.
- Original Message
From: Philip F. Lee pf...@wdn.com
To: Daniel D. Todd dant...@yahoo.com; Firearmsregprof
if you take this to the next level a common use law could preclude
the introduction of any new cartridge or even any new weapon using an
existing cartridge.
This
is why it is necessary for those knowledgeable about arms to develop
an acceptable taxonomy to help the courts in determining what is
To the best of my knowledge there is no concept of an assault rifle in
California law. They define an assault weapon as any of a number of specific
rifle and pistol models plus those identified by containing certain features.
The relevant PC is here: http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/dwcl/12275.php
Don't have the article but I've included the most likely candidates where I
know them.
To: firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:31:21 AM
Subject: post-Heller cases question
The New England Journal of Medicine published another anti-gun rights essay.
I don't
Sorry meant US v. Hayes not White.
http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=United_States_v._Hayes
Still a previous DV misdemeanor conviction not an RO specific issue.
- Original Message
From: Daniel D. Todd dant...@yahoo.com
To: Joe Rickershauser rick...@tiac.net; firearmsregprof
Not a shall issue thing but is it this:
http://www.isp.state.il.us/foid/ordinances.cfm
Public Act 92-0238, Illinois Compiled Statutes (430 ILCS 65/13.3), approved on
August 3, 2001, amends the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. This
amendment requires that within 6 months after the
22 matches
Mail list logo
