try to use the same ssd and install windows server 2012r2, windows
server 2016 or windows server 2019 and try it again and you will see
what i talk about
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Holger Klemt
Am 03.03.2020 um 14:10 schrieb Carlos H. Cantu:
Re: [Firebird-devel] Interbase vs
Title: Re: [Firebird-devel] Interbase vs Firebird by Embarcadero
Hi Holger,
I got curious on this: "Using nvme ssds on windows server OS without proper driver support always results in very poor performance"
I have Samsung EVO nvme ssd in my Windows 10 development machine and never n
Sean,
on the machine i tested it and in the config i tested based on what i
was able to find from their description
to have a similar test environment, yes, the resulting number that was
reported in the test was more or less
the same for both platforms, but i expect, that this was more or less
Holger,
Please clarify
> i had discusses their benchmark results already with a embarcadero
> employee in a german forum and they insisted that tpc was bad
> with firebird and good with interbase.
>
> When i reproduced their description of the test on a known powerful firebird
> machine and ex
All my experience is same, FB is better then Interbase. FB miss some features
available in Interbase but Interbase miss so many features available in FB then
+ is for FB.I only cannot accept that you say same about Delphi. It is
something totally different.It is for me personally the best progra
i had discusses their benchmark results already with a embarcadero
employee in a german forum
and they insisted that tpc was bad with firebird and good with interbase.
When i reproduced their description of the test on a known powerful
firebird machine
and exactly the same hardware and same OS
>>>It is available at https://cc.embarcadero.com/item/30771 but I have no
>>> idea if you can get license for it now.
>>>
>>>
>>That link is only for existing, registered, users.
>>Paul
try this one
https://cc.embarcadero.com/Item/30065
you must register - but this is free trial no paid lic
26.02.2020 18:00, Paul Reeves wrote:
It seems to contain two contradictory statements. On the one hand it says:
The journal file I/O is always synchronous and cannot be altered
Synchronous from the filesystem POV. Like with FW=ON for Firebird, but
applies only to journal files.
and in an
26.02.2020 17:35, Paul Reeves wrote:
The idea of the failsafe comparison is valid but it depends on how they have
configured journalling.
The common trick for benchmarking is to set up a very long (practically
infinite from the test POV) checkpoint interval. It provides the best
possible per
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:48:29 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 26.02.2020 15:39, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > Been there, looked at that :-)
> >
> > AFAICT it is for InterBase 2020 which is only available for Windows at the
> > moment. The tests in the article were done with XE7. And my test rig uses
26.02.2020 15:39, Paul Reeves wrote:
Been there, looked at that :-)
AFAICT it is for InterBase 2020 which is only available for Windows at the
moment. The tests in the article were done with XE7. And my test rig uses
linux. So I need a version of XE7 for linux.
It is available at https://cc
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:35:16 +0100 I wrote:
> The idea of the failsafe comparison is valid but it depends on how they have
> configured journalling. Under light load the cost of journalling will
> have limited impact as it will almost certainly be cached.
The journalling documentation is here.
h
> What will be very interesting re journalling - compare interbase with
> journalling and async writes vs. interbase without journalling and sync
> writes.
> This can give us an idea what effect does journalling give.
Actually in order to be failsafe, journaling would also need to use sync/ful
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:23:32 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 26.02.2020 13:46, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > If anyone can let me have a copy of InterBase XE7 I would be happy to run
> > some proper comparisons on our test rig.
>
>Developers Edition is free to download from Embarcadero web site
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:28:38 +0300
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 2020-02-26 15:46, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > AFAICT most of the content of that document is rubbish. They have
> > certainly skewed our support costs heavily, using the most extreme
> > examples.
>
> It's also unclear
26.02.2020 14:28, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
What will be very interesting re journalling - compare interbase with journalling and
async writes vs. interbase without journalling and sync writes. This can give us an idea
what effect does journalling give.
Or compare Interbase+jou
On 2020-02-26 15:46, Paul Reeves wrote:
AFAICT most of the content of that document is rubbish. They have certainly
skewed our support costs heavily, using the most extreme examples.
It's also unclear what point version of FB3 was used - 3.0.0 or
something newer like 3.0.4. I'm sure they give
26.02.2020 13:46, Paul Reeves wrote:
If anyone can let me have a copy of InterBase XE7 I would be happy to run
some proper comparisons on our test rig.
Developers Edition is free to download from Embarcadero web site:
https://www.embarcadero.com/products/interbase/developer/free-download
AFAICT most of the content of that document is rubbish. They have certainly
skewed our support costs heavily, using the most extreme examples.
The tpc-c performance figures look extremely suspect. Does anyone seriously
do tpc-c testing with 2 warehouses? It doesn't make sense to me.
Looking at
Hi
Embarcadero provide in marketing materials comparision about Interbase vs
Firebird
https://www.embarcadero.com/products/interbase/compare/interbase_firebird
and comparision to others
https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/b/blog/posts/interbase-isv-database-comparison?utm_source=Eloqua&utm
20 matches
Mail list logo
