Hi,
Dne 01. 02. 19 v 14:10 Karol Bieniaszewski liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support] napsal(a):
>>> You completely misunderstood the announcement. The Firebird Butler is a
>>> thing that we develop.
>
> I am really interested if i am only one And because of this i am talking
> about
>>You completely misunderstood the announcement. The Firebird Butler is a
>>thing that we develop.
I am really interested if i am only one And because of this i am talking
about any example as a first steep.
>> Steam-like deployment platform for Butler services provided by Firebird
Ok,
Hi,
Dne 01. 02. 19 v 8:04 Karol Bieniaszewski liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support] napsal(a):
>
> If you or someone can show me (and maybe others are also interested) any real
> benefit, example, than i am more than interested in this.
> And i am not only interested in using it, but
Hi,
Dne 31. 01. 19 v 20:54 blackfalconsoftw...@outlook.com
[firebird-support] napsal(a):
> II...
> My understanding of the Firebird Butler project could be two-fold...
> A specification for best practices for developing distributed systems using
> the Firebird Database Engine A set of
Hi,
Dne 31. 01. 19 v 21:05 blackfalconsoftw...@outlook.com
[firebird-support] napsal(a):
>
> Has anyone considered using ZeroC's Ice Framework?
Ice is classic RPC framework with all its limits and drawbacks. We think
that RPC is wrong abstraction model to create dynamic heterogeneous
Thank you to be involved into discussion.
But i am still oposite. Example do not required any unique description.
Example is not less/more than only shortcut to description. It is introduction
to description.
Description can talk about example or will be totally unreleated.
But example is
Just a question about the use of ZeroMQ...
Has anyone considered using ZeroC's Ice Framework?
It appears to be a much more finished product with better diocumentation than
ZeroMQ and is completely Open Source...
Steve Naidamast
Sr. Software Engineer
I have two comments on this thread...
I...
The examples provided (I & II) do not necessarily show a correct pattern of
either. In the first example, the assumption can be made that the description
is unique and thus requires a unique example.
The second is merely a reverse of the
