There are always better things one can spend their time on... of course,
since this list is a pre-selected roster of geeks, wasting a few minutes
bantering about ascii-art is the normal-person equivalent of discussing the
latest football game. :-)
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 20:41, Robert Shinka wrot
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:36:45AM -0500, Myrddin Emrys wrote:
> The problem with that logo, nice as it is, is that the > should be on the
> right (as the final prompt character) rather than the left.
> And as far as pretty prompts... I'm of the opinion that they are a waste of
> space overall,
OK good. Then what's wrong with the current Fish logo?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Terin Stock wrote:
My beef with the ASCII art is that it doesn't seem all that friendly, in
> reality quiet the opposite. Hackers and programmers (arguably one in the
> same) like ASCII art, but not your ave
Can I be honest for a second? Yes, good.
I think I see where you're going with the ASCII art, but I'm not digging it.
It doesn't convey the right feel. fish is supposed to be the Friendly
Interactive Shell, so a more traditional and indentifible logo should be
used.
My beef with the ASCII art is
OK, I'm not particularly attached to it.
I see why ">" has to be the final character. The real Fish prompt is
incorporated into the logo, though it's not the whole logo.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:47 AM, David Frascone wrote:
> I don't see a fish there. I see a comic strip's attempt at profan
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM, David Frascone wrote:
>
> I don't see a fish there. I see a comic strip's attempt at profanity.
> Maybe reversed with the fish head pointing toward the prompt?:
> ><~(*>
>< (*>
Looks better IMHO
--
I don't see a fish there. I see a comic strip's attempt at profanity.
Maybe reversed with the fish head pointing toward the prompt?:
><~(*>
-Dave
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Myrddin Emrys wrote:
> The problem with that logo, nice as it is, is that the > should be on the
> right (as the
The problem with that logo, nice as it is, is that the > should be on the
right (as the final prompt character) rather than the left.
And as far as pretty prompts... I'm of the opinion that they are a waste of
space overall, but I think that it would be a nice little thing to have on,
perhaps, the
One more try.
<*)~><
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Patrick Mc(avery <
patr...@spellingbeewinnars.org> wrote:
> Hi Philip
>
> I like the gills on this one,
>
> <*)><
>
> -Patrick
>
>
> On 11-07-08 07:56 PM, Philip Ganchev wrote:
>>
>> I am not opposed to a new logo, though I don't consider it
I'd be happy to add it to my hosting account. Costs me almost nothing (like
$.82/month, for new shared domains)
-Dave
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Terin Stock wrote:
> I paid anynomously last year, which is why it hasn't gone to squatters yet.
>
> Gandi also allows putting another person
I paid anynomously last year, which is why it hasn't gone to squatters yet.
Gandi also allows putting another person in charge of the administration,
without transferring the domain, which is what I'm trying to get Mike to do, if
I could get ahold of him. (Been unsuccessful so far)
--
#Terin S
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 02:30:53PM -0600, Terin Stock wrote:
> I can almost guarentee we won't get it.
>
> After the domain expires, there's a month holding period, then it's released
> to the general public.
>
> Who do you think will get it first? Mere humans, or squatter network machine?
fish
On 10 July 2011 11:36, Robert Shinka wrote:
> https://gitorious.org/fish-shell indicates that the website for fish is
> fishshell.org, which should be changed to fishshell.com for the time
> being.
>
>
Done. I updated the gitorious page to point to fishshell.com.
> If development for fish is
I can almost guarentee we won't get it.
After the domain expires, there's a month holding period, then it's released to
the general public.
Who do you think will get it first? Mere humans, or squatter network machine?
--
#Terin Stock
Undergraduate, Computer Science (CISE), University of Florid
Agreed. And I would suggest that we register fishshell.org when its
old registration expires on September 18 (see
http://whois.domaintools.com/fishshell.org). We are not a .com, after
all.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Robert Shinka wrote:
> https://gitorious.org/fish-shell indicates that the w
https://gitorious.org/fish-shell indicates that the website for fish is
fishshell.org, which should be changed to fishshell.com for the time being.
If development for fish is going to remain on gitorious, I'll update the
freshmeat project page to include that as well.
---
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:11 AM, i...@whywouldwe.com wrote:
> An ascii art prompt would be very cool
>
> user@host:/dir/dir2 ><(*>
> user@host:/dir/dir2 ><~*>
> user@host:/dir/dir2 ><@*>
>
Cool it may be, just please don't make it default... ;-)
---
An ascii art prompt would be very cool
user@host:/dir/dir2 ><(*>
user@host:/dir/dir2 ><~*>
user@host:/dir/dir2 ><@*>
On 09/07/2011 06:56, Philip Ganchev wrote:
> I am not opposed to a new logo, though I don't consider it important.
> There is no problem with someone having the trademark to the
Moving to github is the obvious thing to
do in order to attract new developers.
If this is the chosen path the account
username should be something like
'fish-shell' and not contain any other
projects so that it can easily be passed
on to another person (at a later stage
if necessary).
On
I think we should push a release. And, possibly, bump the version to a
milestone of some kind to indicate the new "ownership"
There have been several minor nits fixed. I need to document and/or fix a
few more that I've noticed, where fish gets confused and spews text at me
instead of completing
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Terin Stock wrote:
> Yeah, I'm probably fine being a mirror (fair use), but once we start to go
> forward, could be interesting.
> A new logo would be nice, signify a new future for the project. I would
> also, personally, like to see a new release from the "Fish Sh
Hi Philip
I like the gills on this one,
<*)><
-Patrick
On 11-07-08 07:56 PM, Philip Ganchev wrote:
> I am not opposed to a new logo, though I don't consider it important.
> There is no problem with someone having the trademark to the project's
> logo. If you do design a new logo, it might be c
I am not opposed to a new logo, though I don't consider it important.
There is no problem with someone having the trademark to the project's
logo. If you do design a new logo, it might be cool to incorporate the
Fish prompt, "~>", into it. Or you can use other ASCII art:
<*)><
<@><
<*~><
Cheers
Yeah, I'm probably fine being a mirror (fair use), but once we start to go
forward, could be interesting.
A new logo would be nice, signify a new future for the project. I would also,
personally, like to see a new release from the "Fish Shell Maintainers" or
something, to show that we're not a
Hi Terin, hi List
I am afraid I don't know enough ruby to help.
If Axel is done with us should we create another fish logo? I doubt he
trademarked fishshell but the fish shell logo is trademarked by
default. I can create one and mail thumbnail photos to the list? It
might take some time thou
It's a standard Linux stack. Right now the main site is static content. I'm
currently working on migrating to Redmine
--
#Terin Stock
Undergraduate, Computer Science (CISE), University of Florida
On Friday, July 8, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
> So I don't actually know who is in c
Heya Patrick,
Nice to see the jolt of energy. :) I keep wanting to help with this project
as well (fish is cool), but time seems to fight me.
As well as the work on github, there's also the codebase over at gitorious (
https://gitorious.org/fish-shell). It has seen a bit of bugfix and feature
a
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:27 PM, David Frascone wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Patrick Mc(avery <
> patr...@spellingbeewinnars.org> wrote:
>>
>> 4)There is some development being done on github but the site does not
>> currently point there
>> Please correct false statements...
>>
>>
>
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Patrick Mc(avery <
patr...@spellingbeewinnars.org> wrote:
>
> 4)There is some development being done on github but the site does not
> currently point there
> Please correct false statements...
>
>
I believe the current repositories are on gitorious.
-Dave
-
"" lets hack!"
Indeed!
So again I am the newbie and might not have things straight
1)fishshell.org is expiring in September and presumably Axel won't renew
but Terin Stock has volunteered to shoulder this
2)fishshell.com is the interim site and has code mirrored from
fishshell.org before
30 matches
Mail list logo
