RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-24 Thread Darren Houle
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:33:13 +0200 Hi Darren, I developed my webservices such that you have to supply a security token in the header section of a SOAP operation. By using

[flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-24 Thread Dave Wolf
Given our own license we will almost always look towards developing on a J2EE infrastructure running on Apache Tomcat using Apache AXIS SOAP web services. This platform provides unquestioned scalability and reliability. Flex integrates absolutely seamlessly into this environment inlcuding RPC,

[flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-24 Thread Derek Adams
WS-Security is the standard spec for securing web service calls. Most web service stacks have some level of support for it. Among the things it offers are username/token style security and encryption of some/all of the SOAP envelope. There is an overview and a few good links here:

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-24 Thread Franck de Bruijn
systems - which provides best functionality WS-Security is the standard spec for securing web service calls. Most web service stacks have some level of support for it. Among the things it offers are username/token style security and encryption of some/all of the SOAP envelope

[flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-23 Thread Steven Toth
I think one thing not given enough consideration in this discussion is cost. We've been developing an enterprise-type application in Flex 2 and initially chose to use AMF Remoting. At the time, the licensing costs were not available. However, now that we know it will cost us $20K per CPU

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-23 Thread Darren Houle
securely link them together? Darren From: Franck de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:03:24 +0200 Hi Barry, I’m

[flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-23 Thread Dave Wolf
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:03:24 +0200 Hi Barry, I'm not sure if I can be of much help here. I'm not into PHP, I'm not into FDS and remoting and the AMF protocol

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-23 Thread Darren Houle
de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:03:24 +0200 Hi Barry, I'm not sure if I can be of much help

[flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-23 Thread Dave Wolf
securely link them together? Darren From: Franck de Bruijn franck.de.bruijn@ Reply-To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:03

[flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-22 Thread barry.beattie
Franck and Doug: may I be so bold as to include here some information I sent to our programming team for them to have some context? I offer it here as a talking point only - and would invite any comments or corrections to help me gain a better understanding myself ... this has just been gathered

[flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-22 Thread rhlarochelle
Franck, I appreciate your respons. When you say Remote Objects/Flex Data Services provides the most advanced way of interoperating with the backend, what specifically is possible? What are the capabilities that I would get leveraging Remote Objects/Flex Data Services that I would not get (or

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-22 Thread Franck de Bruijn
] On Behalf Of barry.beattie Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:50 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality Franck and Doug: may I be so bold as to include here some information I sent to our programming team

RE: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-22 Thread Shannon Hicks
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rhlarochelleSent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:27 AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality Franck,I appreciate your respons. When you say Remote Objects/Flex DataServices provid

Re: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-22 Thread Douglas Knudsen
. Hope this points you in the right direction. Shan From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rhlarochelleSent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:27 AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems

Re: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides best functionality

2006-08-22 Thread Douglas Knudsen
systems - which provides best functionality Franck,I appreciate your respons. When you say Remote Objects/Flex DataServices provides the most advanced way of interoperating with thebackend, what specifically is possible?What are the capabilities that I would get leveraging RemoteObjects/Flex