i have to say, if your entire application is currently in one mxml file- i'm
betting it's not a 'huge' application by any means- if that's the case and
you want to organize your code into a framework of some sort, i would put my
money on puremvc, i've been down that road and cairngorm was way overk
On Oct 25, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Jon Bradley wrote:
Even then... I believe it should be noted that Cairngorm is more
than just an MVC architecture. There are a variety of patterns
involved in using the framework, not the least of which is MVC.
Even then, i don't think it really has a fully qua
Even then... I believe it should be noted that Cairngorm is more than
just an MVC architecture. There are a variety of patterns involved in
using the framework, not the least of which is MVC.
Even then, i don't think it really has a fully qualified MVC pattern
because there are no specific
great workflow and visual documentation.
- Tangent
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dimitrios Gianninas
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:43 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Components best practices for a newb
You are looking for an architecture :) One of the most popular for Flex is
Cairngorm, check it out here: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Cairngorm
But yes, you should definily break things out into their own components, the
smaller the better, it will help you manage code, more easily add
sounds like you need a framework, check out cairngorm or pureMVC (
puremvc.org), they have lots of tutorials and example apps.
On 10/25/07, Phill B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm putting together my first Flex app and need some help. I have all
> my code in one mxml file and it is getting h
6 matches
Mail list logo