On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Bob McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank and I differ. The ultimate capabilities are profoundly revolutionary,
> as revolutionary an impact on radio as say CW Skimmer is having on CW
> contesting/operating. That said, the opening salvos will be functional,
>
Quoting Lee Mushel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sun 27 Jul 2008
03:32:01 PM PDT:
> I just got up from my nap to see the cognitive contesting business and I
> will admit that something that complex offers more than a few interesting
> aspects but you've not considered the *missing link*! I see preci
Quoting Lee A Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sun 27 Jul 2008
12:59:11 PM PDT:
>
> This is why flexwire is so much more than just a bus to run some
> relays, and why it will be important to be able to distribute
> functionality across a network. Flexwire is a master-slave/
> master-mas
Frank and I differ. The ultimate capabilities are profoundly revolutionary,
as revolutionary an impact on radio as say CW Skimmer is having on CW
contesting/operating. That said, the opening salvos will be functional,
not glitzy and the glitz will come with time.
Bob
ARRL SDR Working Group Ch
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Lee A Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Why a subcarrier? just make it the contest exchange
Two reasons:
(1) So it can be decoded automatically by a simple demod, rather than (say)
an open-speaker-set voice transcription, by a program sucking in all
availabl
Why a subcarrier? just make it the contest exchange
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.b
I just got up from my nap to see the cognitive contesting business and I
will admit that something that complex offers more than a few interesting
aspects but you've not considered the *missing link*! I see precious few
cognitive operators and an amazing number of ideas that I don't understand.
H
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Robert Dennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been in a few sports (like fencing) where automation basically
> ruined what was a very interesting activity...
Oh, well, you can be sure there will be contesting. It's like, around the
world, give a few kids a f
Hey Frank,
Like your thoughts...
I've been in a few sports (like fencing) where automation basically
ruined what was a very interesting activity. Your thoughts could well
prevent that from happening in Ham radio contesting!!Stick with it!
73's
Rob
AB7CF
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:57:59 -0
The Contest SDR will have far more capability. The whole gig about contesting
is probability and maximizing efficiencies and there now exist monte carlo
engines that can run thousands of simulations and develop a distribution of
forward looking likely scenarios, and can do a risk benefit analys
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...sit around on the beach with your friends in Aruba steaming oysters and
> drinking cold ones by the fire for 24 hours...
Actually this is a pretty good opportunity to illustrate the difference
between the limited Cogn
"Think of a "smart" contesting SDR"
At the contesters forum this year at Dayton they were all zigged up about CW
skimmer. This will really get there undergarments in a perpetual wad.
Just think about it. The control op just need to be in "control" of the radio,
not actually operating it (e.g.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Robert Dennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A thinking SDR should be fascinating...
>
The word "cognitive" is kind of misleading. By convention, a Cognitive Radio
is one which, without operator intervention, will reconfigure itself based
on its current signal e
Geralds Baby Girl?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Ken N9VV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hummm
> GBG = "gotta be good" ?
> GBG = "God Bless Gerald" ?
> GBG = "Greatness Beyond Grandure" ?
> GBG = "Great Big Gadget" ?
> GBG = "Grand Boundless Gates" ?
> GBG = "Golden Brass Goblets" ?
> .
> .
>
Hummm
GBG = "gotta be good" ?
GBG = "God Bless Gerald" ?
GBG = "Greatness Beyond Grandure" ?
GBG = "Great Big Gadget" ?
GBG = "Grand Boundless Gates" ?
GBG = "Golden Brass Goblets" ?
.
.
.
de ken n9vv
> GBG -> initials for a set of words still secret to me, but not hard to
> figure out
_
Hey Frank,
Thanks for the definitions!
Nice to have a few secrets.
A thinking SDR should be fascinating...
Rob
AB7CF
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:56:33 -0700 "Frank Brickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
FSM -> Finite State Machine
C/SDR -> Cognitive/Software Defined Radio
VR -> Virtual Radio
GBG ->
FSM -> Finite State Machine
C/SDR -> Cognitive/Software Defined Radio
VR -> Virtual Radio
GBG -> initials for a set of words still secret to me, but not hard to
figure out
AFAP -> As Far As Possible
*nix -> shorthand for the family of operating systems descended from Unix
73
Frank
AB2KT
PS The pr
*That* is impressive!
John
PS -- I went to the "Round the Horne Revisited" stage show a few years
ago. Another great British radio show.
Alan NV8A said the following on 07/26/2008 10:20 PM:
> Probably I can do you one better: I attended one of their recording
> sessions back in the 1950s.
I use the Flex-5000a PWR SPKR line out to the computer sound card line line in.
Then listen on computer speakers. Can balance with the 5000 mixer output or the
line in.
73's , Bruce
KL7JDR
Bruce W. Mills
P.O. Box 1500
31490 Echo Lake Road
Soldotna , Alaska
99669
(907)262-4373
[EMAIL PR
19 matches
Mail list logo
