Thanks for all that as answered to me.. I have done the hardware reset, like
the advice, but still there is some strange problems
LSB on 160 and 80 (ok) 40 and ( USB ?? ) 20m ( LSB??) etc etc...
another strange thing is the colour of the panadapter panafall that is totally
red?? there is a way
Mike,
Another benefit not yet mentioned by the others is working DX on 40m SSB.
RX2 allows you to listen to the DX station his receive (pile-up) frequency
simultaneously.
I am a single-antenna station use RX2 in this way all the time.
73, Ray, K9DUR
http://k9dur.info
Mike,
When you install the new version, it will be installed in a new directory.
That way, all of your previous settings are saved automatically. You just
have to move them to the new database. To make this easier, I have written
a free utility called SDRDataTransfer. You can download it from
But can't you do this simply with VFO B, without an RX2?
-Original Message-
From: Ray - K9DUR
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 10:04 AM
To: 'Mike Barrett' ; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Benefits of RX2 in a single antenna setup?
Mike,
Another benefit not yet
The new PowerSDR 2.0.19 RC1 seems to be quite good. It is the most
completely-working version I have seen. I can't find anything broken in it
with my limited usage. I have been running it for several days now with no
glitches. My caveats are: I don't run CW and I don't usually run Phone so I
HI
I was just wondering if anyone else using CW decoding software has improved
with .19?
Perhaps it's just my imagination but... it seems to decode better than .16.
Don
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Not outside the VFO-A sampling rate bandwidth and band. That is about 180K for
the F5K running at 192K.
With RX2 you have no band or bandwidth restriction.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Jim
F3K, Toshiba satellite laptop - dual core CPU P8600 - 2.4 Ghz, 4 GB ram, 64 bit
OS Vista.
Installed 2.0.19 RC1 on 2/20/11. Very smooth install recal. No issues and a
nice new skin. Thanks Flex.
73' W1RIL
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
To all concerned,
Thank you very much indeed for the new FlexRadio systems software update,
Though I only have an SDR-1000 still here. It was up and running in minutes.
I find the new display much better with the Black background and very clear
white markings
on all the the control buttons etc,
Mike,
You wrote, But can't you do this simply with VFO B, without an RX2?
On the other bands, yes, but not on 40m. MultiRX allows you to listen to 2
frequencies within the range of the panadapter, a maximum of about 80 kHz at
a sampling rate of 192 kHz a zoom factor of 1x, or about 160 kHz
Brian,
As far as I am aware, the only new default settings that would be lost by
using SDRDataTransfer to transfer settings from an old database are Tim's
spiffy new default filter settings for DIGL DIGU. To avoid losing them, a
user merely needs to use SDRDataTransfer to transfer settings by
A new version of the SDRDataTransfer utility (v4.0.2) is available for
download.
There are no real changes in v4.0.2 over v4.0.1. It is really just a
re-compile of the source code re-build of the setup file.
With v4.0.1, some users were reporting an error message when trying to
transfer
I have been on all day with the Flex, making many contacts for the 50th
Jubilee. This week is the NY week. I don't expect to need any other radio for
the rest of the week's activities.
I am running a nice, garden variety 3.2 gig CPU w/ 3 Gig of RAM in the shack w/
Windows XP. I reduced
Update:
I have been informed that the Flex management has decided to start shipping
all new radios with PowerSDR 2.0.19 RC1, so my previous recommendation for
staying with 1.18.6 until RC2 is released is now reversed. Go ahead and take
the plunge to 2.0.19 RC1 .
-Tim
-Original
I am replying to both lists (yes, I know that is not allowed, but this is
important) since I have had this question asked several times.
They entire behavior of the digital mode RX filters has changed. Other than
changing the filter widths to something more usable for narrow band digital
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Ray - K9DUR k9...@rnacs.com wrote:
Brian,
As far as I am aware, the only new default settings that would be lost by
using SDRDataTransfer to transfer settings from an old database are Tim's
spiffy new default filter settings for DIGL DIGU. To avoid losing
These type of comments,ideas, suggestions emphasize my urging that the
FlexTeam must issue a more thorough PowerSDR user manual that explains stuff
like this. I realize the manual might be +300 pages, but I need to read and
understand like many others do !!
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Tim
There has been a lot of hoopla about CW on the Flex radios. Frankly, they
didn't work very well on CW for many people. This made me very interested in
how the new version would work given how much emphasis has been put on CW
lately.
I have both a Flex 5000a (RX2 and ATU, no VU5K) and a Flex 1500
Ernest,
I can sympathize with you, but the most difficult part of any software
project is the documentation. The only way to get accurate documentation is
for the software to be stable (no changes) the manual writer to have the
time to use the software, learn all of its nuances, write the
Ray, one thing that you folks might consider is a reorganization of the
Knowledge Base. The search function really is pretty weak and the entries
are not cross referenced.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Ray - K9DUR k9...@rnacs.com wrote:
Ernest,
I can sympathize with you, but the most
I am running a Flex 5000A with Audio settings – Buffer 512 – Sample Rate 4800
and PowerSDR 2.0.19.
When using an external keyer and using semi break-in, I find if a dit is sent
at about 25 wpm, it is lengthened. For example, if an ’I'’ ( .. ) is sent,
the Flex will output ‘N’ ( _. ) instead
Patience Ted. This is still beta software and the documentation trails
development.
This is why there are reflector to disseminate information is a timely manner.
-Tim
From: Ted Trostle [mailto:tctros...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 7:25 PM
To: Tim Ellison
Cc: Ernest Garcia;
Try a faster sampling rate
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of jens...@digilink.net
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 8:40 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] CW issue using External Keyer
I did not mean to say beta software, but release candidate. Old habits die
hard.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 9:05 PM
To: Ted Trostle
Cc:
We didn't write the KB software. We do the best we can with what we got.
-Tim
From: William H. Fite [mailto:omni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 8:07 PM
To: Ray - K9DUR
Cc: Ted Trostle; Tim Ellison; Ernest Garcia; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] DIGL/DIGU
Sure. It's just a paddle closure. You would just connect the straight key
to the tip and leave nothing on the ring. Put ground on the sleeve. Same
wiring really, just turn Iambic off on the software.
Eric
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:45 AM, David Hilton-Jones
Buffer 512 and upped Sample to 96000. Same results!
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 6:08 PM
To: jens...@digilink.net ; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] CW issue using External Keyer with 2.0.19 Software
Try a faster sampling
Hi Tim,
I'm confused. Does the notice that the latest beta/RC1 is now shipping
(and being discussed here rather than on the edge) mean that PSDR 2.0 is
now officially released as the current production version?
I took the plunge and installed 2.0.19 while in the middle of the ARRL
DX CW
Bill,
Interesting to hear you are having problems. I used my 5000 this past
weekend in the ARRL DX go round, using a K1EL keyer, and operating between
27 to 35 wpm, and a couple of times up to 40 wpm on some smart guys that
refused to slow down ;o)) Absolutely no problems such as you described,
I installed 2.0.19 RC1 and am using it with my 5000A. On 20m phone, ANF
works very well. It knocks carriers from people tuning up down to
inaudibility.
On 15 meters, however, ANF barely makes a difference. I'd say it only knocks
carriers down by about 20 dB.
Has anyone else seen this? Why should
30 matches
Mail list logo
