I agree Tom and the transfer program makes the experience even better.
Rick Kd4jrx
--
From: "TM"
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 7:32 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] 2.7.2 consensus sought
Dave:
I would definitely go for it. Sounds like the
Dave:
I would definitely go for it. Sounds like the new transfer program is out,
and the first one worked after a bit of trying anyway.
I really like the new features I have tried on v2.7.2. Believe Flex has
done a good job here.
73, Tom
K1FR
-Original Message-
From: FlexRadio [mailto
No Problems here , display certainly looks better
Charlie GI4FUE
-Original Message-
From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of David
Sent: 19 December 2013 22:23
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] 2.7.2 consensus sought
Seems OK to me. I upg
Seems OK to me. I upgraded from v2.6.4. I read the release notes. The only
thing that didn't transfer was the CW messages and the antenna connections
for the different bands. No big deal.
Flex1500, XP .
David
VK3AUU
-Original Message-
From: Dave Gomberg
Sent: Friday, December 20, 201
I used to try to avoid consensus as consensus requires compromise where no
one gets what they want so no one is satisfied. If lit were done MY WAY at
least one of us would be satisfied.
But seriously... I am not an early adopter per se. I prefer to wait till the
smoke settles a bit before jum
I am running 2.5 and considering upgrading. Things are running smoothly now.
Is it the consensus to upgrade now or wait for a maintenance release or ?
--
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco NE5EE Programming since 1961
All addresses, phones, etc. at http://www.wcf.com/ham/info.html
For whatever it's worth, 2.7.2 and the Data Transfer program went into K8DXX
flawlessly. I ran the installation program without a hitch. After reading
the HELP file briefly, did the database transfer, again flawlessly. After a
brief recalibration of the audio chain, I've had several enjoyable QS
I believe it will work; the only thing that would be necessary is to have
both versions of firmware on the PC.
Allen Shuff / W9ON
-Original Message-
From: Ken Akin
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 3:04 PM
To: Bob VanFossen
Cc: Flex Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] compatibility
Bo
Bob -
Wait for official word to be sure, but I would bet that fallback will not
work with differing release. I think that I remember that there is a
firewire as part of the new release. That likely means that fallback has to
be a carefully followed procedure, which will be in the release notes.
7
The RTTY Offset option was installed to 'fix' a situation where the
digital modes cluster spots would be displayed in such a way that a
quick click-Cluster Jump would put your passband correctly for decode.
Also cluster spots would be correctly placed for other to make a one
click jump and be ab
Ahh but there is: It's called DDutil plus the Flex Knob. I use DDutil to set
the three buttons in the Knob set to execxute macros that change my display
from -115 to -135. The three macros are:M31 ZZDQ-115;ZZDN-120;
M32 ZZDQ-125;ZZDN-130;
M33 ZZDQ-115;ZZDN-120; ZZDQ is the CAT comm
This has been bothering me for some time, and with the new release, I think
now is the time to ask the question.
Scenario:
I have F1.5k and F3k, two(2) home computers and a laptop.
(Sometimes help a buddy with his f5k)
All are working well with v2.6.4
All computers are set up to run eith
12 matches
Mail list logo
