I thank everyone for their criticism, positive comments, negative
comments, etc. on the new architecture thread that were aimed in my
direction. I cannot speak for Flex, since I don't work for them or have
a financial interest in Flex, but I have a couple of comments.
I read all of the thre
Hi Bruce
But look at all the improvements we have gotten in that 4 year period!
The software hasn't stood still at all and seems to be going into
only-dreamed-upon territory with the work that Bob and Eric are doing.
Plus the introduction of new radios which you may think does not
directly affect
This has been ongoing for about four years now !!
Maybe Next Year --- ???
Thank God this is just a Hobby
Bruce
On Sun, 10 May 2009 12:03:01 -0400, you wrote:
>Geez, guys... Why is it that any time anybody raises just a little
>negative criticism they get jumped on? Give Barry a break
r software upgrades. I would
not want them to go bankrupt. That would make absolutely no sense.
Happy Mothers Day!!
Edwin Marzan AB2VW
From: rbee...@hotmail.com
To: edwin_mar...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] New architecture SVN Alpha code?
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:49:44 +
E
Geez, guys... Why is it that any time anybody raises just a little
negative criticism they get jumped on? Give Barry a break.
Barry, and all of us, bought a radio an integral part of which is the
software that runs on a host PC. That software is pretty good, but it's
far from perfect. I think w
The question is whether you want something now or something that we
know works. Its kinda like the people who complain when flights are
delayed due to weather: do you really want to fly in a plane that the
pilot doesn't want to fly?
As with all "new architectures" (I am sure its your experi
Bob has put in thousands of hours into the development of this software. In
fact the reason you have such a nice radio to use is in no small part because
it came out of the brain of N4HY. I did not find his response in the least
offensive.
Before one complains one migh ask precisely how m
are out of line.
Edwin Marzan AB2VW
> Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 23:33:13 -0400
> From: bjablon...@att.net
> To: rwmcgw...@gmail.com; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] New architecture SVN Alpha code?
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> It's "both obvious and seems pru
Hi Bob,
It's "both obvious and seems prudent" to me (I've been in the
engineering business for more than 30 years now) that you don't
release alpha code to the general public for the reasons you have
implied. It's also "both obvious and seems prudent" that you
you don't put forth false promise
r it yet. Just low level components are talking to one another.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Barry Jablonski
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 10:43 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] N
other.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Barry Jablonski
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 10:43 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] New architecture SVN Alpha code?
Can anyone point me to where the &q
Can anyone point me to where the "new architecture" alpha code (SVN)
resides? I'd like to start testing it.
Barry
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archi
12 matches
Mail list logo
