From: "Jonathan Polley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just updated to the newest CVS for everything. While linux us now
> compiling and running just fine (thanks Curt), MSVC continues to whine.
>
> First: The #include in viewer.cxx needs to be #include
> "fg_props.hxx"
NO. It needs #include "Main/fg_
Norman Vine wrote:
>
> This profiling run might be enlightening
>
> time seconds secondscalls us/call us/call name
> 4.07 2.45 0.14 657919 0.21 0.21 fgGetBool(char const
> 3.49 2.57 0.12 2352563 0.05 0.05 fgGetDouble(char const
> 3.20
Christian Mayer writes:
>
>Norman Vine wrote:
>>
>> This profiling run might be enlightening
>> >
>IT's very interesting to see that fgGetBool takes a
>significantly longer
>time to run (3x - 10x as long).
>
>Perhaps we can optimze the result by returning a int instead of a bool
>(afaik is int sup
From: "Christian Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Norman Vine wrote:
> >
> > This profiling run might be enlightening
> >
> > time seconds secondscalls us/call us/call name
> > 4.07 2.45 0.14 657919 0.21 0.21 fgGetBool(char
const
> > 3.49 2.57 0.12 2352563
> might change my mind over the next few weeks. Ground school starts in
> late April, so I have some time to decide.
>
David, you owe it to yourself to give it another chance. I've only got
4.4 hours as a student in a C152, so I'm not a pilot (yet).
The C172 is going to give you a completely d
On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 10:47 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> From: "Jonathan Polley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Just updated to the newest CVS for everything. While linux us now
>> compiling and running just fine (thanks Curt), MSVC continues to whine.
>>
>> First: The #include in viewer.cxx
Norman Vine wrote:
>
> Christian Mayer writes:
> >
> >Norman Vine wrote:
> >>
> >> This profiling run might be enlightening
> >> >
> >IT's very interesting to see that fgGetBool takes a
> >significantly longer
> >time to run (3x - 10x as long).
> >
> >Perhaps we can optimze the result by returnin
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Polley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC Yada Yada Yada
>
> On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 10:47 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > From: "Jonathan Polley" <[EMAIL PROT
Hello,
How about a reproductible way to benchmark FlightGear ? Something like
q1test or
q2test in Quake. That is : an automated sequence of flight during, say 30s
to 2mn,
along a predetermined path from KSFO with different views. This could be
presented
has a demo and at the end, a summary on fra
> Give it another chance or four. You'll begin to enjoy it. If you've
got
> vertigo or motion sickness problems, a Drammamine tab probably wouldn't
> hurt before you take off.
I've been really lucky this way. When I was taking lessons some twenty
years ago one thing the instructor did was to pu
> Hello,
>
> How about a reproductible way to benchmark FlightGear ? Something like
> q1test or
> q2test in Quake. That is : an automated sequence of flight during, say 30s
> to 2mn,
> along a predetermined path from KSFO with different views. This could be
> presented
> has a demo and at the end,
Christian Mayer writes:
> THat's nice, but the 'problem' with fgGetBool is still existant (and
> it's getting worse as we are using the property system more and more).
fgGetBool may be taking longer because it's accessing a property
that's not typed as a bool. If you have this in an init file
Norman Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> It seems to be worthwhile trying to get fgRehape() out of the loop
> This is only necessary for determining if the Panel display has been
> toggled or switched so we should be able to get this out of the main
> loop also :-)
>
> Folks might want to upda
Jon wrote:
>When I was taking lessons some twenty
>years ago one thing the instructor did was to put a hood on me so I could
>only see the instruments. What he did next I am not quite sure, but he was
>trying to disorient me. Then he told me to level out and fly to a heading
>at an altitude. I sh
Jim Wilson writes:
> Haven't had a chance to look through the changes, but umm...I'm seeing a
> 25% decrease in framerate after this mornings patches. Sorry.
> (Voodoo3/P3-750mhz/100mhz MB/384mb Ram)
Ouch! Have you upgraded SimGear as well?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMA
Okay, I need a boost ;-0
Downloaded the files. Tried the header files in
several locations, but ./configure would not (could not) find them
Is it /usr/include or ~/SimGear/ or
~/SimGear/simgear/ or /usr/local/include/ or..?
Do you need more than the headers? like libraries,
or are the
> > How do I see the 3D cockpit?
>
> fgfs --aircraft=c172-3d
>
This 3D cockpit is part of the C172's AC file?
Marcio Shimoda
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Wilson writes:
>
> > Haven't had a chance to look through the changes, but umm...I'm seeing a
> > 25% decrease in framerate after this mornings patches. Sorry.
> > (Voodoo3/P3-750mhz/100mhz MB/384mb Ram)
>
> Ouch! Have you upgraded SimGear a
> Gadds. I don't know...even with an almost completely idle cpu occaisonally I
> seem to have these weird performance discrepencies. It isn't heat, so who
> knows. Maybe its something weird about the kernel. Later without changing
> anything it looked much better, aproximately a 10% improvement
> John Wojnaroski wrote:
>
> Okay, I need a boost ;-0
>
> Downloaded the files. Tried the header files in several locations, but
> ./configure would not (could not) find them
> Is it /usr/include or ~/SimGear/ or ~/SimGear/simgear/ or
> /usr/local/include/ or..?
You can install them where e
Alex Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Gadds. I don't know...even with an almost completely idle cpu occaisonally I
> > seem to have these weird performance discrepencies. It isn't heat, so who
> > knows. Maybe its something weird about the kernel. Later without changing
> > anything it look
Hi All !
I've been taught that yours is not to reason why , blah blah, but bear with
me
No offense or harm meant, but I think going up in a C150 on a first-ever
flight is a huge mistake. I fly frequently, in anything from Boeing's to
Harvards/Texans to C150's. A C150 is the aircraft I dislike
22 matches
Mail list logo
