On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 19:24, John Check wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 4:22 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> >
> > You could also imagine that something downstream of this central
> > transmission could fail, again leaving you in an unhealthy state. I
>
> "unhealthy state" you guys crack me up.
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 4:22 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
>
> You could also imagine that something downstream of this central
> transmission could fail, again leaving you in an unhealthy state. I
"unhealthy state" you guys crack me up.
Sounds more like brown trousers time to me ;-)
> agree w
On 10 Dec 2002 15:37:08 -0800
Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:27, Jon S Berndt wrote:
I don't know ... I was thinking the other day: what if the
...
Curt, I apologize for even beginning to suggest that you
were stacking things up ...
Hey! It could happen!
:-
Jon S Berndt writes:
> On 10 Dec 2002 15:18:48 -0800
> Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I don't know ... it sound like you are really starting to
> >stack up the failures.
>
> I don't know ... I was thinking the other day: what if the
> pilot was pouring a can of Coke into a cup on
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:27, Jon S Berndt wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2002 15:18:48 -0800
> Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I don't know ... it sound like you are really starting to
> >stack up the failures.
>
> I don't know ... I was thinking the other day: what if the
> pilot was pouring
On 10 Dec 2002 15:18:48 -0800
Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know ... it sound like you are really starting to
stack up the failures.
I don't know ... I was thinking the other day: what if the
pilot was pouring a can of Coke into a cup on the flight
deck and dropped the can an
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 13:22, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Gene Buckle writes:
> > > I think the big danger is at landing or takeoff. If you lose an
> > > engine or have any sort of mechanical failure on a single side, you
> > > are going to hit hard at some really odd angle. At least with a
> > > hel
Gene Buckle writes:
> Well one of my favorite quotes goes something like this:
>
> "If your wings are moving faster than you are, you're in a Helicopter and
> are therefore unsafe." :)
I suppose the related quote would be something along the lines of "If
your wings are moving slower than you, the
> > Curt, there is a central transmission in the wing that will transfer the
> > drive to the operating engine automatically so that won't happen. If they
> > both fail at once though
>
> You could also imagine that something downstream of this central
> transmission could fail, again leaving
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:22:05 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a helicopter, or perhaps you could say that certain types
of failures at certain times would be less survivable in the BA-609
This (above) might be more true than your first statement.
One thing that comes to my
Gene Buckle writes:
> > I think the big danger is at landing or takeoff. If you lose an
> > engine or have any sort of mechanical failure on a single side, you
> > are going to hit hard at some really odd angle. At least with a
> > helicopter you are probably going to land butt first and might ha
> I think the big danger is at landing or takeoff. If you lose an
> engine or have any sort of mechanical failure on a single side, you
> are going to hit hard at some really odd angle. At least with a
> helicopter you are probably going to land butt first and might have a
> chance to try an auto
> It sounds like avoiding the "vortex ring state" is doable but will
> likely require a fair amount of training (and possibly some control law
> mods)
>
Speaking of which - a recent issue of Aviation Leak that I have mentions
that they've been unable to properly account for/simulate the VRS in the
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:09:03 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the big danger is at landing or takeoff. If you lose an
engine or have any sort of mechanical failure on a single side, you
are going to hit hard at some really odd angle. At least with a
helicopter you are
Tony Peden writes:
>
> --- Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmmmthat should thin the ranks down on Wall St even more. It's
> > hard to
> > imagine they are selling civilian versions while there's talk about
> > nixing the
> > Osprey because of safety concerns. Well maybe not that
--- Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmmthat should thin the ranks down on Wall St even more. It's
> hard to
> imagine they are selling civilian versions while there's talk about
> nixing the
> Osprey because of safety concerns. Well maybe not that hard. IMHO
> that thing
> even "
Jim Wilson wrote:
Hmmmthat should thin the ranks down on Wall St even more. It's hard to
imagine they are selling civilian versions while there's talk about nixing the
Osprey because of safety concerns. Well maybe not that hard. IMHO that thing
even "looks" dangerous :-)
It looks like a
Hmmmthat should thin the ranks down on Wall St even more. It's hard to
imagine they are selling civilian versions while there's talk about nixing the
Osprey because of safety concerns. Well maybe not that hard. IMHO that thing
even "looks" dangerous :-)
Best,
Jim
Jon S Berndt <[EMAIL P
Bell/Agusta V-22 derivative commercial BA609:
http://www.bellagusta.com/html/aeroNet/downLoads/20393_609_AB_Brochure.pdf
Fascinating. Pretty pictures, too.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/list
Jim Wilson writes:
> Right...temporary. This just points up the need to get a fully
> configurable autopilot running. If there isn't a DG you can't
> really follow heading. So the j3-cub should not even have an
> autopilot without it.
I wonder if anyone has ever STC'd some kind of autopilot
Norman Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Wilson wrrites:
> >
> > It isn't a YASim problem, other than those are the aircraft that don't have DG
> > installed.
>
> Here is a temporary *patch*
>
> This also reactivates the autopilot adjuster :-)
>
Right...temporary. This just points up the
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:56:19AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
> Adam wrote:
>
> > Is there an easy way to fix this then? I didn't turn on the
> > clouds3d stuff at all - so it in my download it must be on by
> > default - I will try with it turned off.
>
> > Sorry for being a bit of a newb here,
Jim Wilson wrrites:
>
> It isn't a YASim problem, other than those are the aircraft that don't have DG
> installed.
Here is a temporary *patch*
This also reactivates the autopilot adjuster :-)
Norman
diffs
Description: Binary data
Adam wrote:
> Is there an easy way to fix this then? I didn't turn on the
> clouds3d stuff at all - so it in my download it must be on by
> default - I will try with it turned off.
> Sorry for being a bit of a newb here, but can you offer more
> advice about how to implement Norman's new code?
24 matches
Mail list logo
