Re: [Flightgear-devel] Remote root exploit found in CVS

2003-01-21 Thread Bert Driehuis
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Jim Wilson wrote: > Root? I doubt it. Although, I suppose it _will_ run under root just like > anything else ;-) Experience in this field tells me that a nobody compromise usually is as bad as a root compromise :-) Cheers, -- Bert -- Bert Driehui

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Remote root exploit found in CVS

2003-01-21 Thread Jim Wilson
Bernie Bright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Slashdot reports that CVS versions 1.11.4 and lower can grant root access to > malicious remote users. They advise anyone running a cvs server to upgrade to > 1.11.5 ASAP. You have been warned. > Root? I doubt it. Although, I suppose it _will_ run un

[Flightgear-devel] Remote root exploit found in CVS

2003-01-21 Thread Bernie Bright
Slashdot reports that CVS versions 1.11.4 and lower can grant root access to malicious remote users. They advise anyone running a cvs server to upgrade to 1.11.5 ASAP. You have been warned. Bernie http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/03/01/21/1752251.shtml?tid=128

re: [Flightgear-devel] ssgInit() failure

2003-01-21 Thread David Megginson
Gopal Mor writes: > What was need to be done was to install latest CVS version of the > plib and not the PLIB 1.6.0 version. With this I could build the > FG. Thanks. That's probably a good idea, but it's not necessary any more with the latest FlightGear CVS. > Mesa GLX Indirect > Max textu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ssgInit() failure

2003-01-21 Thread Bert Driehuis
Gopal Mor wrote: Processing command line argumentsFinished command line argumentsOpening a window: 800x600Mesa GLX IndirectMax texture size = 2048Depth buffer bits = 16FATAL: ssgInit called without a valid OpenGL context. I have MESA Lib 3.4.X installed on my machine. Any idea why about invalis Op

[Flightgear-devel] ssgInit() failure

2003-01-21 Thread Gopal Mor
From: David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 12:15:54 -0500To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: re: [Flightgear-devel] plib/psl.hReply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Gopal Mor writes:> I have recently downloaded FlightGear and trying to build it over> Red Hat Linux. I have downloaded plib-1.6.0.

[Flightgear-devel] ssgInit() failure

2003-01-21 Thread Gopal Mor
From: David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 12:15:54 -0500To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: re: [Flightgear-devel] plib/psl.hReply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Gopal Mor writes:> I have recently downloaded FlightGear and trying to build it over> Red Hat Linux. I have downloaded plib-1.6.0.

[Flightgear-devel] ssgInit() failure

2003-01-21 Thread Gopal Mor
From: David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 12:15:54 -0500To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: re: [Flightgear-devel] plib/psl.hReply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Gopal Mor writes:> I have recently downloaded FlightGear and trying to build it over> Red Hat Linux. I have downloaded plib-1.6.0.

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Class name clash and namespaces

2003-01-21 Thread Jon Berndt
> That sounds like a very good idea, especially since JSBSim tends to > use the FG* prefix in its classes, just like FlightGear does. Why > don't we update JSBSim in FlightGear as soon as the whole thing is > moved into the jsbsim Namespace and tested. I got Bernie's code (Thanks Bernie). What is

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Class name clash and namespaces

2003-01-21 Thread David Megginson
Jon Berndt writes: > Ah, yes. I need to go in and change that. Thanks. I'll probably recommend > that this current version of JSBSim (0.9.4) gets moved into FlightGear CVS > very soon. > > Question: Did you add namespace usage to ALL JSBSim files? I tried it with > just FGCondition (to mini

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Class name clash and namespaces

2003-01-21 Thread Jon Berndt
> Just added "namespace jsbsim { ... }" to latest CVS JSBSim and got a clean > compile and link. I'm not in a position to test at the moment. BTW > FGConditon was missing from filtersjb/Makefile.am. Ah, yes. I need to go in and change that. Thanks. I'll probably recommend that this current versi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Class name clash and namespaces

2003-01-21 Thread Bernie Bright
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:14:54 -0600 "Jon S Berndt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:07:57 +1100 > Bernie Bright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:37:54 -0600 > >"Jon Berndt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I remember having this conversation before. If you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] IVAO support?

2003-01-21 Thread Major A
> I've already discussed this on the list a few days back. Simclients (used by > IVAO and VATSIM) are proprietary, so I'm going to have to reverse engineer it > (the fact that It could be a IPX protocol is even worse, as I wasn't able to > connect on a Win98 box without IPX, but I did on a WinM

Re: [Flightgear-devel] IVAO support?

2003-01-21 Thread Mathew McBride
I've already discussed this on the list a few days back. Simclients (used by IVAO and VATSIM) are proprietary, so I'm going to have to reverse engineer it (the fact that It could be a IPX protocol is even worse, as I wasn't able to connect on a Win98 box without IPX, but I did on a WinME box wit