Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-06 Thread David Megginson
Matthew Johnson writes (quoting an online review): Overall the system structure and coding is poor - and reflects the checkered and disrupted development history That is true, unfortunately. FlightGear's code is better organized than many open source projects (and far better than nearly all

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On 05 Jan 2003 23:07:47 -0800, Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..I'll ask and cc here, look for http://www.dlsproductions.com/fg/; in the Subject: header. You're all taking this rather well, as far as I can tell... ..I've received a response

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-05 Thread Erik Hofman
Hi, Some one must have had a great time: http://www.dlsproductions.com/fg/ Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-05 Thread Christian Mayer
Erik Hofman wrote: Hi, Some one must have had a great time: http://www.dlsproductions.com/fg/ A very interesting page! I think we should look closely on their conclusion in their reflection: In conclusion, the FlightGear flight simulator is a very nice flight sim package that offers

RE: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-05 Thread Jon Berndt
I think we should look closely on their conclusion in their reflection: In conclusion, the FlightGear flight simulator is a very nice flight sim package that offers great features (for free), but very poor extensibility with very few user-friendly tools and source code that is geared

RE: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-05 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jon Berndt writes: I think we should look closely on their conclusion in their reflection: In conclusion, the FlightGear flight simulator is a very nice flight sim package that offers great features (for free), but very poor extensibility with very few user-friendly tools and

RE: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-05 Thread Jon Berndt
Curt wrote: Right, I don't want to be too critical ... they are certainly entitled to form an opinion based on their experiences. They also may be giving us poor marks in the area of cross-platform portability for not doing everything natively on every platform ... there again, that may be

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-05 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:18:26 -0600, Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: They say some nice things in there too, and we need to stand up and take our criticism like adults, they clearly spent quite a bit of time investigating FlightGear ... ..I'll ask and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Modification Project

2003-01-05 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 21:02, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:18:26 -0600, Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: They say some nice things in there too, and we need to stand up and take our criticism like adults, they clearly spent quite a bit