Erik Hofman wrote:
Yes. Maintaining can be done using CVS and when the official release is
out it can be just a matter of letting a script generate the tarballs
for the static scenery.
It may be something which would benefit from a more regular snapshot
though - so that new scenery is available
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 10:32:31 +0200
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've already explained this to Jon, but I was really aiming at a two
> stage approach. Maintaining can be done using CVS. Making it available
> for users could be done like downloading the terrain data right now:
> Us
Chris Metzler wrote:
Fair enough. But with ground structures that are installable separately,
it's possible for a user to pick and choose what to install. For example,
someone could wish to see a set of landmarks in Paris, but not the
buildings at Orly (wanting smoother framerates during landing/
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That
would be easiest for everybody (
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:17:48 +0200
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that (now that we have a separate Objects directory) it is
possible quite easily to add a command-line option to disable the static
scenery objects.
Fair enough. But with ground structures that
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:17:48 +0200
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris Metzler wrote:
>> I've been waiting to post this until after the release went out,
>> hoping there'd be more discussion when things were a tiny bit calmer .
>> . .
>>
>> Over time, various people have done a lot of wo
Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That makes
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That makes
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place, preferably
(but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at flightgear.org just
like the world wide scenery right now. That would be easiest for
everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That makes life very easy for u
Chris Metzler wrote:
> Mat Churchill and I are both enthusiastic about such a scenery
> website.
>
> What do people think?
I think some sort of centralised list of what people have been working
on is a great way to go - for both finished scenery, and models too -
obviously there are limits to what
Chris Metzler wrote:
[...]
So what we discussed was a webpage/site which would (eventually) do for
FlightGear what avsim.com/flightsim.com's file libraries do for MSFS.
At least at first, it'd provide upload/browse/download capability.
Even though I agree with Erik that it would make sense to keep
Chris Metzler wrote:
I've been waiting to post this until after the release went out, hoping
there'd be more discussion when things were a tiny bit calmer . . .
Over time, various people have done a lot of work on ground structures,
etc., to add to the scenery for FlightGear. Frederic's did a lot
13 matches
Mail list logo