> Thanks for the file. It fixed the seg fault.
> But C172R seems to suffer the same lower-than-RL max RPM as C172P (2200
> vs 2400), and as such cannot climb at the expected rate.
> Do they share some engine spec file that may have been modifed recently?
> Yavuz Onder
I don't think so. I've got
Ron Jensen wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 17:23 -0400, Yavuz Onder wrote:
Hi,
Failing to get the performance I need from C172P, I decided to try
C172R, it seg faulted with this output:
~/ob/FlightGear-0.9/source$ fly --aircraft=c172r --airport=LSTS
--runway=14
Model Author: Unk
Fred
> This is what I am getting with CVS today ( --aircraft=a4f ) :
>
> Failed to load submodel: Failed to open file
> at i:/FlightGear/cvs/fgfsbase/Aircraft/a4/Models/strop.xml
> Failed to load aircraft from Aircraft/a4/Models/a4f-blue.xml
> (Falling back to glider.ac.)
>
/FlightGear/cvs/f
Fred
>
> This is what I am getting with CVS today ( --aircraft=a4f ) :
>
> Failed to load submodel: Failed to open file
> at i:/FlightGear/cvs/fgfsbase/Aircraft/a4/Models/strop.xml
> Failed to load aircraft from Aircraft/a4/Models/a4f-blue.xml
> (Falling back to glider.ac.)
>
I haven't change
> It's possible to disable the UIUC and other esoteric FDMs entirely at
> the configure stage, IIRC.
I looked at FG's configure briefly and I do not see how.
Anyway, here's a patch attempting to "new" AIRCRAFT only when it's needed.
A brief test using the ornithopter versus the defau
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 17:23 -0400, Yavuz Onder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Failing to get the performance I need from C172P, I decided to try
> C172R, it seg faulted with this output:
>
> ~/ob/FlightGear-0.9/source$ fly --aircraft=c172r --airport=LSTS
> --runway=14
> Model Author: Unknown
>
Hi,
I am running CVS, I have updated today (Apr 8 ~ 16:30 EDT). Gentoo
Linux, with a Radeon 7500 64 Meg video card.
I have been trying to fly off LSTS runway 14.
This place is deep in a valley surrounded by gorgeous mountains.
I needed to gain altitude a.s.a.p. So, I set 10 degree flaps, re
Hi,
This is what I am getting with CVS today ( --aircraft=a4f ) :
Failed to load submodel: Failed to open file
at i:/FlightGear/cvs/fgfsbase/Aircraft/a4/Models/strop.xml
Failed to load aircraft from Aircraft/a4/Models/a4f-blue.xml
(Falling back to glider.ac.)
-Fred
--
Frédéric Bouvier
http://
Robicd wrote:
> * Completely revised airport data file (apt.dat) that will allow
> many new features, such as smoothly-curved taxiways, polygonal aprons,
> airport boundary fences, enhanced taxiway markings (centre lines and
> lights, edge lines), taxiway signs, and many other goodies."
A
> I probably don't know enough about UIUC's or in fact any FDMs'
> internals and so I can't say whether this is a lot of memory for a FDM
> or not. But having 117mb of memory allocated (or committed) at startup
> (this is even before main(), btw), regardless of what aircraft/FDM is
> being used
On 08/04/06, Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The right way to do it, IMHO, is with the turbulence input, as
> > that's what the stall buffet is, after all: turbulence over
> > the wings due to flow separation. Modify the number based on
> > the current AoA, probably with a little Nasal
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> Also there isn't 100% agreement on what is a 'lake' and what is
> 'ocean'. So if you use GSHHS for land/ocean and vmap0 for lakes and
> rivers, you lose things like lake washington in seattle because GSHSS
> thinks it's a lake, vmap0 thinks it's part of the ocean, so
On Friday 07 April 2006 07:56, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Lee Elliott -- Friday 07 April 2006 00:31:
> > now all we need from everyone else is a decision on
> > 'agl-hold' vs. 'terrain-follow'.
>
> Okay. I flipped a coin, and agl-hold won! :-P
>
> No, seriously: If nobody objects I will tomorrow sw
On Friday 07 April 2006 00:19, Andy Ross wrote:
> [redirecting to flightgear-devel]
>
> Lee Elliott wrote:
> > However, I think this could faked very convincingly already
> > in YASim and probably in JSBSim too, simply by playing with
> > mass distribution depending on conditions (anyone want to
>
* Robicd -- Saturday 08 April 2006 15:33:
> "Enhancements to the X-Plane airport and nav-aid data [...]
> taxiway signs, and many other goodies."
That's good news. FYI: I'm in the progress of improving the signs,
and half finished even. I have lighted signs with proportional fonts.
(Not just a sq
Martin Spott wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
FG's scenery (0.9.10) is generated using the landmass, and as you
can see from the above link, there are rather big differences between
the landmass and the coastline/swbd, especially with the main island
(the one that looks like a frog).
This is
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 09:15:20 -0400
Josh Babcock wrote:
>
> http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/flightgear/ch53e/progress/progress.html
>
> This poor, unsupported young aircraft model, like many in the third
> world, has a grim future. It faces poverty, disease, and lack of any
> good FlightGear rota
Chris Metzler wrote:
My main holdup in making them available (other than the missing
characteristics named above) has been my being unsure of the best, uh,
"deployment method."
...
Automated generation would be fine, except for the fact that fgfs
doesn't know about taxiway designations
Hi C
Pigeon wrote:
> FG's scenery (0.9.10) is generated using the landmass, and as you
> can see from the above link, there are rather big differences between
> the landmass and the coastline/swbd, especially with the main island
> (the one that looks like a frog).
This is a major difficulty that
http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/flightgear/ch53e/progress/progress.html
This poor, unsupported young aircraft model, like many in the third
world, has a grim future. It faces poverty, disease, and lack of any
good FlightGear rotary wing FDM.
But it doesn't have to be that way. For an annual don
Pigeon wrote :
> Very nice indeed!
>
> Allow me to ask a maybe more terragear related question here.
>
>
> http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/cgi-bin/mapserv40?mode=browse&layer=landmass_default&layer=gshhs_coastline&layer=swbd&zoomdir=0&zoomsize=2&imgxy=300.0+300.0&imgext=113.841666+
Very nice indeed!
Allow me to ask a maybe more terragear related question here.
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/cgi-bin/mapserv40?mode=browse&layer=landmass_default&layer=gshhs_coastline&layer=swbd&zoomdir=0&zoomsize=2&imgxy=300.0+300.0&imgext=113.841666+22.030833+114.341666+22.
In the progress of testing the FG live cd (under qemu), I discovered
a rather interesting behavior of the UIUC FDM.
(My) qemu by default ram size to be 128mb. When I was trying to run
fgfs, it gave me an exception of std::bad_alloc and then terminated.
After having some hints from Melchio
"This still is not heaven; but it is outside hell" :-)
In my desperate attempt to throw some usability at my mapserver I made
my first attempts writing some lines of PHP:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
You're invited to make use of this mapserver if you're uncertain about
the landcover data
Hi,
Ralf Gerlich schrieb:
In the custom scenery I can only fly with 800x600 or with random objects
deactivated at 1280x1024. In the latter case I get around 12-18fps, in
the former case it drops down to 6fps at times.
I noticed that the customised scenery tends to produce not only more -
whi
25 matches
Mail list logo
