Hi Durk,
Durk Talsma wrote:
> -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -MT visual_enviro.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/visual_enviro.Tpo"
> -c -o visual_enviro.o visual_enviro.cxx; \
> then mv -f ".deps/visual_enviro.Tpo" ".deps/visual_enviro.Po"; else rm -f
> ".deps/visual_enviro.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> In file included from ..
Selon Jason Cox :
> Hi all,
> i have just done an update via cvs today and have the following
> problem,
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/DATA/src/Flightgear/Flightgear/src/ATC'
> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/incl
Selon Mathias Froehlich :
> Update of /var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/SimGear/simgear/math
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv15898/simgear/math
>
> Modified Files:
> SGQuat.hxx
> Log Message:
> Modified Files:
> simgear/scene/util/SGDebugDrawCallback.hxx
> simgear/math/SGQuat.hxx: Olaf Fleb
Hi all,
i have just done an update via cvs today and have the following
problem,
make[2]: Entering directory `/DATA/src/Flightgear/Flightgear/src/ATC'
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -MT
a
Hey list,
I just tried upgrading to Open Scene Graph, and got the following error while
trying to compile SimGear:
f g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../simgear -I../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include
-g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -MT visual_enviro.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/visual_enviro.Tpo"
-c -o visual_enviro.o vi
Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> I think it is better to collect all the problems and workarounds on a
> specific wiki page.
>
> I found out that there is alread a existing one, so I enhanced the
> OpenSceneGraph topic
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=OpenSceneGraph
>From some
On Monday 06 November 2006 23:52, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> I think too that we have to support the plib branch quite a while. The
> idea to do the OSG switch in CVS head was that the OSG developers do not
> have the efforts for porting features from branch back to HEAD. So
> please work in the pre-OSG
On Monday 06 November 2006 13:17, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> > Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and a
> > _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have
> > won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new one
On Monday 06 November 2006 11:23, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> I hope the total freedom of using features given by OSG will encourage us
> to think about more clever ways to do things, that could be beneficial in
> the end. For instance, using multitexturing instead of cutting tiny
> triangle in the s
On Sunday 05 November 2006 23:43, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> Uncommenting sceneView->update() in render.cxx gives a performance jump
>
> >from 60FPS to 80FPS. (plib was 100FPS). Traversing the scenegraph seems
>
> to be quite timing relevant. Can we limit this special update-traversal
> only to the aircr
Hi,
On Monday 06 November 2006 09:45, Holger Wirtz wrote:
> How about this for the FlighGear community? If this is acceptable I
> would suggest that I try to contact VATSIM and will hear what they mean
> about this.
>From my point of view: yes.
Greetings
Mathias
Hi Tim,
On Monday 06 November 2006 10:59, Tim Moore wrote:
> I was seeing the problem of falling through the earth in w070n40.
> With this patch I can run successfully starting with --airport=kpqi.
That is applied.
That area needs to be overhauled anyway, but until than this problem is fixed!
Tha
This is legendary Russian aircraft. First flight was 1947.
This is port of MSFS model by Anton Nikolaev aka Xomer. Published under GPL
with his permission.
Model have 8 livreas, original sound, full animated visual and complicate 2d
panel. There is real flight manual, but only in Russian, sor
On Monday 06 November 2006 23:46, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> I think it is better to collect all the problems and workarounds on a
> specific wiki page.
>
> I found out that there is alread a existing one, so I enhanced the
> OpenSceneGraph topic
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?tit
Hi,
Sorry for the late answer. I was out for the weekend ...
On Thursday 02 November 2006 07:29, syd wrote:
> This is just a question to satisfy my curiosity , but what was the
> reason for choosing OpenSceneGraph over OpenSG ?
> The answer probably is obvious , just not to me ...
I believe that
alexis bory a écrit :
> Olaf Flebbe wrote :
> > I found out that there is alread a existing one, so I enhanced the
> > OpenSceneGraph topic
> > http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=OpenSceneGraph
> >
>
> I'm currently setting up a list of working/segfaulting aircrafts
> (a
Hi,
Quote Olaf Flebbe:
"
I think too that we have to support the plib branch
quite a while. The
idea to do the OSG switch in CVS head was that the OSG
developers do
not
have the efforts for porting features from branch back
to HEAD. So
please work in the pre-OSG branch until the
performance i
Olaf Flebbe wrote :
> I found out that there is alread a existing one, so I enhanced the
> OpenSceneGraph topic
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=OpenSceneGraph
I'm currently setting up a list of working/segfaulting aircrafts (ac3d
files problems), but I test only o
thanks!
On 11/6/06, Olaf Flebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Douglas Campos schrieb:
> > Some of you (Olaf?) knows what is the acceptance status of ac3d loader
> > patch from upstream mantainers?
>
> Mathias told me that he has not posted it to the OpenSceneGraph people.
> He is working to get it
Hi,
I think too that we have to support the plib branch quite a while. The
idea to do the OSG switch in CVS head was that the OSG developers do not
have the efforts for porting features from branch back to HEAD. So
please work in the pre-OSG branch until the performance issue is solved.
But pl
Hi,
I think it is better to collect all the problems and workarounds on a
specific wiki page.
I found out that there is alread a existing one, so I enhanced the
OpenSceneGraph topic
http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=OpenSceneGraph
with known problems collected out of
Douglas Campos schrieb:
> Some of you (Olaf?) knows what is the acceptance status of ac3d loader
> patch from upstream mantainers?
Mathias told me that he has not posted it to the OpenSceneGraph people.
He is working to get it upstream before the 1.3 OSG release.
Olaf
--
> Now I m stuck in the linking progress of FlightGear, there are some
> unresolved symbols and I dont know how to fix them:
> FlightgearLib.lib(auto_gui.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
> symbol "public: void __thiscall
> puObject::setColourScheme(float,float,float,float)"
This symbol s
Hi,
> I hope the total freedom of using features given by OSG will encourage us to
> think about more clever ways to do things, that could be beneficial in the
> end.
Thanks Frederic. I too think, there are many things which can be
improved considarably and which will lead to higher performance
Durk Talsma wrote:
> Okay, I promised some pictures now that my linux box is online again:
>
> http://durktalsma.xs4all.nl/FlightGear/fsweekend/web/
You know: The magic behind a smooth landing is a carefully prepared
approach - this counts for the Eiffel Tower as well ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS
Fred wrote:
> Selon Vivian Meazza :
>
> > Yes, I saw you had fixed that, but that's the only one with that
> particular
> > problem. Since it worked under plib, and AC3D didn't complain, I would
> never
> > have worked that one out - thank you. If only the rest were that easy -
> the
> > others s
Hi,
I have on win (msvc express, with Olafs easy to use project files) on a
P4M 2,2Ghz 1GB GeForce FX Go 5600 about half the frame rate with osg
than with plib. The frame rate is so low (~10fps), that fg is not
flyable (and without the plib branch it would be not possible, to
check/improve FDMs
Hi Darko,
Darko Tasovac schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I've started to add airport facilities on some airports. I've finished
> almost everything but the airport name
> (http://www.airport-belgrade.co.yu/upload/images/galerije/eksterijer/velike/t2zgrukoso.JPG,
> http://www.airport-belgrade.co.yu/upload/ima
Yes, they are very old (probably much older than 15 years?), but they
are still very impressive (maybe the most impressive heli videos I saw).
Maik
Martin Spott schrieb:
> Oh man, this is one of the _really_ old MBB demo movies with the
> 'hot-and-high'-equipped BO105. I've seen that movie before,
On 11/6/06, alexis bory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,How to contact the server maintener? The wiki was very slow the lastdays and now it's not usable anymore.AlexisAlexis,
I've noticed the same problem and I'm contacting my web hosting company regarding the slowness.
It is a shared hosting serv
On Monday 06 November 2006 11:29, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Curtis Olson" wrote:
> > Good job Durk and Robin, thanks for the report and for all your work!
>
> Seconded,
> Martin.
> P.S.: ;-))
Thanks (BIG :-))! Hope you had a good trip home.
Okay, I promised some pictures now that my linux bo
Some of you (Olaf?) knows what is the acceptance status of ac3d loader
patch from upstream mantainers?
thanx
Douglas Campos
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly
Selon Darko Tasovac :
> Hi all,
>
> I've started to add airport facilities on some airports. I've finished
> almost everything but the airport name
>
(http://www.airport-belgrade.co.yu/upload/images/galerije/eksterijer/velike/t2zgrukoso.JPG,
>
http://www.airport-belgrade.co.yu/upload/images/galeri
Selon "Leidson Campos A. Ferreira" :
> >
> > If you write about fgrun, go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/fgrun
> >
> >
> Yes, That right !
>
> You'll be able to get the latest development sources via SVN or download the
> > released tarball.
> >
>
> I've downloaded the released tarball and now
Selon Vivian Meazza :
> Yes, I saw you had fixed that, but that's the only one with that particular
> problem. Since it worked under plib, and AC3D didn't complain, I would never
> have worked that one out - thank you. If only the rest were that easy - the
> others seem to be keyboard/panel contro
hi,
How to contact the server maintener? The wiki was very slow the last
days and now it's not usable anymore.
Alexis
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with p
Hi,
Magus schrieb:
> Hello All,
> ...
> I would like to know:
>
> a) What's the preferred Windows CVS tool?
>
>
Don't know. I am using cygwin cvs, but there is wincvs, which could be
easier to use/install.
> b) How do I find and access your CVS repository?
>
>
It's summarized on severa
On Monday 06 November 2006 20:10, Darko Tasovac wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a questions about traffic patterns rules...
>
> Are folder names in the data/Traffic folder airliner's ICAO or should
> be named with full airliner name?
>
>
Currently there is no official "rule", but for consistency I wo
I dont know. Do you have an example xml?
Where do you put this " "?
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:53:41 +0100, Darko wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've started to add airport facilities on some airports. I've finished
>> almost everything but th
Hi all,
I have a questions about traffic patterns rules...
Are folder names in the data/Traffic folder airliner's ICAO or should
be named with full airliner name?
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web ser
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:53:41 +0100, Darko wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I've started to add airport facilities on some airports. I've finished
> almost everything but the airport name
> (http://www.airport-belgrade.co.yu/upload/images/galerije/eksterijer/
> velike/t2zgrukos
Hi,
Is it possible to specify the assignment of a property from another
property in XML files?
The property-assign command would do the thing but requires a user input.
In fact I would like to know whether I can specify a property synonym by
XML.
My need comes from the fact I am trying to make
Hi Holger,Yes, I think a separate black box gateway application to vatsim would be a very plausible way to move forward. You could keep all the NDA/Proprietary stuff in it's own sandbox and separate from FlightGear. That way you don't have to worry about incompatible license issues. Your black b
Hi all,
I've started to add airport facilities on some airports. I've finished
almost everything but the airport name
(http://www.airport-belgrade.co.yu/upload/images/galerije/eksterijer/velike/t2zgrukoso.JPG,
http://www.airport-belgrade.co.yu/upload/images/galerije/eksterijer/velike/Aerodrom%20Be
If you write about fgrun, go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/fgrun
Yes, That right !You'll be able to get the latest development sources via SVN or download the released tarball.
I've downloaded the released tarball and now I'm trying to compile it, but GCC compiler generate 3 unresolved linker
"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> Yes, I saw you had fixed that, but that's the only one with that particular
> problem. Since it worked under plib, and AC3D didn't complain, [...]
In his 'announcement' Mathias has been mentioning that the AC3D-loader
still requires some further finishing. I wouldn't worr
Frederic Bouvier
> Quoting Vivian Meazza :
>
> > Martin Spott
> >
> > > "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features,
> and
> > > a
> > > > _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to
> have
> > > > won't further r
I'm now posting this in another thread because the "FlightGear
Starting time" thread doesnt seem to be the right location for my
problem now.
I compiled FG 0.9.10 release version with MSVC 2005 Express and was
facing some weired problem causing FG to crash every time I tried to
start it. As I figu
Quoting Vivian Meazza :
> Martin Spott
>
> > "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> >
> > > Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and
> > a
> > > _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have
> > > won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new
Quoting "Leidson Campos A. Ferreira" :
> I need the latest FlightGear launcher source code.
>
> Anyone knows where to get it ?
If you write about fgrun, go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/fgrun
You'll be able to get the latest development sources via SVN or download the
released tarball.
-Fre
I need the latest FlightGear launcher source code.Anyone knows where to get it ?Thanks,LeidsonPlanetaMessenger.org
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-inte
Tim Moore wrote
> I was seeing the problem of falling through the earth in w070n40.
> With this patch I can run successfully starting with --airport=kpqi.
>
This patch seems to fix that bug, and without any side-effects that I can
see. No doubt Mathias will comment in due course.
Vivian
-
Martin Spott
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
>
> > Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and
> a
> > _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have
> > won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new ones.
>
> Hey, guys, you're talking a
Holger Wirtz wrote:
> All I want wo avoid is to write code for something that will never be
> used because there are plans for connecting to other well known
> available services - if they are open source or not.
Please let us slow down this topic for a few days as "the FlightGear
people at FSWee
"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and a
> _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have
> won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new ones.
Hey, guys, you're talking about a _development_ source co
Didier,
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Didier Fabert wrote:
> Le lundi 6 novembre 2006 11:43, Holger Wirtz a écrit :
> > Ok, I see the problem. But I think it will be difficult to get a big
> > community for atc flying and it will be more difficult to build the "same"
> > atc applicatio
Hi Alexis,
alexis bory wrote:
> CVS version will segfault with many aicraft due to the switch to OSG,
> but it works fine with OSG compatible aircrafts.
Would you mind creating a short list of aircraft that you know to be
'compatible' ?
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it'
Maik Justus wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKPREi3TGXw&mode=related&search=
Oh man, this is one of the _really_ old MBB demo movies with the
'hot-and-high'-equipped BO105. I've seen that movie before, it must be
at least 15 years old
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user frie
Le lundi 6 novembre 2006 11:43, Holger Wirtz a écrit :
> Ok, I see the problem. But I think it will be difficult to get a big
> community for atc flying and it will be more difficult to build the "same"
> atc applications for a new protocol. Maybe a new protocol will be better
> and really open - b
syd wrote:
> Now THAT had to be embarrasing! Actually while researching floats
> with retractable wheels for the DHC-2 , [...]
Mmmmh, this definitely is an aircraft that I'd love to fly during my
'career' as private pilot - this aircraft just has 'charisma' !
Ok, I'd try to avoid the nose-dive ..
> Hi John,
>
> "Jon S. Berndt" wrote:
>
>> It might be a good idea to have printed a few copies of some of the
>> technical reports that have been presented for FlightGear and related or
>> constituent parts. For instance, I presented a paper on JSBSim in 2004 at
>> the AIAA Modeling and Simulati
George,
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:57:41PM +1030, George Patterson wrote:
[...]
> > > But there has been some talk about stand-alone bridging software AFAIK.
> >
> > The background of my question was the following:
> > If there are ideas to implement VATSIM I need not to go on to implenent
> > so
Hi John,
"Jon S. Berndt" wrote:
> It might be a good idea to have printed a few copies of some of the
> technical reports that have been presented for FlightGear and related or
> constituent parts. For instance, I presented a paper on JSBSim in 2004 at
> the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Conferenc
"Curtis Olson" wrote:
> Good job Durk and Robin, thanks for the report and for all your work!
Seconded,
Martin.
P.S.: ;-))
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
--
Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> > I am not able to install plib on a solaris 9 sun machine. I run the
> > ./configure and no errors are shown. When i do "make" i get this error:
> > Error code 1
> > make:fatal error:command failed to target 'pu.o'
> This is a FlightGear list, not a plib list ;-)
and
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 19:47 +0100, Holger Wirtz wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:36:34PM +0100, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Holger Wirtz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > does anyone know if there are considerations to add VATSIm
Quoting Vivian Meazza :
> Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and a
> _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have
> won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new ones.
>
>
>
> We're in danger of limiting the use of FG to high
Quoting Thomas Biwer :
> Indeed, the problem seems to be in some plib code, since he points me
> towards the file ssgloadac.cxx , line 898 which says: "loader_fd =
> fopen ( filename, "ra" ) ;"
You need a newer plib ( svn or the proposed pre-1.8.5 tarball ). This line is
faulty and need to be cha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was seeing the problem of falling through the earth in w070n40.
With this patch I can run successfully starting with --airport=kpqi.
Tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigma
Hi,
Vivian Meazza wrote:
>> Ralf Gerlich wrote:
>>> - transparency issues:
> The reflector gun sight on the Seahawk does the same. So I would assume that
> it's a transparency ordering bug.
I just remembered that I had a similar issue with transparency in the
plib-only version. I'm currently work
Hello *,
I am new to the FlightGear developer list and so I know not very much
about former discusions about FlightGear and VATSIM.
I try to build a realtime radio for FlightGear based on VoIP (I have already
an alpha release - I just have to test this software behind NAT). The
next step would b
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Let’s hope that you’re correct. Right now we have _/fewer/_ features,
> and a _/lower/_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used
> to have won’t further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new ones.
One area which will give quite a performance boost wil
Let’s hope that you’re correct. Right now we
have _fewer_ features, and a _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back
the features we used to have won’t further reduce the frame rate, let
alone adding new ones.
We’re in danger of limiting the use of FG to high end
machines. I have a rea
73 matches
Mail list logo
