On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:53:25 -0500, Shad wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tim Moore wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Shad Young wrote:
> >
> >> Chris Metzler wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:14:06 -0500
> >>> Shad Young wrote:
> >>>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-12-16_02:53:51 (fredb)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/package/Win32-Inno/Attic/FlightGear-1.0.0.iss
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/package/Win32-Inno/Attic/FlightGear-1.0.0.iss
Prepare release 1.0.0
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-12-16_03:45:43 (sydadams)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Instruments-3d/primus-1000/p1000text.rgb
a few Primus 1000 updates ...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-12-17_15:08:21 (mfranz)
/va
Something bad happened to the b1900d FDM in CVS sometime in the last two
weeks (since my previous update from CVS). With the flaps fully extended
and the gear down, it's impossible to fly above stall speed unless the
aircraft is in a > 20 degree nose down attitude.
-c
--
Chris Metzler
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-12-18_16:25:24 (fredb)
/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/projects/VC7.1/SimGear.vcproj
Update MSVC 7.1 projects
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-12-21_00:24:54 (timoore)
/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/sim
ound at this site, or alterations thereof,
> > for profit."
> >
> > This is pretty representative of the terms I've seen for free MSFS
> > add-ons. It is not "open-source" or "free source" according to commonly
> > understood definitions of those words.
>
> My sincere apologies. It was not my inten
Csaba Halász a écrit :
> On Dec 23, 2007 2:25 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> sorry, it just says "can't find a file matching" for pa_ringbuffer.h
>> and pa_debugprint.h.
>>
>
> Interesting. Doing a search of all the files the string pa_ringbuffer
> is not mentioned anyw
On Dec 23, 2007 2:25 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sorry, it just says "can't find a file matching" for pa_ringbuffer.h
> and pa_debugprint.h.
Interesting. Doing a search of all the files the string pa_ringbuffer
is not mentioned anywhere.
Maybe you have another iaxclient on y
Csaba Halász a écrit :
> On Dec 22, 2007 11:36 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi alls,
>>
>> few issues with fgcom:
>>
>> - My PC is ready to test fgcom with jack, (adat card rme96/8) but I
>> can't manage to compile with: USE_PA_JACK=1,
>>
>> the first lines of error are:
>>
On Saturday 22 December 2007 02:27:20 pm gerard robin wrote:
> Bois Belleau
I was on the USS Plymouth Rock (LSD-29) which was a predecessor to that ship
and look forward to seeing it modeled.
-
This SF.net email is sponsore
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> Yet, we have such information out of YAsim, from AI ? (like said Csaba )
> fgfs --aircraft=WhichFly --carrier=WichFloat --parkpos=cat1
> FG place the WhichFly at the right place on the cat
Yes, but that's something else -- that's defined in th
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > It is the best way, to have in property the coordinates of the points
> > which are defined in the AI model (may be, the precision would a
> > problem)
>
> The properties are the smaller problem, whe
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> It is the best way, to have in property the coordinates of the points which
> are defined in the AI model (may be, the precision would a problem)
The properties are the smaller problem, whether they are inserted
via Nasal or automatically. The vect
On Dec 22, 2007 11:36 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi alls,
>
> few issues with fgcom:
>
> - My PC is ready to test fgcom with jack, (adat card rme96/8) but I
> can't manage to compile with: USE_PA_JACK=1,
>
> the first lines of error are:
>
> portaudio/src/hostapi/jack/pa_jack.c
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Csaba Halász -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > Well, the FGAICarrier code already finds catapult and wire nodes,
> > maybe we can just add them to the property tree there?
>
> But it does so as an OSG node visitor with intersection testing
> done b
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > The problem here is we don't have a generic solution this must
> > be calculated for each carrier or any AI object according to the
> > .xml file definition , one calculation for Nimitz one for Foch o
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> One could certainly get the values out, but that would be a
> lot more work.
Oh, and the manual way has the advantage that you can easily add
arbitrary stuff, such as other (non-cat) vertex offsets, or offsets
for places where no vertex is anywhere
* Csaba Halász -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> Well, the FGAICarrier code already finds catapult and wire nodes,
> maybe we can just add them to the property tree there?
But it does so as an OSG node visitor with intersection testing
done by OSG, or something. One could certainly get the values ou
On Dec 22, 2007 8:55 PM, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And even if: noting down offsets is something that we as modelers
> do all the time anyway, as we need it in animations.
Well, the FGAICarrier code already finds catapult and wire nodes,
maybe we can just add them to the proper
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> The problem here is we don't have a generic solution this must
> be calculated for each carrier or any AI object [...]
Ah, you want to avoid the calculation per object. Frankly, I don't
think that's such a generic problem. Most carrier capable aircra
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> The problem here is we don't have a generic solution this must
> be calculated for each carrier or any AI object according to the
> .xml file definition , one calculation for Nimitz one for Foch one
> for ... and so on.
That's not the problem.
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 7:46 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year)
> >
> > I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the
> > position of the aircra
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the
> position of the aircraft and the position of a specific point on an
> AI object in my case the catapult and the wires on the carrier.
> Is their any way (nasal ??) to get it out of
On Dec 22, 2007 7:46 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year)
>
> I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the position
> of the aircraft and the position of a specific point on an AI objec
Tim Moore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Shad Young wrote:
>
>> Chris Metzler wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:14:06 -0500
>>> Shad Young wrote:
>>>
>>>
(even MSFS has a large open source
base),
>>> Just curious w
Hello,
Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year)
I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the position
of the aircraft and the position of a specific point on an AI object in my
case the catapult and the wires on the carrier.
Is their any
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Shad Young
>
>
>> Sent: 21 December 2007 20:14
>> To: FlightGear developers discussions
>> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Terrasync for Windows
>>
>>
>> I have read through the archives about Terrasync. While I understand
>> Curt's motivation behind it, it does leave the va
jean pellotier wrote:
> - at last, something about sound card config, yesterday we tryed to
> be 3 in atc mode (a way to have air to air contact with curent fgcom)
> but it was impossible for me to understand what other said, because
> of lots of repeatable echo (suitable for reggae i think!!)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shad Young wrote:
> Chris Metzler wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:14:06 -0500
>> Shad Young wrote:
>>
>>> (even MSFS has a large open source
>>> base),
>>>
>> Just curious what you're referring to here? I have no doubt that there
>> is open s
* Curtis Olson -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> silent rejection == not enough time to think about it. :-)
Well, exactly one year and two days.
> when I get back maybe send me a reminder.
OK. :-)
m.
-
This SF.net email i
On Dec 21, 2007 11:26 PM, Forums Virgin Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I just Installed fgsetup-1.0.0.exe win32 release version on my
> Windows 2K system, and was disappointed to find an old issue with the BPP
> still set to 16 which on many (if not most) windows system's using an Nv
On Dec 22, 2007 10:18 AM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote:
> Could we, please, have ATOM/RSS support for the fgfs forum? There
> are complete solutions for the forum software phpBB available, and
> reportedly installed within minutes. For example:
>
> http://phpbb.potomactavern.org/smartfeed/
>
> Advanta
Could we, please, have ATOM/RSS support for the fgfs forum? There
are complete solutions for the forum software phpBB available, and
reportedly installed within minutes. For example:
http://phpbb.potomactavern.org/smartfeed/
Advantage: one can see new contributions in a newsreader and
quickly o
Shad Young schrieb:
> Chris Metzler wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:14:06 -0500
>> Shad Young wrote:
>>
>>
>>> (even MSFS has a large open source
>>> base),
>>>
>>>
>> Just curious what you're referring to here? I have no doubt that there
>> is open source/free software s
Is there anybody on the list with a real life Beech 99 in his neighbourhood who
can take some pictures or who has some pictures of the lower part of the panel
where the switches are, specially the left part and the part right of the
co-pilot? I've finished up a new 3d exterior model for the Bee
Chris Metzler wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:14:06 -0500
> Shad Young wrote:
>
>> (even MSFS has a large open source
>> base),
>>
>
> Just curious what you're referring to here? I have no doubt that there
> is open source/free software stuff out there relating to MSFS, but I dunno
> what
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > To me, these property are not declared twice, [...]
>
> The problem isn't that they are "declared" twice, but that there
> are two code parts that try to tie it, or the same code is run
> twice. And th
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> To me, these property are not declared twice, [...]
The problem isn't that they are "declared" twice, but that there
are two code parts that try to tie it, or the same code is run
twice. And this is certainly not a bug in your aircraft config.
m.
--
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > Failed to tie property /controls/gear/float-down to a pointer
>
> The error message is generated in JBSim/input_ouput/FGPropertyManager.cpp
> when SGPropertyNode::tie returned false. And this can only
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> Failed to tie property /controls/gear/float-down to a pointer
The error message is generated in JBSim/input_ouput/FGPropertyManager.cpp
when SGPropertyNode::tie returned false. And this can only be the case
if something tries to tie a property that is
Hello,
I wonder if there was not any modification about the sequence loading of
JSBsim during FlightGear start up.
With FlightGear V-1.0.0 (thanks to everybody who contribute to that great
release) , and with FG_osg, i get some warning message regarding JSBsim only:
Failed to tie property .
You might be interested in my compressed scenery project. This will fit the
entire
FlightGear world scenery in about 3.5 GB. This will require some updated
code in
SimGear to load the scenery. I can ship a modified FlightGear binary with
the
scenery package. And I would include an installer for Win
Hi,
The last day I played a little bit with Interactive
Traffic!
I took one of our aircrafts and noticed that the
traffic reacts on my own aircraft - it stops when I
"close" the taxiway with my aircraft! Also I noticed
that the flaps of the AI-A320 is driven, and also the
gear went up after start
Hi alls,
few issues with fgcom:
- My PC is ready to test fgcom with jack, (adat card rme96/8) but I
can't manage to compile with: USE_PA_JACK=1,
the first lines of error are:
portaudio/src/hostapi/jack/pa_jack.c:71:27: error: pa_ringbuffer.h:
Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type
portaudio/s
44 matches
Mail list logo
