It was looking for tags in the -set.xml file ... I changed it
to stop looking after the first one.
Curt.
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Alexis Bory - xiii
wrote:
> Curtis Olson wrote:
> > These aircraft download packages as well as the download page is all
> > autogenerated from scripts, a
The Slackware packages for the latest release are now available in the
usual place:
http://flightgear.stockill.org.uk
Jon
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel
I wrote
> Melchior FRANZ wrote
>
> > * Durk Talsma -- Sunday 21 December 2008:
> > > current 1.9.0 version of FlightGear is build upon the critically
> > acclaimed
> >
> snip
>
>
> > > - AI code can generate wingmen
> >
> > That's not strictly an AI thing AFAIK, but submodels with some
> > Nas
Hi Curt,
two pages are suspect :
http://www.flightgear.org/Downloads/binary.shtml ( no mention of 1.9.0 )
http://www.flightgear.org/Downloads/ ( still 0.9.10 scenery )
Do you wait the announcement to update them.
By the way, it is not clear that the direct links to the mirrors in the main
page a
Curtis Olson wrote:
> These aircraft download packages as well as the download page is all
> autogenerated from scripts, and all the information about authors and
> versions is contained within your aircraft. If you have any
> questions, look at an example aircraft that does things the way you
> Hi,
>
> In preparation for the official v1.9.0 release
> announcement, I've made many
> updates to the flightgear web site and download pages,
> including many
> updates to the aircraft downloads page. It would be great
> if as many people
> as possible could go through the web site and try t
Hi,
In preparation for the official v1.9.0 release announcement, I've made many
updates to the flightgear web site and download pages, including many
updates to the aircraft downloads page. It would be great if as many people
as possible could go through the web site and try the various links and
Melchior FRANZ wrote
> * Durk Talsma -- Sunday 21 December 2008:
> > current 1.9.0 version of FlightGear is build upon the critically
> acclaimed
>
snip
> > - AI code can generate wingmen
>
> That's not strictly an AI thing AFAIK, but submodels with some
> Nasal controlling code, and it's onl
On Sunday 21 December 2008 18:05:33 Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Thanks. I've added and fixed all these points.
Cheers,
Durk
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@list
* Durk Talsma -- Sunday 21 December 2008:
> current 1.9.0 version of FlightGear is build upon the critically acclaimed
built
> capabilities. To make use of FlightGear's rich feature set, OpenSceneGraph
> 2.7.3 is minimally required. While the most dramatic changes to FlightGear
But 2.7.8 is re
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 02:50 -0700, John Denker wrote:
> On 12/20/2008 10:39 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
>
> > Here is a dynamometer test report of an engine intended for use in an
> > aircraft:
> > http://members.cox.net/alg3/Dynamometer%20test%20report.htm
>
> Ah, good, that's useful data.
>
> > Plea
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Please find an announcement text and a short summary of the major
developments that have been leading up to the 1.9.0 release. Please have a
look and let me know if I have missed anything:
If I'm correct, the binaries for the windows and Mac platforms are available,
and
* Maik Justus -- Saturday 20 December 2008:
> Is there any chance to get to know at compile time, that
> openal-soft is used?
I haven't found anything specific in the header files.
At runtime, alGetString(AL_VERSION) should contain " ALSOFT ".
m.
-
* Melchior Franz -- Sunday 21 December 2008:
> Modified Files:
> SGMaterialAnimation.cxx
> Log Message:
>
> Merge branch 'master' of ../.sg.osg
Whoops, sorry. I thought this problem with my git<=>cvs gateway
wouldn't happen any more. The correct log text is the following
(and it's also fix
I wrote :
> Csaba wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> > >
> > > The patch below backs out that change. Unfortunately this means the change
> > > to the cloud coverage due to changing METAR will not be reflected in the
> > > 3D
> > clouds
> > > (2D clouds are una
On 12/20/2008 10:39 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
> Here is a dynamometer test report of an engine intended for use in an
> aircraft:
> http://members.cox.net/alg3/Dynamometer%20test%20report.htm
Ah, good, that's useful data.
> Please note especially the RPM v. Manifold Pressure chart at the end:
> http
16 matches
Mail list logo
