On 20 Jun 2009, at 14:42, Martin Spott wrote:
Yup - the DME element of an [ILS,VORTAC,VOR-DME,NDB-DME] is to be a
separate entity in the 'nav.dat' file by definition,
Okay, which leaves the other issue: ADF. Neither the generic adf.cxx
nor kr87.cxx search ILS stations. Looking at this PDF:
James Turner wrote:
On 20 Jun 2009, at 14:42, Martin Spott wrote:
Yup - the DME element of an [ILS,VORTAC,VOR-DME,NDB-DME] is to be a
separate entity in the 'nav.dat' file by definition,
Okay, which leaves the other issue: ADF. Neither the generic adf.cxx
nor kr87.cxx search ILS
James Turner wrote:
Okay, which leaves the other issue: ADF. Neither the generic adf.cxx
nor kr87.cxx search ILS stations. Looking at this PDF:
https://www.bendixking.com/servlet/com.honeywell.aes.utility.PDFDownLoadServlet?FileName=/static/brochures/pdf/kr87.pdf
makes me think
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/MPCarrier
In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18340
Modified Files:
help.xml
Log Message:
Update to reflect recent changes
Please excuse my curiosity: Isn't the number of consecutive empty lines
pretty
It seems that the license header of simgear/screen/texture.{cxx,hxx}
does not have the same LGPL header as the rest of the sources. In fact,
it says that the code is freely distributable, but not freely
modifiable. Is this file really under an Open Source license? Could you
clarify (at least for
Hi ?
o...@arcticnet.no a écrit :
It seems that the license header of simgear/screen/texture.{cxx,hxx}
does not have the same LGPL header as the rest of the sources. In fact,
it says that the code is freely distributable, but not freely
modifiable. Is this file really under an Open Source
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi ?
o...@arcticnet.no a écrit :
It seems that the license header of simgear/screen/texture.{cxx,hxx}
does not have the same LGPL header as the rest of the sources. In fact,
it says that the code is freely distributable, but not freely
modifiable. Is this file
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 7:24 AM, o...@arcticnet.no wrote:
It seems that the license header of simgear/screen/texture.{cxx,hxx}
does not have the same LGPL header as the rest of the sources. In fact,
it says that the code is freely distributable, but not freely
modifiable. Is this file really
Tim Moore a écrit :
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi ?
o...@arcticnet.no a écrit :
It seems that the license header of simgear/screen/texture.{cxx,hxx}
does not have the same LGPL header as the rest of the sources. In fact,
it says that the code is freely distributable, but not freely
Curtis Olson skrev:
Are we running on the assumption that we can only do what is
expressly allowed?
When it comes to someone else's copyright, it's not only an assumption.
It's the law. And Debian is adamant about following it... so, yes.
Thanks.
Curtis Olson wrote:
I don't see any thing in the license terms that states we cannot modify
the code. Are we running on the assumption that we can only do what is
expressly allowed? Perhaps Erik Hofman should address this. As I look
at the code I see it's a full C++ class. But I'm
Looking at the code it is heavily modified in the mean time, although
parts of the original texture loading code are still in place.
Erik
--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
I've tried to figure out the origin of that code, and it seems there's
consensus that Kilgard's code really cannot be modified.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGL_Utility_Toolkit
Kilgard's GLUT library is no longer maintained, and its license did not
permit the redistribution of modified
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 14:24 +0200, o...@arcticnet.no wrote:
It seems that the license header of simgear/screen/texture.{cxx,hxx}
does not have the same LGPL header as the rest of the sources. In fact,
it says that the code is freely distributable, but not freely
modifiable. Is this file really
On 20 Jun 2009, at 12:12, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Better with that added spaces past the '\' ?
Sadly it made no difference - I already tried that fix locally.
James
--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the
On Sunday 21 June 2009 19:30:32 James Turner wrote:
On 20 Jun 2009, at 12:12, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Better with that added spaces past the '\' ?
Sadly it made no difference - I already tried that fix locally.
Use a multi-line comment. /* and */, then the warning goes away. It can be
Ron Jensen skrev:
I think this 5 year old bug might help answer the question
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=131997
Hmm, thanks. I guess I can show them that, then, when I package simgear
up again. Hopefully it's enough.
I am not sure if texture.{cxx,hxx} qualifies as a
o...@arcticnet.no skrev:
Ron Jensen skrev:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glut/libglut3_3.7-25_all.deb
Yes, but it's in the oldlibs section. No current package in Debian use
it. Everything is linked against freeglut, which supersedes it.
Upon further examination, I'll have to
Can we just quote Mark Kilgard's comment in that thread that modification is
fine? I like Debian and I ran their distribution on my machines for many
years. I admire how carefully they follow through with these licensing
issues ... but my word ... no wonder their package versions are 4 years
Curtis Olson skrev:
Can we just quote Mark Kilgard's comment in that thread that
modification is fine?
That's what I plan to do for now.
I like Debian and I ran their distribution on my
machines for many years. I admire how carefully they follow through
with these licensing issues ... but
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:33 PM, wrote:
... [curt] no wonder their package versions are 4 years behind every other
distribution.
Oh, why is that?
That was said mostly in jest. Maybe I should have said, by the time Debian
finalizes a release, the kids who watched the pixar movie with the
I haven't had a chance to contact Butterfly Media myself, but perhaps
someone here would be willing to pull lead on that?
http://www.butterfly-media.co.uk/index.htm
This weekend I was contacted by an ebay seller. I did a quick google search
and found that his ebay ads had ripped off our
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 03:30 +0200, o...@arcticnet.no wrote:
o...@arcticnet.no skrev:
Ron Jensen skrev:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glut/libglut3_3.7-25_all.deb
Yes, but it's in the oldlibs section. No current package in Debian use
it. Everything is linked against
23 matches
Mail list logo
