On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 16:03 -0700, John Denker wrote:
> 2) There is no doubt that there is frequency pairing for
>collocated VOR/DME. The pairing scheme for DME/VOR,
>DME/MLS, and DME/ILS/MLS are documented starting on
>page 3-100 of ICAO Annex 10 Volume 1 "Aeronautical
>Communica
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 19:45 +0200, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 06 September 2009 21:42:36 Ron Jensen wrote:
> > Sometime recently MP Models silently became "solid." IMHO, this is a
> > horrid state. Aircraft now "crash" when new aircraft appear at the same
> > spawn site.
> >
> >
Hi Pete,
Thanks for reporting this. I've temporarily fixed this by removing
the language links at the bottom. I'll look into fixing the root
cause of this problem, however, we don't have the same setup as
Wikipedia (one server per language) and a direct copy won't always
work the same way.
On
AC001 wrote:
> Just a thought. The glide slope tunnel appears on 28R. So I set my
> startup to be 28L.
>
> pete
>
Oops forgot the link to this wiki page.
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/San_Francisco_International_Airport
> George Patterson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:21 AM,
Just a thought. The glide slope tunnel appears on 28R. So I set my
startup to be 28L.
pete
George Patterson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
>> Hmmm...
>>
>> For a short time this might be helping but
>>
>>
>>
>>> I have disabled the MP Aircrafts colli
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, AC001 wrote:
> Not sure who the admin is for the wiki, so I thought I'm mail this list.
>
> This page http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Air_bagan
>
To help narrowing it down: It's appears to be only that page as I was
able to login and browse some of the other
Not sure who the admin is for the wiki, so I thought I'm mail this list.
This page http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Air_bagan
Shows this error
Database error
A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in
the software. The last attempted database query was:
Sorry , I was not reading closely enough ...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> syd adams wrote:
>
> > I know , it's wikipedia , but it gives a short explanation of the VOR
> -DME
> > pairing ...
>
> I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
> (including
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hmmm...
>
> For a short time this might be helping but
>
>
>>I have disabled the MP Aircrafts collisions with the rest of the world.
>
> ... but we also have a lot of AI aircrafts around and they don't announce
> there incoming. That make
OK, so I guess that was entirely my fault on not tuning the DME to the
DME on the NDB-DME station. Blame Atlas for that! :D
Sorry for starting such an OT discussion :P
> On 09/10/09 14:11, willie wrote:
>
>>> I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
>>> (including me) are
On 09/10/09 14:11, willie wrote:
>> I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
>> (including me) are doubtful about the pairing of a DME with an NDB,
> Here's a real-world discussion showing that they really do exist.
> http://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-77933.html
It
Martin Spott wrote:
> syd adams wrote:
>
>> I know , it's wikipedia , but it gives a short explanation of the VOR -DME
>> pairing ...
>
> I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
> (including me) are doubtful about the pairing of a DME with an NDB,
>
> Martin.
Here's
You need to include some recently added files to your projects.
FGGyro.cxx/hxx, AIGroundVehicle.cxx/hxx, SGText.cxx/hxx. The clue is in the
errors! That might make at least some of the problems go away.
HTH
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: Randall Green [mailto:randall.gr...@wrig
syd adams wrote:
> I know , it's wikipedia , but it gives a short explanation of the VOR -DME
> pairing ...
I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
(including me) are doubtful about the pairing of a DME with an NDB,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
Hmmm...
For a short time this might be helping but
>I have disabled the MP Aircrafts collisions with the rest of the world.
... but we also have a lot of AI aircrafts around and they don't announce there
incoming. That makes it very realistic and a lot of fun, then now you really
have to
Hi,
I've updated the patches.
I tested these, with the code as of a few hours ago, on both Mac and
ubuntu-9.04 on vmware, and these work fine on both (with or without
--with-eventinput configure option).
Now I can say it is safe to apply, so please commit these patches.
Don't forget to run auto
Hi,
On Monday 07 September 2009 15:06:56 Marco Lecora wrote:
> Could someone help me with this issue please?Thank you in advance
The position is the cartesian coordinate vector in the WGS84 earth centered
coordinate system. And the orientation quaternion is that one that rotates a
vector in ea
Hi all,
I'm compiling the newest CVS versions of FlightGear/SimGear and I'm
getting the following link errors:
Linking fgviewer, after this warning:
LINK : warning LNK4098: defaultlib 'LIBCMTD' conflicts with use of other libs;
use /NODEFAULTLIB:library
4>simgear_d.lib(SGReaderWriterXML.obj) :
I'm out of the office at the moment but when I return I can change strtof()
back to strtod(). I didn't realize that was missing in windows. Or if
someone else beats me to it that's fine too. This fixes a precision issue
for doubles when replaying ascii format files.
--
Curt
On Sep 10, 2009 1:5
So in generic.cxx, at line 381, I suggest using *strtod* instead, since the
value is cast to float anyway on the next line.
I gather this change (separate case for float and double) is the fix for
choppy replays ?
Cheers,
Nic
--
Be Kind.
Remember, everyone is fighting a hard battle.
--
Never mind, found the actual codeline, where the mask is set.
Cheers,
Nic
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Nicolas Quijano wrote:
> Rest of the world ? That's not good if you mean it literally : no more
> carrier landings, no more field landings, no more landing on building
> tops... Surely, you
Rest of the world ? That's not good if you mean it literally : no more
carrier landings, no more field landings, no more landing on building
tops... Surely, you don't mean the rest of the world, do you ?
Instead of enabling/disabling it in code, why the resistance at giving us a
property to turn it
Hi,
On Sunday 06 September 2009 21:42:36 Ron Jensen wrote:
> Sometime recently MP Models silently became "solid." IMHO, this is a
> horrid state. Aircraft now "crash" when new aircraft appear at the same
> spawn site.
>
> To say I am upset about this "feature" is an understatement. I feel I
>
Hi,
Sorry for not reading the mails in time.
But Yes, I introduced that problem and fixed it already.
Sorry!
Anyway the intention of these changes is to move all osg dependencies out of
scenegraph neutral code like the math stuff.
I now definitely know people who want to use that tool classes w
Hi all,
Here is a patch to restore Gerard's SR71-BlackBird to (mostly) working
condition after the recent rounds of JSBSim updates.
http://pastebin.ca/1557510
Could someone apply it, as IIRC Gerard isn't maintaining it CVS anymore?
(I hope I'm wrong, though)
Cheers,
Anders
--
--
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Randall Green wrote:
> These are the instructions for checking out CVS OSG that are given:
>
> cvs
> -d:pserver:anonym...@openscenegraph.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openscenegraph
> login
>
> cvs -z3
> -d:pserver:anonym...@openscenegraph.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsro
These are the instructions for checking out CVS OSG that are given:
cvs
-d:pserver:anonym...@openscenegraph.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openscenegraph
login
cvs -z3
-d:pserver:anonym...@openscenegraph.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openscenegraph
co -P modulename
What is the modulename? I
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:37 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 10 Sep 2009, at 11:15, James Turner wrote:
>
> > The last part I'm not totally sure about - it makes localizers
> > *very* sensitive - maybe I've adapted the code incorrectly, but this
> > doc:
> >
> > http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aer
On 10 Sep 2009, at 11:15, James Turner wrote:
> The last part I'm not totally sure about - it makes localizers
> *very* sensitive - maybe I've adapted the code incorrectly, but this
> doc:
>
> http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aerojava/ILS.htm
>
> indicates that at 10nm, the beam should be app
On 09/10/2009 01:00 AM, Tim Moore wrote:
> so I'm not touching that. Instead, it looks like "Two-parameter physics-based
> model of atmosphere up to 262,467 ft i.e. the top of the mesosphere. Correctly
> exhibits the HALT phenomenon." would be awesome to have and is relatively
> independent of th
On 10 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Tim Moore wrote:
There are a lot of changes to
navradio.[ch]xx, but you and James are in heated discussion,
so I'm not touching that.
Since I'm now official maintainer of the nav-radio (it's a rare
honour), and feel a bit more comfortable with the code, I had a go
Nic,
Thanks for this. The reason that models wander into the air is that the
height test is finding the model itself. The solution I have been using is
to add:
false
to the model .xml file. This means that the Ground Vehicles still "see"
buildings, but of co
On 9 Sep 2009, at 22:55, John Denker wrote:
> If you really want to rip out the old outputs, in the
> name of "internal cleanliness" or whatever, that can wait
With apologies to Dave Perry, I think upon reflection (and converting
some aircraft over myself), that waiting a bit longer here does
33 matches
Mail list logo
