Am 24.11.10 21:42, schrieb James Turner:
>
> On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:32, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
>> What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
>> block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy
>> for multiple software packages.
>
> I would o
Will look later this day
On 11/24/2010 03:32 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> >But the
>
> >737-300 fails C172P and others work.
>
>
> I guess still the problem is is the undefined property.
>
> Does this help you:
> http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=10063#p103256
>
> ?
>
Hi,
>But the
>737-300 fails C172P and others work.
I guess still the problem is is the undefined property.Does this help you:
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=10063#p103256?
Heiko
--
Increase Visibi
No Sir;
I do know it needed a "--aircraft=" but I checked on the net for things
XML/xml and came up with nothing of value. This is SuSE 11.4 M3 and it
still reads that error. I am updating a CVS/GIT type version,
recompiling Simgear (no help) and going to try FlightGear next. But the
737-30
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:03:02 -0800 (PST), Gene wrote in message
:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > *VERY* cool stuff, and not "OT" at all!!! Are you going to sell
> > kits?
..mylar space blanket type metall foil? Round the edges
around the "bath tub" and paint the box to thro
On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:32, Curtis Olson wrote:
> What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
> block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy for
> multiple software packages.
I would once again plead for the ads to be removed from flig
Curtis Olson wrote:
> What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
> block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy
> for multiple software packages.
Yup, and it's done pretty cleverly: The URL which is being shown when
you move the mouse
Yep, since a long, long time now, to be honest
The wiki as representing official Homepage would be the better answer!
still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html
But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html
--- Martin Spott schrieb am Mi, 24.11.2010:
Von: Martin Spott
Bet
What's the actual link (I can't read the full url from your image). We can
block specific ads if we need to, but easynewstore.com is clearly a proxy
for multiple software packages.
Thanks,
Curt.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > I made a few twea
Curtis Olson wrote:
> I made a few tweaks and posted a copy of this here:
>
>http://www.flightgear.org/flightprosim.html
Just looked at this page, noticed one of these obnoxious Google ads on
the right - guess to where this leads when you click onto the ad
http://foxtrot.mgras.net/st
I managed to install and play for a while
Mad a flight KMCO - KATL KATL - KDFWand then KDFW to KJFK
halfway on the last leg it crashes, it crashes around KJFK many times
Now I'm trying again from KLAX and it crashed again
Below is the report generated any advice??
Thanks
Process:
Hi Stuart,
I made a few tweaks and posted a copy of this here:
http://www.flightgear.org/flightprosim.html
Thanks for putting this all together!
Curt.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> > Ok, Stuart and Martin
Thorsten wrote
> -Original Message-
> From:.i.r...@jyu.fi [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi]
> Sent: 24 November 2010 10:21
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Nonfunctional airplanes
>
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> For what it's worth, the complete set of commandline options was
>
> --disable-fullscreen --geometry=800x600 --disable-real-weather-fetch
> --airport=TNCM --timeofday=noon --enable-auto-coordination
> --aircraft=
I'll try some of the aircraft using these settings.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Donn Washburn wrote:
> It also seems that the most recent fgdata (todays version) gives this error
> d...@m1l-susehs:~> fgfs aircraft=737-300
> Processing command line arguments
> Fatal error: Failed to open file
> at aircraft=737-300
> (received from SimGear XML
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
> Gene Buckle wrote:
>
>> I was talking to Tim about this today. If the required image distortion
>> functionality is implemented by the next FSWeekend, the FlightGear booth
>> could shut down the whole show. :)
>
> I think we already started paving the wa
>> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
>> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some
>> people.
> []
>> c182rg
>
> I just picked this one as a random item from your list and I'm happy to
> state that it runs and flies properly for me (rea
Gene Buckle wrote:
> I was talking to Tim about this today. If the required image distortion
> functionality is implemented by the next FSWeekend, the FlightGear booth
> could shut down the whole show. :)
I think we already started paving the way with this year's
presentation ;-)
Mar
> Hansajet
Fixed.
Torsten
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get sta
Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 11:21:07, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi a écrit :
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
>
> I have not taken care to make sure the problem persists in more recent
Hi,
>I had the same result with the 737-300 back a while ago.
>It would take off and climb and then nosed into the ground
>All other planes I tried didn't act like that.
That's Pilot Error- just keep to the weigh, speed and flapssetting given in the
Help menu. Like in real life. Based on the re
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>> http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll/collimated_display.html
>>
>> Sorry - we're VERY proud of this. (and yes, I've briefly considered
>> yelling about it from my roof-top *laughs*)
>>
>> g.
>>
> Have you ever been to Lelystad? FSWeekend is _the_ place to
I had the same result with the 737-300 back a while ago.
It would take off and climb and then nosed into the ground
All other planes I tried didn't act like that.
It also seems that the most recent fgdata (todays version) gives this error
d...@m1l-susehs:~> fgfs aircraft=737-300
Processing command
> http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll/collimated_display.html
>
> Sorry - we're VERY proud of this. (and yes, I've briefly considered
> yelling about it from my roof-top *laughs*)
>
> g.
>
Have you ever been to Lelystad? FSWeekend is _the_ place to present this to
the public!
Congrats, cool stuf
Hi,
I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
I have not taken care to make sure the problem persists in more recent
pulls, and I have not tried to find out if a quirk in my system us
respon
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
[]
> c182rg
I just picked this one as a random item from your list and I'm happy to
state that it runs and flies pr
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
> *VERY* cool stuff, and not "OT" at all!!! Are you going to sell kits?
>
Not a chance. We're not even sure if we can give plans away. We
referenced a few active patents in the mirror itself. The next iteration
we're going to try to eliminate that. I
*VERY* cool stuff, and not "OT" at all!!! Are you going to sell kits?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Gene Buckle wrote:
>
> http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll/collimated_display.html
>
> Sorry - we're VERY proud of this. (and yes, I've briefly considered
> yelling about it from my roof-top *lau
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll/collimated_display.html
Sorry - we're VERY proud of this. (and yes, I've briefly considered
yelling about it from my roof-top *laughs*)
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The Me
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
>
> I have not taken care to make sure the problem persists in more recent
> pulls, and I have
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:21:07 +0200 (EET)
thorsten.i.renk wrote:
> I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
> thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
> lightning
In what way was the Lightning non-functional? I've certainly not had
Hi,
A question not directly related to FGFS, but GIT.
I run into the problem that I have now about 12608 loose Objects.
But packaging them let me drive into a bigger problem: "Out of memory, malloc
failed (tried to allocate 819224306 bytes)Error: failed to tun repack"
I already tried to repack man
I've just completed a sweep through all available aircraft in GIT, and I
thought a list of the non-functional ones might be useful for some people.
I have not taken care to make sure the problem persists in more recent
pulls, and I have not tried to find out if a quirk in my system us
responsible
Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> I'd love to be the guinea pig to experiment with high-res terrain in fgfs,
> although I'm not a programmer. I'll have a high-end hex core PC soon, which
> I'm
> sure could be put to good use testing modified terragear to create high-res
> terrain...
The good old rule
?I doubt this is pay-per-click, so just clicking on the ads could be
ineffective or couter-effective. However the strategy of reporting the ads
is potentially a better one, particularly if enough people get involved
I've dispatched two ads this morning via the X button:
"No 1 Flight Simulator"
Curtis Olson wrote:
> It's new news to me ... that's really cool! Looks like a much more complete
> data set than SRTM.
Sort of but among those who did a review, the current release is
widely considered as being of "experimental or research grade". See
also:
http://www.ersdac.or.jp/GDEM
36 matches
Mail list logo
