On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 02:39:42 +0200, Robert wrote in message
BANLkTi=osyhxkaoky-c8pa71sqk1t3p...@mail.gmail.com:
2011/4/20 Robert dogg...@googlemail.com
here is a screenshot:
http://img251.imageshack.us/i/fgfsscreen077.png/
..hum, bright white nose, external screen shots?
If you ask
Hi,
you can download my fgdata bundle from here [1]. You can (and should)
verify it with provided hashes and signature (GPG). After that you can
extract it with gitbundle (or so). The usage of that tool should be
widely documented.
Anyway, I like your idea (and many others here as well) because
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:17:35 +0200, Roland wrote in message
1303319855.23358.110.camel@quix0r:
Hi,
you can download my fgdata bundle from here [1]. You can (and should)
verify it with provided hashes and signature (GPG). After that you can
extract it with gitbundle (or so). The usage of
Hi,
will be fixed soon. Thanks. :-)
Roland
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:05 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..should say: wget -c \
http://flightgear.mxchange.org/pub/fgfs/fgdata.bundle
so the download can be resumed if it stalls or somesuch,
rather than try wget the whole bundle into
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote:
..should say: wget -c \
http://flightgear.mxchange.org/pub/fgfs/fgdata.bundle
so the download can be resumed if it stalls or somesuch,
rather than try wget the whole bundle into fgdata.bundle.1,
fgdata.bundle.2 because etc
Geoff McLane wrote:
I know and read some, like Martin, want to go perhaps
another direction, and that too is fine...
Well, what I am (we are) having in mind is to provide some sort of a
scenery root node to FlightGear in the way like you're typically
referencing OpenFlight scenarios. This
Hi,
I have updated my little website, plus the fgdata.bundle and all
checksum files and signature.
I will try to add a shell script to automatically recreate the bundle
including all checksum files (signature is STRONGLY not recommended with
automatism because you need give the server your
Something I've always thought about is an official aircraft repository
that contained non-GPL2 aircraft- straight from the authors, of course.
There are many aircraft for FlightGear that are not GPL-licensed (some
of them very well-developed, like the Tu-154b and the MD-81), and I
think it'd be
Ryan M tpbspamm...@gmail.com writes:
Something I've always thought about is an official aircraft repository
that contained non-GPL2 aircraft- straight from the authors, of course.
There are many aircraft for FlightGear that are not GPL-licensed (some
of them very well-developed, like the
I appreciate your effort Roland. I hope this workarround doesn't take
the momentum from the original endeavor, though.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:17:43AM +0200, Roland Häder wrote:
Hi,
I have updated my little website, plus the fgdata.bundle and all
checksum files and signature.
I will
10 matches
Mail list logo