.."protection under the GPL", depends on a willingness on the
part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
under copyright law to defend or enforce their copyrights.
..if there is no such willingness in any FlightGear author,
there is no legal protection of FlightGear, and
On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
> quote fred: "There is nothing that could prevent to release it under the
> GPL, but in
> the light of
> recent events (read FPS) I am not fond of releasing something that
> couldn't be used.."
Don't cut quotes. Fred actually agreed to release it under the
Hal,
Glad to be able to help. I'm looking forward to your corrected model, then
I'll use it in part or in for the TR1133. As you probably know, the SCR-522
was the TR1133 built initially under a UK contract in the US. The TR1133
transmitter and receiver were reworked by Bendix into a single uni
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
<4def2504.8020...@gmail.com>:
> On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
> > If you really want to fight those scamers, there's a very simple
> > way to do that: inform people.
..about what, FlightGear authors lack of willingness
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
> <4def2504.8020...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
>
>> > If you really want to fight those scamers, there's a very simple
>> > way to do that: inform people.
>
> ..about what, Flig
Hi,
why make it all so complicated? FGFS is GNU GPL (2/3?). Report that scam
to the FSF (Free Software Foundation). Maybe you will get nothing better
back than just to report that video to youtube (show prove to youtube,
and they must listen) but at least their scamming activity becomes more
popul
> .."protection under the GPL", depends on a willingness on the
> part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
> under copyright law to defend or enforce their copyrights.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see how willingness to exercise
copyright under GPL would require movin
Am 08.06.11 07:43, schrieb Michael Sgier:
> why not simply change the fgfs licence once and for all? Android is not all
> GPL anymore...we could do the very same.-
>
Why not throwing all the sources to trash and tell people the project
does not exist anymore ? :-)
No licence change has to be p
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote
in message
<54776.130.234.144.77.1307524008.squir...@webmail3.cc.jyu.fi>:
> > .."protection under the GPL", depends on a willingness on the
> > part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
> > under copyright
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:13:42 +0200, HB-GRAL wrote in message
<4def4b56.1080...@sablonier.ch>:
> Am 08.06.11 07:43, schrieb Michael Sgier:
> > why not simply change the fgfs licence once and for all? Android is
> > not all GPL anymore...we could do the very same.-
> >
>
> Why not throwing all the
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:44:25 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
> > <4def2504.8020...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
> >
> >> > If you really want to fight those scamers,
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 12:27:30 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote
> in message
>
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see how willingness to exercise
> > copyright under GPL would require moving to a different license.
>
> ..you as
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 20:18 -0500 schrieb Curtis Olson:
> This weekend I took the plunge and upgraded my main desktop machine to
> Fedora 15 + Gnome 3. Out of the gate I hit some serious culture
> shock, but I'm starting to get the hang of the new gnome interface and
> it's growing on me qui
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 08:19 +0200 schrieb Stefan Seifert:
> Would you really want to restrict the very freedoms that made FlightGear such
> a successful project, just to have some legal means against some shady people
> who try to fool the uninformed into paying some money for FG? Chances
> Oliver wrote:
>
> This guy is allready calling its product "Microsoft Flight Simulator
> 2011", so he doesn't even care about the trademarks of Microsoft
> products or its company name.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SX56YCTc5M
Now that video IS a copyright violation. It is a copy of Oscar's
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Robert wrote:
> Look what I have found on Dailymotion:
>
> http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgg2j5_next-generation-flight-simulator-2011-2012-demo_videogames
> http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xh4vzn_pro-flight-simulator-2011-review-1_videogames
> http://www.dailymotion.com/vid
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> .."protection under the GPL", depends on a willingness on the
> part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
> under copyright law to defend or enforce their copyrights.
>
Arnt, while the PFS guys are doing morally despicable things, th
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Martin Spott wrote:
>> ..easy now, without a willingness to defend FlightGear copyright,
>
> Just a repetition of the above. Oh my, what an outstanding example of
> canned nonsense,
>
Yeah, but he stamps "New and Improved!" on his can of nonsense, so it's
ok, right? *snickers*
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2011 12:27:30 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote
>> in message
>>
>>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see how willingness to exercise
>>> copyright under GPL would requi
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:05:07 -0700 (PDT), Gene Buckle
wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
>>
>> .."protection under the GPL", depends on a willingness on the
>> part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
>> under copyright law to defend or enforce their copyrigh
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:24 PM, David Van Mosselbeen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just download the source code of that magic scam at
> http://proflightsimulator.com/source/Source-Files.7z
This was discussed ad naseum quite some time ago on this
list and on the forums.
Those unfamiliar are welcome to
Ahoy Scenery Guys,
two things related to the transitional solution
"use-custom-scenery-data" I stumbled on:
No. 1)
As Csaba already pointed out a few days ago[1], aren't the files named
"ICAO.parking.xml" in $fgdata/Scenery/Airports/I/C/A/ supposed to be
named as "ICAO.groundnet.xml" in order to
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:47:52 +0200, Stefan wrote in message
<201106081247.52326.n...@detonation.org>:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2011 12:27:30 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi
> > wrote in message
> >
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't s
> ..correct, once they are defended. Our current practice is
> effectively a license alongside the GPL, until someone gets
> off his ass and defends his copyright on his own GPL code.
Ask gpl-violations.org for help. They have already solved some cases.
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
I ran some tests yesterday about the possibility of using static jetways
as placeholders. At KSFO, with animated jetways disabled and no dynamic
jetway models at all, FPS was at about 32-33 on my system. With animated
jetways, it plummeted to 15-16. When I used
$FG_ROOT/Models/Airport/jetway.xml as
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..our current "GPL" practice [...]
Arnt, for what stupid reason are you using the terms "we" and "our" ?
Except from annoying the developer's mailing list with unwanted
outpourings you have not been involved in the FlightGear project at
all, at least not for the last twelve
http://hsf-sulzbach.de/indexz51X.php
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> http://hsf-sulzbach.de/indexz51X.php
>
Stuart, your yahoo account has been comprimised. Please change your
password asap!
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The Me-10
Please ignore the message below, it appears my email account has been hacked.
-Stuart
- Original Message
> From: Stuart Buchanan
> To: tors...@t3r.de; effly...@yahoogroups.com; olivier.faivr...@gmail.com;
>fakesexnoi...@googlemail.com; fergus_mc_c...@yahoo.com; will...@gmail.com;
>
More spam on yahoo accounts?
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessi
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Ryan M wrote:
> More spam on yahoo accounts?
>
I think what is happening is people might be getting whacked by drive-by
browser attacks or something else. What I've been seeing is a number of
people with Yahoo addresses getting hit like this - it seems to be pretty
platform
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:59:23 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > ..our current "GPL" practice [...]
>
> Arnt, for what stupid reason are you using the terms "we" and "our" ?
> Except from annoying the developer's mailing list with unwanted
> outpourings you have no
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:57:46 -0700 (PDT), Gene wrote in message
:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Ryan M wrote:
>
> > More spam on yahoo accounts?
> >
> I think what is happening is people might be getting whacked by
> drive-by browser attacks or something else. What I've been seeing is
> a number of peop
Hi,
Flightgear Mac OS X site also has a note. See
http://macflightgear.sf.net/home/downloads
By the way, one thing I really hate about these products is that they "skip"
supporting users. As a result, more than 30 users yelled at me like:
"hey, I got your product but I can't launch it success
Alex D-HUND wrote:
> two things related to the transitional solution
> "use-custom-scenery-data" I stumbled on:
The recommended way of defining Scenery directories is to put multiple
directories into the "Scenery-Path", whereas the TerraSync-directory
should be precede the Base Package Sceners. S
Martin Spott wrote:
> The recommended way of defining Scenery directories is to put multiple
> directories into the "Scenery-Path", whereas the TerraSync-directory
> should be precede the Base Package Sceners. See also:
Please excuse my typos and spelling mistakes, I'm simply too tired,
36 matches
Mail list logo
