on, 30 Sep 2013 12:52:08 +0100
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPS - merge request
On 30 Sep 2013, at 12:29, Eric van den Berg
wrote:The other stuff I asked Dirk to add as it makes our extra500 (GPSS) AP
design a lot easier.
Incidentally if you
It actually does solve issue 1164 (which I started).
When one switches to the next waypoint, the active leg course and x-track-error
relate to the leg between the previous and active waypoint of the flightplan
(as it should in LEG mode). Previously the leg (-course and x-track-error) was
forme
On 05/22/2013 01:16 PM, Clement de l'Hamaide wrote:
- Use 25KHz step frequencies (118.175, 124.225...)
how about 8.33kHz spacing?
You are aware that from next year 8.33Mhz spacing is mandatory for IFR
in Europe (and already is above FL195)?
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/833-khz
Note
= 2.065 kJ/kg K @20degC, approx linear to 2.710 @140degC
hope this might improve accuracy (a bit),
Cheers,
Eric
On 12/11/2012 07:35 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 09:46:10 Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
>> I see.
>> Looking at the code (I think) I can see you ar
nics.com
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:20:23 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSim Piston Engine Idle
>
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 00:55:35 Eric van den Berg wrote:
> > Ron,
> >
> > From experience: the lyco I
Ron,
>From experience: the lyco IO540 idles at 14-15 inHG, 900RPM (MT-prop with
>P-880-xx governor)
Eric
> From: w...@jentronics.com
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 12:12:23 -0700
> CC: jsbsim-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSi
Gentlemen,
I have been looking at the atmosperic system of flightgear and altitude
and airspeed calcs in particular. I have been checking it for
correctness and later looked a bit in the code.
I must admit that I am not quite clear on how it works, particular the
interaction between FDM and th
I fully agree with Jacob. I thought that is why we have seperate
Terrain/Object/Airport folders in the first place...
Eric
On 03/17/2012 11:15 PM, Jacob Burbach wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
>
>> Anders Gidenstam wrote:
>>
>>
>>> While the (old) new beh
Hi Curt
Well actually there are quite some RL aircraft having a so-called
rudder-aileron interconnect. Of course in these aircraft it acts both
ways: A spring (so not hard linked 1:1) pulls the rudder at aileron
deflection and vice versa. The reason is however a very different one
namely a la
From: martin.sp...@mgras.net
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:46:25 +
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Double Input Resolution?
>
> Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
> > Agreed, but the as you are saying, the brake is hydraulic and
> > therefore there will always be a valve that traps
ng
bigger then a six-seat single turboprop.
Cheers,
Eric
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> From: martin.sp...@mgras.net
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:22:38 +
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Double Input Resolution?
>
> Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
> >
How a parking brake on small aircraft works:
There is a hydraulic line between the brake cylinders at the pedals ('toe
brakes'). The hydraulic pressure pushes pistons in the brake saddle (aircraft
fixed) against the brake disk on the wheels.
In this line there is a valve that can block this line
Hi Adrian,
Would go with 1. As you say signal strength does not have a major
influence on the functionality itself. It works or you have a flag. Only
of the very border of reception the respective indicator will wander
out. But that also is a signal strength issue and can be modelled
according
Just created a merge request #130 for fgdata.
Eric
On 01/10/2012 06:23 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
>> Is indeed JSBSIM and that did the trick. Engine running!
>>
> Great. Will you be committing a fix to f
On 01/10/2012 05:43 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
>> On current Git the Mig-15 engine cannot be started. I routed the problem
>> to a missing "/engines/engine[]/out-of-fuel" property that is there on 2.4.
On current Git the Mig-15 engine cannot be started. I routed the problem
to a missing "/engines/engine[]/out-of-fuel" property that is there on 2.4.
Checking revealed this is the same for the c172p (not sure with what
effect), but not for the A-10 or B1900D for instance.
Thanks,
Eric
Thorsten,
I am not sure who the mig-15 maintainer (same as Vostok-1 problem?) is,
but I think there will be a problem with this aircraft without stereo.
The ADF produces a left/right audio signal to indicate the NDB
direction. It looks like this is done by mixing two stereo files, one
with a l
Op 02-01-12 09:37, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi schreef:
From a general flight dynamics standpoint: all issues point to a too
low weight (including the breaking).
Cheers,
Eric
> Continuing the list:
>
> DG-101G:
>
> I tried to do some soaring in the DG-101G. There seems to be something
> wrong wit
>> Another big influence is the antenna pattern of the antenna on the
>> aircraft. Fuselage, wing and empennage are the blocking structures of
>> course. If you want I can have a look and get you some "typical" data
>> for "structure blocked signal loss".
>>
>> A lot of aircraft have a seperate GS
On 11/28/2011 06:14 PM, Adrian Musceac wrote:
> On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
>> For GA (what I have handy right now):
>> The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm
>> Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS:
For GA (what I have handy right now):
The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm
Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV
www.repeater-builder.com/measuring-*sensitivity*/*dbm*2uv.pdf
/for conversion table!/
The Avidyne is TSO minimums if I remember correctly. Their uni
On 11/06/2011 11:43 AM, James Turner wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2011, at 09:43, Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
>
>> So we now have a Terragear version that produces nice and more detailed
>> terrain, but can only be seen with current GIT flightgear. As the
>> fraction of people
On 11/05/2011 12:47 PM, Erik Hofman wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 13:23 +0100, Eric van den Berg wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am currently making some Terrain around ELLX using SRMT4 and CORINE
>> data. For that I used a current (approx. two weeks old)
Hello everyone,
I am currently making some Terrain around ELLX using SRMT4 and CORINE
data. For that I used a current (approx. two weeks old) terragear
version, compiled against PLIB, OSG ans SIMGEAR of the same age.
The Terrain generated works fine with current FG GIT, but gives errors
with b
24 matches
Mail list logo
