I got the .diff from Maik Justus.
I merged it into the _Sport Model_.
It works fine; ATIS and marker beacons are no longer Doppler
shifted.
In addition to the two files patched by the .diff, I had
to make some trivial and obvious edits in two other files,
to bring them into compliance with the
Hi,
ups. Is it really July? Please replace June by July in my last post.
Thanks to John.
Maik
Maik Justus schrieb am 06.07.2007 21:23:
> Hi John,
>
> I posted the patch which should fix your problem on June 1st, 22:16
> (German time).
> (If you do not have archived this EMail: just drop me a n
Hi John,
I posted the patch which should fix your problem on June 1st, 22:16
(German time).
(If you do not have archived this EMail: just drop me a note, I will
email it to you).
I think the patch will be commited soon. But I am modifying files, which
are not mine, therefore it is ok, to give
On Friday 06 July 2007 18:27, John Denker wrote:
> It's been ten days now with no CVS-commit nor even any
> discussion of a CVS-commit AFAICT.
That's probably about right. I and a few others on IRC were testing various
patches for Maik for a while... I thought that the results of that made it to
On 07/06/2007 02:56 PM, Thomas Förster wrote:
> Hmm, rereading your post this probably was a misunderstanding. You were
> referring to doppler effect related commits, weren't you?
Yes. Perhaps I clipped too much context; I thought
the Subject: line would be sufficient contex. Sorry.
To rep
Am Freitag 06 Juli 2007 20:33 schrieb John Denker:
> On 07/06/2007 01:50 PM, Thomas Förster wrote:
> > That's definitely not true (generally spoken). Which branch are you
> > using?
>
> CVS OSG, up to date as of late yesterday (the 5th).
> Has something happened since then?
Hmm, rereading your pos
On 07/06/2007 01:50 PM, Thomas Förster wrote:
> That's definitely not true (generally spoken). Which branch are you using?
CVS OSG, up to date as of late yesterday (the 5th).
Has something happened since then?
With this version I observe:
-- Middle marker audio is strongly shifted.
-- ATIS
Am Freitag 06 Juli 2007 19:27 schrieb John Denker:
> It's been ten days now with no CVS-commit nor even any
> discussion of a CVS-commit AFAICT.
That's definitely not true (generally spoken). Which branch are you using?
Thomas
--
PhD Student, Dept. Animal Physiology, HU Berlin
Tel +49 30 2093 61
On 07/06/2007 01:08 PM, AJ MacLeod wrote:
> These bugs actually have been worked out already.
Excellent!
> The necessary fixes have
> been made and with Maik's last patch (which was posted to the dev list, I'm
> pretty sure) I'm not aware of any significant problems. Maybe you could try
>
On Friday 06 July 2007 18:03, John Denker wrote:
> 1) Where I'm coming from: Different people are interested in different
> parts of FlightGear. I consider it a strength of the project that it
> can be put to disparate purposes.
I'm sure we all agree about that, anyway.
> 1a) As for me pe
1) Where I'm coming from: Different people are interested in different
parts of FlightGear. I consider it a strength of the project that it
can be put to disparate purposes.
1a) As for me personally, and for more than a few others, there is
interest in using it as a complex-aircraft pro
Hello Martin,
just didn't got the point of my posting.
Maik
Martin Spott schrieb am 27.06.2007 01:14:
> Maik Justus wrote:
>
>
>> [...] But I only will start to work
>> on that patch if there is a chance to get it into cvs. Therefore I will
>> wait, if the "windows" patch will be accepted.
* Maik Justus -- Wednesday 27 June 2007:
> This patch has some debug code and is not intended to go into cvs.
OK, thanks. I'll apply here and test if it doesn't break sound
on Linux. MS Windows users, please test if it fixes the Doppler
bug for you. Choose a nice aircraft, take off, switch to Fly-
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:14:08 + (UTC)
Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maik Justus wrote:
>
> > [...] But I only will start to work
> > on that patch if there is a chance to get it into cvs. Therefore I will
> > wait, if the "windows" patch will be accepted.
>
> The original author
Maik Justus wrote:
> [...] But I only will start to work
> on that patch if there is a chance to get it into cvs. Therefore I will
> wait, if the "windows" patch will be accepted.
The original author of the OpenAL publicly objects implementing things
in FlightGear that OpenAL usually should tak
Hi Jon,
thanks for pointing that out. And thanks to you and AJ for the debugging
on IRC.
Here is a patch (the same you already got via EMail (ok, one debug
message is different)), which could fix it. If the bug is still present,
please comment out line 56 (#define USE_OPEN_AL_DOPPLER should wo
With a cvs build checked out about half an hour ago I've just noticed
something very strange - with external views the doppler shift appears
to be related to the view angle rather than the approach speed. If you
select the chase view then you'll find that the sound is extremely slow
from behind
17 matches
Mail list logo
