Hi geneb, all,
De : geneb ge...@deltasoft.com
Envoyé le : Jeudi 28 février 2013 15h41
It's a best foot forward kind of thing. The quintessential default
airplane in MSFS has been the 172. The default set of airplanes in FG
should be the absolute best of
Hi Vivian,
That's really good to hear - but if we are falling behind in some
respect
then we will make an effort to improve. I am reminded that the flag and
wake shaders are inoperative when Atmospheric Light Scattering is activated.
With the departure of Emilian, I see no prospect
Thorsten aka Renk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi]
Sent: 28 February 2013 07:57
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG vs. FSX demo
Renk, you should take a look at the default Cessna 172 in FG and it's
mate in FSX
Hi Thorsten, :)
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Renk Thorsten wrote:
My problem is that I often know very well how X is implemented in FG, I may
suspect that it's not in FSX or X-Plane, but since I'm not running X-Plane or
FSX with all addons I don't really know for a fact if it is a
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Renk Thorsten wrote:
Renk, you should take a look at the default Cessna 172 in FG and it's
mate in FSX. The FSX version wipes the floor with the FG version with
respect
to the cockpit model.
(I'd really appreciate if you guys would call me on first-name basis
Stefan Seifert wrote:
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 07:42:19 Renk Thorsten wrote:
* A big plus about the FSX terrain is that it doesn't have landclass
seams.
That makes it quite a bit nicer to look at from above. It's not so
impressive from close-up, and all in all, I would conclude that
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 09:10:01 Vivian Meazza wrote:
Linear features for the scenery (roads, railways, rivers) are already under
development for FG:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/57645542/fgfs-screen-129.png
That is a small area of Kent, UK. It is very possible to use the accurately
Cool review Renk!
Regarding FDMs: I was at a friend's this christmas and since he had just bought
X-Plane 10, I had the chance to test it with C172 to see how it handles...
FG clearly wins here since on X-plane there was not even a slight 'adverse yaw'
(aileron-breaking) attitude when turning
A small addition: what has always bothered me about terrain in FG is that
roads and rivers are all the same size.
Good point. That wasn't really apparent from the FSX demo (not so many roads of
different size in the Caribbean).
I think rivers are less of an issue in CORINE based custom
Renk Thorsten wrote:
... snip
* Models of trees and of the aircraft carrier in the vicinity where
largely on
par. Probably FSX has more graphical artists and the quality of for
instance
tree textures seems to be a bit better, but the technique is otherwise
pretty
similar. I liked seeing a
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Renk Thorsten wrote:
Following a forum discussion, I finally became curious and tested the
FSX demo version yesterday. I've spent about two hours flight with it,
testing 3 different planes (the ultralight, the Baron and the Learjet)
and had a look at different weather
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Stefan Seifert wrote:
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 07:42:19 Renk Thorsten wrote:
* A big plus about the FSX terrain is that it doesn't have landclass seams.
Is this why there's such a hard edge on the coastlines?
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
I wrote:
Renk Thorsten wrote:
... snip
* Models of trees and of the aircraft carrier in the vicinity where
largely on
par. Probably FSX has more graphical artists and the quality of for
instance
tree textures seems to be a bit better, but the technique is otherwise
pretty
Renk, you should take a look at the default Cessna 172 in FG and it's
mate in FSX. The FSX version wipes the floor with the FG version with respect
to the cockpit model.
(I'd really appreciate if you guys would call me on first-name basis
'Thorsten'...)
That's a question of what a fair
Following a forum discussion, I finally became curious and tested the FSX demo
version yesterday. I've spent about two hours flight with it, testing 3
different planes (the ultralight, the Baron and the Learjet) and had a look at
different weather conditions and daytimes around TNCM.
The
15 matches
Mail list logo
