Re: [Flightgear-devel] Musings on FG on Linux/Windows
Hi Curt
Maybe these are two types of conferences now. One could be the WIFGH, the
Weekly International FlightGear Hangout ;-) Or monthly ?
Another option I see now is probably a smaller european conference when I read
about this idea at the forum
Hi Curt
Maybe these are two types of conferences now. One could be the WIFGH, the
Weekly International FlightGear Hangout ;-) Or monthly ?
Another option I see now is probably a smaller european conference when I read
about this idea at the forums. Maybe spring or summer 2013 is a possible
sch
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:47:06 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Hans Janssen
> wrote:
>
> > On 12/02/2012 02:35 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> > > and as far as I know, there isn't an upper
> > > limit to the number of participants in a hangout.
> >
> > The limit is 10
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:53:03 +0100
Hans Janssen wrote:
> On 12/02/2012 02:35 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> > and as far as I know, there isn't an upper
> > limit to the number of participants in a hangout.
>
> The limit is 10 according to this.
> https://support.google.com/plus/bin/answer.py?hl=en&
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Hans Janssen wrote:
> On 12/02/2012 02:35 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> > and as far as I know, there isn't an upper
> > limit to the number of participants in a hangout.
>
> The limit is 10 according to this.
> https://support.google.com/plus/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answe
On 12/02/2012 02:35 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> and as far as I know, there isn't an upper
> limit to the number of participants in a hangout.
The limit is 10 according to this.
https://support.google.com/plus/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1216374
Hans.
0x4FD802C3.asc
Description: application/pgp-k
The FS Weekend event has been the closest thing to a developer conference
that we've had over the past few years.Our developers are dispersed
across the world so any event would involve significant travel for most
people. For people with day jobs, young families, or tight budgets,
internationa
Hi Yves, all,
De : HB-GRAL
Envoyé le : Dimanche 2 décembre 2012 12h12
> My dream: FlightGear should held a developer meeting once next year.
> This would be my all time favourite. Have there been such meetings once?
At least there were thoughts about doing a
Am 01.12.12 14:15, schrieb Pat:
> Does this ring any bells?
>
> http://unprotocols.org/blog:14
>
Hi Pat
This link .. exactly. That’s probably all what I was thinking about when
I sent my thanks to the list for Thorsten (for ALL t(h)orstens at the
end, anyway for all contributors, leaders, non-l
Please let me be very clear about a few things.
This is not about lack of praise or thanks - I'm doing weather and light mainly
because I like doing it, because I like to see if I can capture the essence of
a scene I see in real life in shader code. I am passionate and excited about
that, and
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Pat wrote:
> My thanks to everybody who's ever comitted anything without getting
> paid money for it.
>
> Thank you.
>
> For responding to my posts on the mailing lists.
> And for talking with me on irc.
> Thanks for Flightgear.
> It's a great hobby.
>
> I apprecia
Does this ring any bells?
http://unprotocols.org/blog:14
--
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas?
Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep
My thanks to everybody who's ever comitted anything without getting
paid money for it.
Thank you.
For responding to my posts on the mailing lists.
And for talking with me on irc.
Thanks for Flightgear.
It's a great hobby.
I appreciate it and all of you.
-Pat
--
> Problem is, there are no project leaders. And that worked remarkably
> well for quite a while. I think everyone involved in FlighGear is busy
> working on other things right now. I know I am, and for a good reason; I
> learned the hard way FlighGear isn't going to pay my bill so I spent all
> of
On 12/01/2012 02:04 AM, HB-GRAL wrote:
> Am 29.11.12 08:59, schrieb Renk Thorsten:
>
>> So, good to know that you apparently see me as someone who has nothing
>> better to do than complain because the service isn't good. You know what -
>> I'm out of here for a really good long break, doing somet
Am 29.11.12 08:59, schrieb Renk Thorsten:
> So, good to know that you apparently see me as someone who has nothing better
> to do than complain because the service isn't good. You know what - I'm out
> of here for a really good long break, doing something nice. The FG experience
> for me of lat
Flightgear-devel] Musings on FG on Linux/Windows
> To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
>
> Date: Thursday, November 29, 2012, 8:59 AM
> Me asking a genuine question:
>
> > Why do I need to make a song and dance to get the last
> stable under
> >
Me asking a genuine question:
> Why do I need to make a song and dance to get the last stable under
> Linux when it works no fuss under Windows? Are we genuinely unable to
> provide a working generic 32 and a 64bit set of binaryies for Linux? I
> know that lib paths and versions are differen
Thorsten,
Thanks. Your response was cleared up a lot.
I had been wondering how the personal relationships between the
flightgear project and the distributions actually worked. I was also
wondering if the process of getting flightgear into distributions was
broken and needed fixing or not. If I
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:03:55 +0100, ThorstenB wrote in message
<50b68a4b.7050...@gmail.com>:
> * Debian (2.6.0 (not 2.8.0!) accepted into "stable" on October 30th)
> http://packages.debian.org/de/sid/flightgear
..while I agree Debian Sid is stable enough for most people here,
Debian policy defin
Am 28.11.2012 20:12, schrieb Stefan Seifert:
> A good first step would be to contact the maintainer of the FlightGear package
> in the games repository and ask why build is disabled for all non-openSUSE
> distributions.
Well, that would be me ;-), and since you have already asked:
The cross-platf
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 18:05:53 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > Is there a way to manage packaging across distros?
>
> ..not _a_, but _many_ ways. Debian probably has the best
> (and biggest) pile of tools to do this, I have this vision
> of somebody running this virtual build-n-test cluster off
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:51:57 -0500, Pat wrote in message
<20121127215157.0f27252b@spinnaker>:
> For me the question is not so much how to get there, but where do we
> want to go and who's going to make the effort.
..that will be decided meritocratically by whoever codes
something that's more th
For me the question is not so much how to get there, but where do we
want to go and who's going to make the effort.
>From reading this thread and others, a lot of work done on
managing the release process. Is there still some work to do in the
area of builds for various audiences?
Which distros
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:39:42 +, Renk wrote in message
:
> > No it doesn't. There's nothing preventing us from providing
> > packages for older distribution versions.
>
> This sounds very neat, and if this works in practice, then I take my
> comment back - being able to get an rpm for any maj
> No it doesn't. There's nothing preventing us from providing packages for
> older
> distribution versions.
This sounds very neat, and if this works in practice, then I take my comment
back - being able to get an rpm for any major Linux distribution would be
equivalent to the Windows installer
On 27 Nov 2012, at 08:01, Stefan Seifert wrote:
>> That basically seems to require that everyone who wants most recent FG needs
>> to update to most recent Linux.
>
> No it doesn't. There's nothing preventing us from providing packages for
> older
> distribution versions. On the openSUSE Buil
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 07:56:02 Renk Thorsten wrote:
> > Binary releases on Linux are /possible/ but a pain - working with each
> > distro's packaging system is definitely the way to go, in my opinion.
> That basically seems to require that everyone who wants most recent FG needs
> to update t
> Binary releases on Linux are /possible/ but a pain - working with each
> distro's packaging system is definitely the way to go, in my opinion.
That basically seems to require that everyone who wants most recent FG needs to
update to most recent Linux. Which is something which according to my
Personally I've moved to Ubuntu 10.04 as I couldn't get my
soundcard working anymore on Suse ca. back in 2009.
I've never looked back and probably never ever use again Suse...
--- On Mon, 11/26/12, Renk Thorsten wrote:
> From: Renk Thorsten
> Subject: [Flightgear-de
On 26 Nov 2012, at 09:59, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> The nice thing is: the openSUSE Build Service is not limited to openSUSE.
> Packages can be created for Debian, Fedora, Mandriva and Ubuntu as well. And
> once you got that set up, it's very little work to maintain.
>
> I think this could be a
On Monday 26 November 2012 09:45:51 Renk Thorsten wrote:
> I am genuinely at a loss here. A normal Linux user has practically no change
> to get last stable on his box running if it isn't in his distro - a normal
> Windows user gets everything nice and streamlined.
>
> Does anyone else understand
So, I finally broke down over the weekend, getting so frustrated with a the GPU
not powering up under Linux that I installed FG on Windows.
If I want to get FG last stable under Fedora 17, I have to compile it myself,
only 2.6 is on the repo. The process is probably similar to compiling current
33 matches
Mail list logo