SVG Font Issue between FOP-0.94 and FOP-1.0

Hi all, I'm new to the list so please be kind ;) I'm currently investigating an issue in our documentation tool chain based on DITA OT and FOP. The current FOP version used is FOP-0.94 in combination with batik-all-1.7 and xmlgraphics-commons-1.4. With this combination of versions everything is

Re: Difference between fop 1.0 and trunk in font-base URL

Hi Alexios, On 03/05/12 17:23, Alexios Giotis wrote: Hi, I noticed a difference to the way the font-base works in FOP configuration file, when I upgrade from 1.0 to trunk. In 1.0, relative paths (for example font-basesrc/test/data/fonts/font-base) are resolved against the current

Re: Difference between fop 1.0 and trunk in font-base URL

Helpful and in depth answer, Thanks Vincent On May 4, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Alexios, On 03/05/12 17:23, Alexios Giotis wrote: Hi, I noticed a difference to the way the font-base works in FOP configuration file, when I upgrade from 1.0 to trunk. In 1.0,

Re: SVG Font Issue between FOP-0.94 and FOP-1.0

Hi Karsten, Since you waited so long this is not a pressing issue, I suggest to download a nightly build snapshot of the current trunk [1] and check if this is fixed. In the next few months, there will be a new FOP release. If this is not already fixed, then a minimal input XSL:FO (in addition