nvironment (IcedTea 2.4.1) (suse-8.18.1-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b50, mixed mode)
So, removing these three libraries drastically improved performance for us.
Can someone explain why this is so? Can I safely drop these jars?
Best regards
Peter
--
View this message in cont
he first place,
> but that horse left the gate long ago.
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Peter <
> p.kullmann@
> > wrote:
>
>> We had some performance problems with fop and began to investigate. For a
>> specific example document of about 400 pages fo
ne shipped with fop was the same.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/Drastic-Performance-Improvement-by-dropping-xerces-and-xalan-tp40586p40651.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at
use these files for generation of one or more PDF
files?
Extensions:
- How to tell FOP, which files to collect into one distinct PDF document?
Kind regards
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr
look like:
fop
???
xml/name.xml
resources/name2fo.xsl
pdf
name.pdf
This is just an idea - not the real code, because I'm asking for that! ;-)
Kind regards
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop
Hi,
tried it using "maven-antrun-plugin".
[cannot post the xml because a problem with gmane web interface :-( ]
The "outfile" parameter is ignored - is this a restriction of "fop" or the
plugin?
Regards
Peter
--
gt;
> Would anyone have any idea on how to move forward in order to get this
> solved?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [
would be greatly appreciated,
Thanks,
Peter
feature, and/or would it make sense to add some kind of option to either enable
or disable this part of the code?
Thanks,
Peter
From: Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 5 september 2006
11:54
To: 'fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org'
Subject: Png output and
t
Gentlepeople,
I am considering entering this in bugzilla.
Just to make sure: would that be “the
correct” approach?
Thanks,
Peter
From: Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 5 september 2006
14:58
To: 'fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org'
Subjec
this "line-leading" area (the
approach above seems not very elegant)?
2) Is the suggestion made on the XEP list wrong and/or is there a problem in
FOP and/or is this one of the implementation dependant areas of FO?
Any guidance, as always, extremely appreciated.
Than
Sorry for the late reply (was ooo).
But...it works great and this really helps a lot.
Thanks!
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 10 september 2006 18:45
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Png output and transparent
that).
When I do the exact same thing but use batik to include the
image it looks just fine.
Anyone any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Peter
PS Here is an example
<fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
<fo:layout-master-set>
An often used "trick" one finds in mailing lists (e.g.
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200306/msg00445.html) is to
use
Hth,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Mansour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 22 september 2006 10:00
To:
The template stylesheet I am using which does the trick for me is
Perhaps that works for you?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Mansour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 22 september 2006 10:24
To: fop-users
> You mean the image from the external-graphic is lighter than the one
> painted through SVG/Batik when you render the attached FO file to PNG
> instead of PDF?
That is indeed what I refer to
> This has something to do with color management which is something I've
> only started to understand.
> Can someone reproduce?
Works on Windows XP (using fop trunk) and Java 1.5
> -Original Message-
> From: Johannes Küpnsebeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 4:15 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: OutOfMemoryError with "Hello World" and multicol
ulticolumn
>
> Oh, sorry, I posted the wrong file. Column-count must be 3 for the error
> to appear.
>
>
> Peter schrieb:
> >> Can someone reproduce?
> >>
> > Works on Windows XP (using fop trunk) and Java 1.5
> >
> >
> >> -
same font information.
...
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Mansour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:59 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: PNG renderer - does fop supporting fonts
>
> Hey
>
> In my c
>
> Le 3 nov. 06 à 13:02, Peter a écrit :
>
> > Olivier,
> >
> > You have to use system fonts with the png renderer
>
> do you know how to add your own ttf fonts on Debian ?
>
I am afraid I can not be of any help here.
> > Olivier,
> >
> > You have to use system fonts with the png renderer
> >
>
> regarding to http://www.mail-archive.com/fop-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04834.html do I have to use fop-trunk ?
>
> > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.92/output.html#general-fonts
> >
I had to yes. I guess you would
e code change which I implemented locally
and which works fine for me
(http://www.nabble.com/Quality-of-included-image-degrades-when-png-rendering
-is-used-t2312286.html).
I think the idea is still to eventually deal with this within fop.
Peter
metrics generations did not complain
Both trunk (relative old one) and 0.92 beta show the behavior on Windows XP
and Java 1.5
Thanks,
Peter
-
FO file is
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";
xmlns:ltml="http://www.lum
Thanks for the reply,
I started from a Type1 font for which, I have the impression, the -enc ansi
option is not supported/relevant.
Attached the metrics file.
All guidance where to look is appreciated,
Thanks,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
."
A document is however opened which does contain "a" barcode.
Note that I am not necessarily in a big hurry, so if you say "I'm sure it
can be made to work with some coding but right now" is there anything I can
do to actually make it work?
Thanks,
Peter
> -Or
I found the TrueType versions of the 2 barcode fonts I was using and those
work just fine.
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:42 AM
> To: 'fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: NPE
that I have the impression that
other xsl-fo processors do support such a feature.
Thanks,
Peter
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:37 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Use PDF as input source for FOP
Sure. I will reply in private. (I am not sure I could quote from what I read
in public without violating the license agreement I accepted when
downloading the demo of the product)
Peter
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 1:56 PM
To
:-))
to change a number of parameters (like font size etc) to try and make the
text fit in the available region.
Would this (or could this made to) match with xsl-fo/fop?
All considerations appreciated!
Peter
<>--
with).
I might not have the time to implement it and I understand it would probably
not make it in the main line code (being non standard) but asking never
hurts I guess.
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas L Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 02
> In any case if you generate PDF you should specify measurements
> in mm, pt or in.
Oops...sorry for the extra noise, thanks, Peter.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
amount of
issues and competing interests involved.
But the problem of converting 'something' to both html and pdf is certainly
common enough.
To a certain extent things like http://www.re.be/css2xslfo/ seem to want to
address that.
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From
When working on the patch I certainly can not remember coming anywhere close
to code that could have an influence on how png's get into the pdf.
I will take a look at it (unless Jermias beats me at it) this week
(hopefully tomorrow)
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas
steps, fop has examples to achieve this in
one step. Take e.g. a look at ExampleXML2PDF.java.
Hope this helps,
Peter
_
From: Sam Hwang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 10:02 AM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: FOP generation error
Perhaps the setFontBaseURL method in FopFactory does what you want ?
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk Bromberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:34 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: own URIResolver for ttf fonts?
>
the uri starts with data:.
Perhaps a version difference?
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk Bromberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:32 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: own URIResolver for ttf fonts?
>
>
) binary comparison with a master file impossible.
I guess I could check the fop input iso the fop output, but I'd rather check
the actual pdf if possible.
How this is typically solved?
Thanks,
Peter
Thanks (for the pointer) Jeremias. For now I have added a bit of regexp
mumbo jumbo in the compare code to get rid of the variable sections in the
pdf file. Not very elegant but it works, can be automated and will in the
worst case scenario only give rise to false negatives I think.
Peter
-container object, but I
would rather not use this if not needed.
Thanks,
Peter
MasterException: state: rest
filled even
)
(static-content [1])))
(generate [output-format pdf][1]))
And a single page pdf
All suggestions or guidance warmly welcomed!
Thanks,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicol Bolas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday
Thanks for all the help. block-container it will be then.
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:42 AM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: XSL FO newbie question - Hide overfl
> How about doing the whole thing in SVG?
Problem is that I then loose the text formatting features fo offers. I am
assuming that outputting fo(p) input to svg output is not anywhere near
"production" quality, but I am not sure that assumptions is true.
> There's one hack you can try (0.93 or la
P and Batik use the same URIResolver
interface?
Any type of guidance or pointer appreciated!
Thanks,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Coppens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 5:56 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject:
Thanks Jeremias. Appreciate you take the time to help out.
> > Is that the (only) way to tell to Batik to do something user specific
> when
> > resolving relative URI's?
>
> This is the wrong place to ask this question.
I guess the question should have been "is there anyway I can tell fop to
tel
> I imagine in the longer term the basic URI resolution should maybe go in
> Batik with a specialisation of this class in FOP. What does everybody
> else think?
Having started this discussion I guess it is no more than polite to at least
reply with something. Unfortunately I don't have much to sa
decided to come up with something like
class MyResolver extends
ParsedURLDefaultProtocolHandler
implements URIResolver {
...
}
I know, they don't come much uglier, but at least it keeps the mess isolated
and allows me to move forward.
Thanks for your help a
XML Commons Resolver to make use of
XCatalogs. Example:
fopFactory.setURIResolver(myResolver); // myResolver is a
javax. xml.transform.URIResolver
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Venkat Gurukrishna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 200
In this context you might find http://www.re.be/css2xslfo/ relevant as well.
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal Sancho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 9:27 AM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: RE: xsl fo block tempate mat
It seems I found the answer at
http://www.antennahouse.com/support/qa/QA/2005052701.html
Setting font-size='0' line-height='0' on the block containing the
external-graphics solves it
Apologies for the noise,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Pe
Taking a quick look I wonder whether it is not related to the empt url in
When I "fix" that I see another error which seems to indicate something is
wrong with fo file.
Hth,
Peter
_
From: Jeff Powanda [mailto:[EMAIL
> Can one specify a custom resolver (delivering some InputStream) for FOP?
Yes, one can do that. E.g. using
FOUserAgent#setURIResolver(URIResolver resolver)
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would actually do something useful.
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94---API-access-to-font-directory-tf4720666.html#a13495749
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
avoiding the hassle of the measurement files.
I hope you see what I am trying to do
Thanks for you help,
Peter
Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I'm not quite sure why this feature would be useful, maybe it would be
> helpful if you could explain your requirement
()));
Seems to work ok, but does feel a bit like (unnecessary) mumbo jumbo.
Perhaps a more elegant approach is available?
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94---API-access-to-font-directory-tf4720666.html#a13505723
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive
the thing to use but apparently that
is not working.
Am I missing something? Is this intended behaviour or is this an
(un)documented feature?
Many thanks indeed for any pointers or considerations,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94---%3Cdirectory%3E-config-el
Thanks! Peter.
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> I've stumbled over that myself a few days ago. I've got a fix
> (registering both "GillSansMT" and "Gill Sans MT"). I'll see to it that
> I can upload this change in the next two days.
>
> Je
With fop 0.94 that however does not
seem to work anymore.
Suggestions warmly welcomed!
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94---png-renderer---transparent-page-background-broken--tf4760086.html#a13612965
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list arc
Thanks Jeremiaswe are up for a release soon...how safe do you anticipate
it to be to use 'the latest' trunk version iso the 'official' 0.94 build?
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94---png-renderer---transparent-page-backgrou
Anyone any suggestions? They would be most warmly welcomed!
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fop-0.94-instream-svg-object-regression--tf4763837.html#a13624715
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Apologies...I did not post the image file
http://www.nabble.com/file/p13624990/ti_1.png ti_1.png
Peter
Peter Coppens wrote:
>
> Gentlepeople,
>
> The attached fo renders to pdf with 0.93 but gives a broken image with
> 0.94
>
> - fo : http://www.nabble.com/file/p136
Thanks Jeremias...back to the triplets it is I guess...as I have to deal with
type 1 and truetype fonts.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fop-0.94%2C-png-renderer-and-font-tf4765491.html#a13633998
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
d the XMLGraphics font's page but unless I overlooked, that info is not
there.
Is there some information on font naming somewhere available?
Does anyone have any guidance on how to use the same fo input for both pdf
and png renderer without bumping ones head against the font hell?
Thanks!
Peter
--
Olala
Putting single quotes around the font name does not make a difference.
Anyone any guidance?
Many thanks indeed!
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fop-0.94%2C-png-renderer-and-font-tf4765491.html#a13629650
Sent from the FOP - Users mailin
StrangeI tried different jdk's (on Windows) , using
fop -fo test.fo -pdf test.pdf
always the same "broken image" result.
Any idea what else could be different that is of importance in this context?
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabb
Thanks Jeremias
URL looks ok...also tested with relative uri's with the same result. And the
same test copied in a 0.93 directory seem to work fine.
I'll dive into the debugger somewhere in the coming hours/days and will post
back with my findings.
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this
Would anyone have any pointers to information that would help me to get
started. I am sure it's in the fo spec, but i have not enough time to try
and get my brain around that document (assuming I would ever succeed).
Many thanks indeed!
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabb
Thanks Jeremias.
This is exactly the type of information I was looking for.
I will try to work out a few examples of my own the coming days to make sure
I understand what is going on.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fop-layout-question-tf4815030.html#a13790353
Hello.
I have a quick follow up question - in case the fo does not specify the
line-height, what would be the default?
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fop-layout-question-tf4815030.html#a13910009
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at
Thanks, Peter.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fop-layout-question-tf4815030.html#a13910300
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
what fonts to specify in the PDF.
Help please
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warren Young wrote:
Peter Sparkes wrote:
However, I do not know what the fonts are called so that I can tell
FOP what fonts to specify in the PDF.
Have you tried just using the Unicode characters in question and
seeing what happens?
I have no experience with Asian character sets, but I
Thanks you all for your help and advice.
Following Jeremias' suggestion:
Can someone who has used Chinese fonts with FOP, please, advice me what
fonts they have used for both traditional and simplified Chinese
Thanks
Peter
On 30.01.2008 01:01:22 Manuel Mall wrote:
-Original Me
Thanks Stefan,
I have found the "uming.ttf" files and downloaded them.
Peter
Peter Sparkes schrieb:
Thanks you all for your help and advice.
Following Jeremias' suggestion:
Can someone who has used Chinese fonts with FOP, please, advice me
what fonts they hav
fonts\apps\TTFReader.class
Help please - what's going wrong
Thanks
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you Jeremias & Stefan,
It was a typo in the path which I had not found. However, I will
certainly use the tag
Peter
That simply means that there's probably a mistake setting up the
classpath.
Anyway, you're on 0.94, so just skip generating the font metrics file.
Instea
I am using uming, however, the font is called ARPLShanHeiSunUni. All I
do is
font-family="ARPLShanHeiSunUni" font-weight="normal" text-align="left">
and everything works fine
Peter
element is indeed embedded inside element.
Not sure why it is gett
with embedded Chinese characters
Hope this helps
Peter
It is not working in my case. Can you please tell me the corresponding
mapping ARPLShanHeiSunUni font defined in your FOP configuration file.
Peter Sparkes wrote:
I am using uming, however, the font is called ARPLShanHeiSunUni. All
I do
LShanHeiSunUni" font-weight="normal" text-align="left">
5. Ran it from the following command line
java -jar C:/fop-094/build/fop.jar -c C:/fop-fonts/config.xml -fo
C:/Data/chinese.fo -pdf C:/Data/Chinese.pdf
This produced a pdf with embedded Chinese characters
Hope
on (and verification) features could be
part of such workbench...so I would be interested in that part
Perhaps it helps,
Peter
On 12 Mar 2008, at 13:01, Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Even though FOP configuration is quite well documented (http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/configuration.html
), I think
For pdf, checkout http://www.jeremias-maerki.ch/development/fop/index.html
For eps, you probably get "expected" behavior (but I am not sure) -
see http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/graphics.html#eps
Hth,
Peter
On 07 Apr 2008, at 13:00, Oliver Hirschi wrote:
Hi there again
thoughts?
Tx!
Peter
FO fragment
nybody any luck
getting the 0.95beta fop/batik to work on macos when using tif
images? It is unclear from my intial www wanderings what the state of
jai on mac os is.
Pointers or guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Peter
org.apache.xmlgraphics.image.loader.ImageException: Cannot
ndering of 'the' stylesheet with 0.94 it takes
about 7 seconds. With 0.95beta it takes 328 seconds
I could try to isolate the 'performance' bottleneck...but perhaps this
can be explained with the info available right now?
Thanks!
Peter
-
5. With the newely versions fop 0.95beta and fop-pdf-images-1.2-bin,
I can not ebbed TIFF graphics. There happens the exception (see
below *2) in fop. With fop 0.94, the same graphic could be embedded
well.
See reply of Jeremias in a previous thread
The solution here
is simple: Please ins
Now...for the more problematic part - I am on MacOS...anybody any
luck getting the 0.95beta fop/batik to work on macos when using
tif images? It is unclear from my intial www wanderings what the
state of jai on mac os is.
I've not really tested TIFF yet, but I do know that JAI is
definit
On 10 Apr 2008, at 20:47, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 20:09, Peter Coppens wrote:
Now...for the more problematic part - I am on MacOS...anybody any
luck getting the 0.95beta fop/batik to work on macos when using
tif images? It is unclear from my intial www wanderings what
On 10 Apr 2008, at 22:00, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 21:37, Peter Coppens wrote:
On 10 Apr 2008, at 20:47, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
Now, I've been looking deeper into my local setup, and IIC, then
for Java 1.5, the JAI libraries are already distributed /with/ the
in
installed after all (in /System/Library/Java/
Extensions...see other mail in this thread)
Cheers
Andreas
Thanks for taking the time...much appreciated!
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
of the jai
image io dependancy for tiff's...
Peter
Stylesheet
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";
xmlns:rx="http://www.renderx.com/XSL/Extensions";
xmlns:doc="for internal documentation"
me to dive into image
formats at this moment, I am afraid I would not even know with which
tiff parameters to play
Perhaps there is some part of the fop/batik tests that could be used
to do some performance regression measurements?
Thanks again for your support!
Peter
On 10 Apr 2008
On 11 Apr 2008, at 17:48, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 07:18, Peter Coppens wrote:
Tried 2 more tiffs (but from the same 'source'). They gave the
similar results for relative performance. 1 (0.94) vs 30 (0.95beta)
vs 6(0.95beta-jeremias-tiff)
Given my no
although the fact that 0.94 is faster than 0.95beta-jeremias-tiff
would make that weird.
Not really. It would be much weirder IMO if FOP (or any software for
that matter) were to offer increased flexibility/functionality/
features without any performance penalty whatsoever. If that wer
ciate the
time you spent on this)
Peter
Well...for me
On 11 Apr 2008, at 22:59, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 19:26, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 18:20, Peter Coppens wrote:
Well, did a very quick test here, and without Jeremias' change, any
TIFF th
On 12 Apr 2008, at 13:09, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 23:30, Peter Coppens wrote:
Hi Peter
I don't like the jai dependancy (don't like native Java libraries)
Very rightly so. As demonstrated by this particular case, if one
platform lacks native support, it
fix/
patch on your xp box as well?
Thanks,
Peter
On 13 Apr 2008, at 10:02, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Peter sent me one of his large TIFF images to test with. Thanks,
Peter.
I used his FO snippet he posted at the beginning of the thread so the
firgures below are including Batik into the picture
Pfff...sorry for the noise.
I'll double check my measurements on MacOS and will also try to
measure on Debian (where the app is in production). I can live with
the slowdown on Mac and so hopefully it does not show up on Debian
Thanks again!
Peter
On 13 Apr 2008, at 11:19, Jeremias M
Wrt to the imagepreloader not found, you might want to check
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/graphics.html
To summarize, you will need JAI Image I/O Tools for bmp to be
supported as an input format
Hth,
Peter
On 13 Apr 2008, at 00:07, morten wrote:
hi
I am trying to do a basic
Perhaps border properties could help you achieve what you want?
On 21 Apr 2008, at 15:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I insert a little graphic in an underlined text but it is not
underlined.
Text is underlined but not graphic.
I think it is normal because I find nothing in the
You might find http://www.nabble.com/Batik-and-SVG-into-layered-PDF-td16549533.html#a16549533
helpful
While it is about Batik I think the same holds for FOP.
Peter
On 21 Apr 2008, at 16:49, Oliver Hirschi wrote:
Hi there
Is there the possibility to generate different layers in the pdf
on of fop or post one of your images.
Hth,
Peter
On 22 Apr 2008, at 14:57, Jean-François El Fouly wrote:
I have a problem with the way PNG images are rendered.
I'm writing tools to manage aircraft technical documentations. One
of the documents is the "Pilot's Guide", it has
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo