s in the source. I'll give it a
few days then try it out ! :-)
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 21 September 2006 5:22 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Font names...
Hi Karl,
Karl Roberts a écrit :
> Hi Vincent,
Hi Karl,
Karl Roberts a écrit :
> Hi Vincent,
>
>>> This issue will soon disappear. The current font library will be
> replaced with another one (FOrayFont), which
>>> handles that completely differently.
>
> Do you know how soon the FOrayFont stuff will be in the trunk? I'm
Well, if everythin
Hi Vincent,
>> This issue will soon disappear. The current font library will be
replaced with another one (FOrayFont), which
>> handles that completely differently.
Do you know how soon the FOrayFont stuff will be in the trunk? I'm
waiting on it to fix the Bug where you can't copy and paste chara
Vincent Hennebert-3 wrote:
>
> Luis, would you mind summarizing your problems in a Bugzilla entry? So
> that we can more easily track them, and ensure they will actually be
> corrected in the new font library. Thanks!
>
Will do...
I think it's about time i create a bugzilla login in FOP as it
>> Mayhappen the reasons for changing the font names when working with
>> full/partial embed fonts aren't relevant anymore...
>>
>> Would like to take the oportunity to suggest that a switch like "-fullembed"
>> (or something like that) be used instead of the "-ansi", as a
>> "clarification" of wh
On 18.09.2006 17:05:09 Luis Ferro wrote:
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> >
> > In that case we cannot use the original font
> > name because we don't embed the full font.
>
> 2 questions then...
>
> a) What happens if with a partial embed font it's used the same name as the
> original font n
Yes, this way the whole font is embedded but you only have access to the
WinAnsi subset of characters.
On 18.09.2006 12:28:40 Luis Ferro wrote:
>
> One of the things that appeared from the properties of the document is the
> "actual" font values.
>
> The config i used is:
> kerning="yes
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> In that case we cannot use the original font
> name because we don't embed the full font.
2 questions then...
a) What happens if with a partial embed font it's used the same name as the
original font name?
b) What happens if with a full embed font (with use of -an
One of the things that appeared from the properties of the document is the
"actual" font values.
The config i used is:
And i created the font metrics with the following class call (a short fused
version based on the fop.bat):
org.apache.fop.fonts.apps.TTFReader -enc
I assume the problem comes from FOP's embedding only a subset of the
TrueType font in the PDF. In that case we cannot use the original font
name because we don't embed the full font. If you have to be able to
edit the PDF you'd need to embed the full font in which case we could
use the original nam
Luis Ferro wrote:
>
> The test is simple...
>
Not that simple i'm afraid... i think i'm in a goose chase here regarding
font names... The font that is in use by FOP (thru the config options)
either gets a diferent name in windows or isn't recognized by it (even thru
it's a ttf font, albeit ca
11 matches
Mail list logo
