On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Stephan Beal
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Joe Mistachkin
> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > * miniz-1.16br1
>> >
>> > IMHO, if any library we fold in to our source tree has updates, we
>> > should evaluate them. Miniz certainly fits that description, the
>> > qu
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Ross Berteig wrote:
>
>
> On 3/11/2016 3:40 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
>>
>> Ross Berteig wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * [ff4a] pending-review
>>>
>>> IMHO, merge this.
>>>
>>> Changes how the fusefs command appears when fossil is compiled without
>>> fusefs included. S
This is the conversation I had with the miniz developer
Forwarded conversation
Subject: miniz
From: *Baruch Burstein*
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM
To: richge...@gmail.com
Hi,
I think miniz is really useful, and even incorporated it into fossil scm.
It is marked
On 3/12/2016 2:10 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
Ross Berteig wrote:
It also led me to blog posts from miniz's author. He does seem to
still be alive, but miniz may be dormant.
Do you have a direct link to the authors blog (I don't think the
"cbloomrants" is it)? Can we get somebody to ping him and
Ross Berteig wrote:
>
> It also led me to blog posts from miniz's author. He does seem to
> still be alive, but miniz may be dormant.
>
Do you have a direct link to the authors blog (I don't think the
"cbloomrants" is it)? Can we get somebody to ping him and see if he's
still interested in main
On 3/12/2016 12:24 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
Someone (Baruch?) posted a link to the now-official github site, but
AFAICS it's not actively maintained. i mailed the guy a couple of times
with C89 portability patches and got no response, but IIRC Baruch
reported getting a response from him.
In any
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Joe Mistachkin
wrote:
> >
> > * miniz-1.16br1
> >
> > IMHO, if any library we fold in to our source tree has updates, we
> > should evaluate them. Miniz certainly fits that description, the
> > question may be where the official upstream source is located post
>
