On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Joe Mistachkin <sql...@mistachkin.com> wrote:
> > > > * miniz-1.16br1 > > > > IMHO, if any library we fold in to our source tree has updates, we > > should evaluate them. Miniz certainly fits that description, the > > question may be where the official upstream source is located post > > google-code's closure. > > > > Yes, if we are going to retain support for it, it needs to be up-to-date > (especially it appears to have some issues that zlib does not have). > > However, before updating it, we really need to find its official source. > > If it's no longer actively maintained, we should probably just remove it > from the tree. > Someone (Baruch?) posted a link to the now-official github site, but AFAICS it's not actively maintained. i mailed the guy a couple of times with C89 portability patches and got no response, but IIRC Baruch reported getting a response from him. In any case, i tend to agree - if it's not maintained, we should drop it because it's not a piece "just anyone" can get their fingers in and tweak.
_______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
