Re: [fossil-users] multiple projects

On March 3, 2011 12:15:39 PST, Federico Ramallo wrote: > Hi, > > I am creating multiple fossil repos. There is a way to share users > and passwords? > Because after the 4th repo, we would forget which user and password > was created on each repo > > I was wondering how could reduce user managem

[fossil-users] .gitignore and gitsubmodules

Hi, I was wondering how could I import a git project using submodules. Also how could I use ignore files. Because for what I understand the ignore-glob setting is part of the local state and doesn't get sync, is that correct? Regards, Federico Ramallo

[fossil-users] REST interface

Hi, I was thinking it would be great to have a REST interface with the tickets. How difficult would be to implement? I know there are some ways to parse and dump json from C, but I don't know the level of effort. The concept is to interact with the ticket system from JS and improve the UI. What

Re: [fossil-users] multiple projects

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:41:23PM -0600, Federico Ramallo wrote: > > Actually I was thinking something like: john and mike work on project A > and > > B, C and so on ... > > > > So far I created users on all projects. > > > > Can I share

Re: [fossil-users] multiple projects

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:41:23PM -0600, Federico Ramallo wrote: > Actually I was thinking something like: john and mike work on project A and > B, C and so on ... > > So far I created users on all projects. > > Can I share the user table? You can just copy the entries of the user table, yes.

Re: [fossil-users] multiple projects

Actually I was thinking something like: john and mike work on project A and B, C and so on ... So far I created users on all projects. Can I share the user table? 2011/3/3 Ron Wilson > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Federico Ramallo >

Re: [fossil-users] multiple projects

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Federico Ramallo wrote: >> I am creating multiple fossil repos. There is a way to share users and >> passwords? > > Fossil honors the REMOTE_USER cgi variable.  So if you can configure your > web server to manag

Re: [fossil-users] Hang while waiting for server when using ssh

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:35:43PM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote: > Hello, > >I have run into this problem: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.fossil-scm.user/3515 > >Though I'm using NetBSD/amd64 5.0 (client) against a NetBSD/amd64 4.0 > (server). And I'm using key base

[fossil-users] Hang while waiting for server when using ssh

Hello, I have run into this problem: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.fossil-scm.user/3515 Though I'm using NetBSD/amd64 5.0 (client) against a NetBSD/amd64 4.0 (server). And I'm using key based authentication rather than entering username and password. And another diffe

Re: [fossil-users] multiple projects

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Federico Ramallo wrote: > Hi, > > I am creating multiple fossil repos. There is a way to share users and > passwords? > Because after the 4th repo, we would forget which user and password was > created on each repo > > I was wondering how could reduce user manageme

Re: [fossil-users] multiple projects

2011/3/3 Federico Ramallo > Hi, > > I am creating multiple fossil repos. There is a way to share users and > passwords? > Because after the 4th repo, we would forget which user and password was > created on each repo > > I was wondering how could reduce user management complexity > Federico Rama

[fossil-users] multiple projects

Hi, I am creating multiple fossil repos. There is a way to share users and passwords? Because after the 4th repo, we would forget which user and password was created on each repo I was wondering how could reduce user management complexity ___ fossil-use

Re: [fossil-users] Create new theme

Awesome! Thanks for the info! 2011/3/2 Richard Hipp > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Federico Ramallo wrote: > >> The reason I'm thinking on add a built-in theme is because I'm thinking on >> simply the creating of new projects with the same theme.. > > > > fossil config export skin

Re: [fossil-users] Question about best practices with Fossil.

On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 19:22:32 +0200 "John Found" wrote: > I am really beginer in the world of version control and project > management. Recently I created a repository for one of my projects. > This repository contains the project "Fresh" that consists of two > relatively independent projects "Fres

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

Looks great! I've made a couple of prototype logo changes: http://helixtech.org.uk/fossil/fossil-logo-1s.png http://helixtech.org.uk/fossil/fossil-logo-2s.png They obviously need some work, hope

[fossil-users] Question about best practices with Fossil.

I am really beginer in the world of version control and project management. Recently I created a repository for one of my projects. This repository contains the project "Fresh" that consists of two relatively independent projects "FreshIDE" and "FreshLib". "FreshLib" is actually part of FreshIDE

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:57:06AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > > > > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > > > > > This could have worked, if the first merg

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

Hi, New user thoughts... I think the Fossil website as a Wiki existence should be more clearly explained. I too was "fooled" by this. An inherent feature, is portrayed initially as a bare bones, minimalist website. 1st impressions != lasting impression ;) The name is fine. If this was called bagof

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:57:06AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > > > > This could have worked, if the first merge of the end of January did > > not > > > > h

Re: [fossil-users] Check-in [36e3ab4c42] breaks SSL on mingw

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Petr Man wrote: > Hello, > Check-in [36e3ab4c42] seems to break SSL on mingw, removing "-static" > from TCC fixes it. > Petr > ___ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.o

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > > > This could have worked, if the first merge of the end of January did > not > > > have > > > any rename. It had renames, and due to this, the last merge attemp

[fossil-users] Check-in [36e3ab4c42] breaks SSL on mingw

Hello, Check-in [36e3ab4c42] seems to break SSL on mingw, removing "-static" from TCC fixes it. Petr ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle < stephen.degabrie...@acm.org> wrote: > As, I hope, all list subscribers know, fossil is easily reskinnable. > Being self-hosting, the fossil site is too. > > Can I suggest a competition with a few simple criteria & small reward > - site should

Re: [fossil-users] Failure in the test

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > > > Hello, > > > > we were updating to fossil of the 1st of March, and running its 'make test' > > we've seen one error: > > > > /tmp/nix-build-ry80yizb2mhli5yr7la7by5dn8w6cjdd-fossil-20110301190432.

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > > This could have worked, if the first merge of the end of January did not > > have > > any rename. It had renames, and due to this, the last merge attempt > > complained > > about this like this: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Failure in the test

2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > Hello, > > we were updating to fossil of the 1st of March, and running its 'make test' > we've seen one error: > > /tmp/nix-build-ry80yizb2mhli5yr7la7by5dn8w6cjdd-fossil-20110301190432.drv-0/fossil-src-20110301190432/fossil > test-3 t1 t2 t3 a23 > test merge1-7.2

[fossil-users] Failure in the test

Hello, we were updating to fossil of the 1st of March, and running its 'make test' we've seen one error: /tmp/nix-build-ry80yizb2mhli5yr7la7by5dn8w6cjdd-fossil-20110301190432.drv-0/fossil-src-20110301190432/fossil test-3 t1 t2 t3 a23 test merge1-7.2 FAILED! Richard, can you look at it? Thank you

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > Hello, > > we had an issue merging with renames here. The 'test-shortest-path' takes > what > we think is a *WRONG* path for the merge to happen. > > We had two long-standing branches, that both were updated from trunk from > time > to time. One was merged into t

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

Stephen, you hit on the point that was a revelation to me (back in the day). The Fossil web site isn't a web site; it's the WIKI. The discussions of page design aside, perhaps that fact should be mentioned in the first bullet. -Original Message- From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm

[fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

Hello, we had an issue merging with renames here. The 'test-shortest-path' takes what we think is a *WRONG* path for the merge to happen. We had two long-standing branches, that both were updated from trunk from time to time. One was merged into trunk only recently, altough it has been there for

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

As, I hope, all list subscribers know, fossil is easily reskinnable. Being self-hosting, the fossil site is too. Can I suggest a competition with a few simple criteria & small reward - site should continue to be accessible for the sight impaired - CSS & HTML only. (extensive js can require more lo

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Kristoffer Lawson wrote: > > Some gfx guy could even do a bit with the larger logo.. add a bit of > border, delicate shading. Some details. > > Volunteers? Current image sources can be found here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact?name=672ae62970

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

On 3 Mar 2011, at 16:26, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fair enough. So I spruced up the website with some CSS. What else do you > recommend. Ah, similar type of bar as on the Tcl website. Definitely an improvement. This is exactly the kind of thing that helps, with relatively small effort. I would

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Kristoffer Lawson wrote: > > On 3 Mar 2011, at 13:41, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > > > > Design matters. > > > > > > Design != eye-candy > > Actually there is research to the opposite :-) > > When tested pe

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

On 3 Mar 2011, at 13:41, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > > Design matters. > > > Design != eye-candy Actually there is research to the opposite :-) When tested people quite literally find better looking services to be easier (not to mention

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > > Design matters. > Design != eye-candy -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf

[fossil-users] "fossil bisect" on large repositories

Hi all, a few impressions from the first real use of bisect on the NetBSD tree: (1) "fossil bisect vlist" needs a lot of time before starting to show anything. I measure at least 5s for the cache hot case, if only a single revision has been marked so far (near trunk leaf). (2) It might be a good

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

I love the name fossil and the logo... please don't change it! On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Trou Macacq wrote: > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:37:37 +0200, Chad Perrin wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:25:55PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: >>> >>> My only problem with the name is that it's to common

Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:37:37 +0200, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:25:55PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: >> >> My only problem with the name is that it's to common a word - searching >> for info on fossil keeps turning up paleontological sites. > > Try searching for "fossil scm". It