On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:24 PM, j. van den hoff <
> veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> regarding formatting of the output: I probably would label the
>> corresponding `dbstat' entries like this:
>>
>> ...
>> checkins: 4906
(this time to the list)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:03 AM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> thanks for the info. questions: this does not effect the "off by one"
> between timeline and dbstat
> in the fossil repo itself, right?
>
Correct - i haven't yet looked at that.
> I believe division by "365.242
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:46:20 +0100, Stephan Beal
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Beal
wrote:
the difference between the two numbers differs in different
repositories,
but info/stat consistently show _lower_ values. They use a different
query
for the counting than dbst
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> the difference between the two numbers differs in different repositories,
> but info/stat consistently show _lower_ values. They use a different query
> for the counting than dbstat does, and that query is apparently not 100%
> correct. Once
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, j. v. d. hoff
wrote:
> there is an additionally specific problem (not seen with other repos) that
> the number of `timeline' entries is off by one relative to the `dbstat'
> opinion
> of the number of checkins.
Thanks for the tip.
Reminder to self: check if shu
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:45:36 +0100, Stephan Beal
wrote:
however, in the fossil repo (as of today) I get these number of
checkins:
timeline: 4905
dbstat : 4906
info: 4860
i.e. in this single repo there is a difference of one between timeline
and
dbstat seemingly hinting at
a specif
On Thu, 17 Jan, Stephan Beal wrote:
> @Stefan: any objections to that?
No, that's fine with me. My reasoning for the "-count" was to be able to
easily grep out all the counts if one is interested in just the counts
from the dbstat page:
$ fossil dbstat -R test.fossil | grep count
artifact-count:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:24 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> currently I see with all my (~ 10...) repos -- _except_ with the fossil
> repo itself -- that
> the dbstat count is correct in the sense that it is identical to the number
> of entries visible in the timeline output (hoping/assuming that
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:26:29 +0100, Stephan Beal
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stefan Bellon
wrote:
While this seems to be an easy change, now the "dbstat" command outputs
"checkin-count" while the "info" command outputs "checkins". And
because the "dbstat" outputs quite a few
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stefan Bellon wrote:
> While this seems to be an easy change, now the "dbstat" command outputs
> "checkin-count" while the "info" command outputs "checkins". And
> because the "dbstat" outputs quite a few other "counts" as well, you
> cannot easily change it to "
Hi all,
I just saw the very recent checkin:
[d59455e3f2] Leaf: Change 'checkin-count' to simply 'checkins' to keep
the output aligned.
While this seems to be an easy change, now the "dbstat" command outputs
"checkin-count" while the "info" command outputs "checkins". And
because the "dbstat
11 matches
Mail list logo
