On 2014-03-24 10:57, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said:
Yes. A case where a check is missing doesn't automatically mean a
feature has been implemented where that check is not needed.
Overriding methods with declarations that don't match the origi
In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said:
> >> the construct where forward declared classes is possible.
> > That's a separate language enhancement request, read
> > http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#extensionselect
> Since this is already possible in objfpc mode (at least partially
On 2014-03-24 10:38, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said:
Should I add this to the bugtracker?
Yes. The code with Tfoo and TBar above also shouldn't not compile, at least
not in Delphi mode.
Should I report this as a bug where this construct is no
In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said:
> >> Should I add this to the bugtracker?
> > Yes. The code with Tfoo and TBar above also shouldn't not compile, at least
> > not in Delphi mode.
> Should I report this as a bug where this construct is not allow at all
> (not just Delphi mo
On 2014-03-22 17:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said:
The problem seem to be that the a descendant enumerator class overriding
a virtual method cannot
return a class which i only forward declared.
If the TFoo and TBar classes are moved above th
On 2014-03-22 22:34, hinsta...@yandex.ru wrote:
What you do this for? Using override directive makes no sense in this case, so
I suggest you just don't use it. If you don't use it, the descendant enumerator
will still work like intended
I Think override makes perfect sense in this case.
I get
What you do this for? Using override directive makes no sense in this case, so
I suggest you just don't use it. If you don't use it, the descendant enumerator
will still work like intended
22.03.2014, 20:21, "Torsten Bonde Christiansen" :
> Hi List.
>
> I think i have found a bug related to enum
In our previous episode, Bart said:
> > Yes. The code with Tfoo and TBar above also shouldn't not compile, at least
> > not in Delphi mode.
>
> The double negative is intended here?
No. So Delphi refuses when TFoo and TBar are declared at the top. IMHO
rightfully so.
Both Delphi and FPC also ref
On 3/22/14, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Yes. The code with Tfoo and TBar above also shouldn't not compile, at least
> not in Delphi mode.
The double negative is intended here?
Bart
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lis
In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said:
>
> The problem seem to be that the a descendant enumerator class overriding
> a virtual method cannot
> return a class which i only forward declared.
>
> If the TFoo and TBar classes are moved above the TBarListEnumerator the
> code com
Hi List.
I think i have found a bug related to enumerators, overridden methods
and forward declared classes.
Please consider the code listed here:
http://pastebin.com/8EkVDG5n
The problem seem to be that the a descendant enumerator class overriding
a virtual method cannot
return a class whi
Hi List.
I think i have found a bug related to enumerators, overridden methods
and forward declared classes.
Please consider the code listed here:
http://pastebin.com/8EkVDG5n
The problem seem to be that the a descendant enumerator class overriding
a virtual method cannot
return a class whi
12 matches
Mail list logo
