On Wed, 13 May 2009 15:56:10 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Binding flexibility is required, if application is to be distributed.
There's no way to say, what kind of OpenGL drivers is installed on the
next machine.
First of all this is no answer to my question. I was
OpenGL 3.x also deprecates many OpenGL 1.1 functions (for example immediate
mode). OpenGL 1.1 is not loaded (as there is no need even on windows) so how
does the 'flexibility' help us there?
Binding flexibility is required, if application is to be distributed.
There's no way to say, what
I am just trying to understand the
limitations of the bindings as there seems to be no documentation.
The binding treats OpenGL versions in the same way as any other extension.
Only new version function are loaded on demand. This makes the binding
very *flexible*.
Because some obsolete functions
On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:12:11 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
The binding treats OpenGL versions in the same way as any other extension.
Which isn't a good thing IMHO. The artificial limitation that you have to load
higher version functions like extensions is just
On Mon, 11 May 2009 03:09:40 +0200
Michalis Kamburelis michalis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Change this e.g. to follow each
Result := Load_GL_version_1_5;
by
if not Result then Exit;
Result := FALSE;
Instead I moved the Load_GL_version_x_x calls to the end of the functions.
Replacing
On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:12:11 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Only new version function are loaded on demand. This makes the binding
very *flexible*.
Because some obsolete functions might be removed in future OpenGL versions.
OpenGL 3.x also deprecates many OpenGL 1.1
On Sat, 9 May 2009 22:29:51 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
uses
...gl, glext...
...
if not Load_GL_version_2_0 then begin
writeln('OpenGL 2.0 is not supported');
Halt;
end;
...
This does not work for me. I added it to the Init function of my
On Sun, 10 May 2009 17:54:49 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
hope it helps.
It does, thanks.
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make
sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true?
Nonetheless, I don't
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make
sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true?
Judging from glext, it's true.
You'll also need to initialize any OpenGL extension you might to use.
Nonetheless, I don't understand why the ARB
On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make
sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true?
Judging from glext, it's true.
This makes no sense to me.
Lord Satan wrote:
Nonetheless, I don't understand why the ARB version does not work.
AFAIK it has the same entry points as the core functionality and
OpenGL versions are required to support the ARB version of functions
even if the non ARB version is in the core now.
No. OpenGL doesn't
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to
2.0 to make sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are
initialized. Is this true?
Judging from glext, it's true.
This
On Sun, 10 May 2009 22:40:59 +0200
Michalis Kamburelis michalis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean you want to change Load_GL_version_2_0 to also call
Load_GL_version_1_5 under the hood,
On Sun, 10 May 2009 23:47:07 +0200
Lord Satan reimg...@web.de wrote:
I uploaded the patch to the bug tracker as issue #0013687
S.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 23:47:07 +0200
Lord Satan reimg...@web.de wrote:
I uploaded the patch to the bug tracker as issue #0013687
Looking quickly at the patch, it doesn't seem to set Result values
correctly. For example, all Load_GL_version_xxx will always return true,
if
15 matches
Mail list logo
