Normally, a backslash followed by another character is treated as an escape
mechanism for the subsequent character.
So, \Dabc for example, gives you a double dagger before the characters abc,
etc. This is completely normal behavior from FrameMaker's perspective.
If you truly want a path to
? Actually, it's a link to another drive (N) and then a path down to the file.
So I've got
? N:\Departments\Financial:January2014.fm
Ah! I'd suggest trying this:
N:/Departments/Financial/January2014.fm
It ought to work just fine in Windows - which converts the single forward-slash
Yes, this looks correct to me - I think the last one from you was also correct
(but not the original)!
Thanks, Peter.
Z
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Peter Barraud
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:34 PM
To: Craig Ede
Cc:
Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Cc: Scott Turner; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: ExtendScript Scripting Guide Adobe FrameMaker ...
Hi All,
The updated ESTK scripting guides are now available online:
Fm11
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/framemaker/scripting/index.html (or you can take
+2423, which actually makes it look better for my needs!
Thanks again for all your help!
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:24 PM
To: 'Alan Litchfield'; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: What do you all
Hi, everybody.
In my specifications, I often need to show a space character ... for a text
format sample, for example.
I usually use a fixed-width font (Consolas) for these format samples. This
helps to make the space character obvious, but isn't perfect.
Elsewhere, I have also seen the use
: What do you all recommend for showing space characters?
Hi,
The UTF-8 code for it is U+2423 and it is called Open Box (␣).
In LaTeX you can use the \textvisiblespace{} macro.
Regards
Alan
On 15/03/14 2:09 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) wrote:
Hi, everybody.
In my specifications
. Learning experience for me, I guess ...
Z
From: Craig Ede [mailto:craig...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 8:23 AM
To: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net); framers
Subject: RE: Having problems with importing an EPS file into FrameMaker ...
Wouldn't it make sense
A bit of a final post here for closure, and to answer Mike comments below.
1. The original EPS was indeed vector, not bitmap.
2. Agreed that the 1800 dpi PNG file was large.
a. Reducing it to 300 dpi made it much smaller.
b. Better yet: doing NO anti-aliasing for the PNG
Excellent! Less sad now. :)
Thanks,
Z
From: Peter Barraud [mailto:gapet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:44 AM
To: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Cc: Scott Turner; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: ExtendScript Scripting Guide Adobe FrameMaker ...
Hi Syed
Hi, all.
I am trying to import a graphic - with only four colors in it - (it is in EPS
format) and am having some bizarre difficulties. When I view the EPS file on my
Windows system using PS_view, it looks perfectly fine - even when zoomed in.
However, for some reason, the file comes into
...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
I am trying to import a graphic - with only four colors in it - (it is
in EPS format) and am having some bizarre difficulties. When I view
the EPS file on my Windows system using PS_view, it looks perfectly
fine - even when zoomed in.
However, for some
[mailto:alison.cr...@ultrasonix.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:58 PM
To: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Having problems with importing an EPS file into FrameMaker ...
As you have CS3, open the EPS in Illustrator and use the File Export
change too, I suppose), so had fuzzy color
transitions along color edges (in a logo).
Z
From: Lin Sims [mailto:ljsims...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:46 PM
To: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Having problems with importing
From: Fred Ridder [mailto:docu...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:05 PM
To: Lin Sims; Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Having problems with importing an EPS file into FrameMaker ...
Your recollection is absolutely correct regarding
Thanks, Mike.
I think that Alison was just responding to my request to understand how to save
as a PNG from Photoshop. :)
FWIW, this is just a simple 4 color corporate logo, so I am not too worried
about using PNG format. As long as it shows cleanly in the output PDF of my
documents (and
Does anyone know if a new version of this guide is available:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/framemaker/scripting/framemaker_10_scripting.pdf
A search of their site did not find any version 11 or version 12 guide ...
Adobe needs to place documentation (and appropriate links) more consistently on
Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:48 AM
To: 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'
Subject: RE: ExtendScript Scripting Guide Adobe FrameMaker ...
A sorta related question: the Adobe ExtendScript Tookkit (ESTK) was available
as a stand-alone download in version 3.5
Scott Turner said in response to my earlier post:
Why would they keep documentation current? Adobe is the new Microsoft.
Customers/users are irrelevant.
Sad ... :(
Z
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:40, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
Does anyone know
such words *in the LaTeX source*. Of course, any editing that
resulted in text flow destroyed this, with the manually hyphenated word now
appearing hyphenated within a line. Yech.
--
Steve
___
You are currently subscribed to framers as syed.hos
At 09:57 -0800 3/3/14, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) wrote:
Agreed that LaTeX has a steep learning curve and, in this WYSIWYG world, it
may seem
like a step backward to some people. However, the power and flexibility
(with highly
consistent formatted output) is very
Alan Salo wrote:
My team converts our material to Word frequently for our Product Support
group to use.
Our trick is to create a pdf of the Frame document (as we normally do; our
preferred delivery). We then use Acrobat's File... Save As Other...
Microsoft Word... to create a .docx Word
to framers as syed.hos...@aeris.net.
Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/syed.hosain%40aeris.net
Send administrative questions to listad
) Software with Windows
7 and the opening post specifically mentioned FM7 and Acrobat 7, which do have
problems with 64-bit Windows.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Syed Zaeem Hosain
(syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
most people do not use old programs that don't work in 64
and 4GB
on 32-bit is not a bottleneck.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain
(syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
On a modern computer/laptop of the past few years, which are usually fully
64-bit capable and _usually_ have more than 4GB of main memory, installing
Helen Borrie said:
Just a point to those encouraging Carrie to install as 64-bit - there's no
way you can make a 32-bit application install or run as 64-bit.
You are correct, but ... I think the suggestions have been to install the
Windows 7 OS itself as 64-bit, not the application, on
Steve Rickaby wrote:
At some point while editing yesterday, and I'm not sure what I was doing,
*every chapter* in the book I'm working on started displaying all its text as
if someone had picked it up and randomly scattered it across the page -
complete loss of vertical leading, and
Mike, point taken. Dr. Reng said the same thing too.
Perhaps ... a different question that may be more interesting:
Do people here feel that it is necessary to check a PDF in a Reader
only environment if that PDF looks fine in Acrobat?
Because, I have yet to see one of my files pass
Since then, I have relied on two things:
DropBox is my friend ;-)
Yes, indeed! I do daily backups stored on multiple disks - both here and at
home - for safety.
I use DropBox, but not for these backup files ... yet ...
Z
___
You are currently
I understand the concern you all are talking about ... maybe, I have been
lucky. :)
Like I mentioned, my default setting and use (almost all the time actually) is
Acrobat. With the exception of TeXStudio (that has its own built-in PDF
displayer linked to the LaTeX source) when I am creating
Maxwell Hoffman said:
For another viewpoint, Adobe was just named in the top 100 companies to work
for by Fortune. Our 2013 revenues considerably exceeded projections. So
somebody out there is happy with Adobe. ;-)
Perhaps. :) But, at what cost?
The unhappy ones are probably the small
Rick Quatro said:
Excellent point by Syed. Another point that is easy to miss in this
discussion: If all of Adobe's products had the level of quality control that
FrameMaker has (long-standing and new bugs, outdated and incomplete
documentation, etc.), Adobe certainly wouldn't be as
I understand the concern you all are talking about ... maybe, I have been
lucky. :)
Like I mentioned, my default setting and use (almost all the time actually) is
Acrobat. With the exception of TeXStudio (that has its own built-in PDF
displayer "linked" to the LaTeX source) when I am creating
Maxwell Hoffman said:
> For another viewpoint, Adobe was just named in the top 100 companies to work
> for by Fortune. Our 2013 revenues considerably exceeded projections. So
> "somebody" out there is happy with Adobe. ;-)
Perhaps. :) But, at what cost?
The unhappy ones are probably the small
Rick Quatro said:
> Excellent point by Syed. Another point that is easy to miss in this
> discussion: If all of Adobe's products had the level of quality control that
> FrameMaker has (long-standing and new bugs, outdated and incomplete
> documentation, etc.), Adobe certainly wouldn't be as
> Also, at $400, I doubt if FrameMaker XML Author is going to be able to
> compete with other XML editors out there. The idea is fantastic, but the cost
> needs to be around $100-150 a seat.
A list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_XML_editors. Many licensed
and free versions listed
Hi, Tammy and Fred.
I know about the dire warnings on installing both Reader and Acrobat on the
same system, but I have done this without any issues for more than five or six
years now (since Reader 7 onwards, as I recall).
I always install Reader first, and then Acrobat afterwards - so that
I suspect that it is the Reader uninstall process that has the potential to
cause problems with duplicated files, or registry entries and the like.
I now leave Reader and Acrobat both installed (in the order that I mentioned in
the other response) and there are no issues - Acrobat is used as
I guess my reaction is that the information from Dov at that link you found is
from 2004 - almost ten years ago... on Windows 98 and Windows XP systems
apparently, etc.
The results may be quite different today perhaps? Or maybe it is my approach of
always installing Acrobat after Reader ...
Hi, Tammy and Fred.
I know about the dire warnings on installing both Reader and Acrobat on the
same system, but I have done this without any issues for more than five or six
years now (since Reader 7 onwards, as I recall).
I always install Reader first, and then Acrobat afterwards - so that
I suspect that it is the Reader uninstall process that has the potential to
cause problems with duplicated files, or registry entries and the like.
I now leave Reader and Acrobat both installed (in the order that I mentioned in
the other response) and there are no issues - Acrobat is used as
I guess my reaction is that the information from Dov at that link you found is
from 2004 - almost ten years ago... on Windows 98 and Windows XP systems
apparently, etc.
The results may be quite different today perhaps? Or maybe it is my approach of
always installing Acrobat after Reader ...
I think you need the Italic version of that font - you just have the Regular
and Bold font files apparently. With old Adobe Type 1 fonts, for example, there
were multiple separate files for each font set that needed to be available.
For example, my old Helvetica, Helvetica-Black and
AOLIVE.TTF
10/11/1992 11:00 PM53,920 AOLIVEB.TTF
10/11/1992 11:00 PM54,836 AOLIVEI.TTF
3 File(s)160,612 bytes
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:32 PM
To: 'Tammy Van Boening'; 'FrameUsers List'
Subject
I think you need the Italic version of that font - you just have the Regular
and Bold font files apparently. With old Adobe Type 1 fonts, for example, there
were multiple separate files for each "font" set that needed to be available.
For example, my old "Helvetica", "Helvetica-Black" and
PM51,856 AOLIVE.TTF
10/11/1992 11:00 PM53,920 AOLIVEB.TTF
10/11/1992 11:00 PM54,836 AOLIVEI.TTF
3 File(s)160,612 bytes
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:32 PM
To: 'Tammy Van Boening'; 'FrameUsers List'
Subj
Steve Rickaby said:
As an avid use and evangeliser of FrameMaker since version 3,
Same here ... I began using FrameMaker in 1988 on a Sun 3/50 in SunOS.
Steve Rickaby said:
I think some decisions have been made that Adobe could come to regret.
Unfortunately, I agree.
Z
Rick Quatro said:
The FrameMaker Word import filter leaves a line-feed character at the end of
each paragraph. You can't see it, but it is there and apparently affects your
search. I routinely strip them out in my scripts. A MIF-wash should remove
them.
I have seen exactly this too. But,
Steve Rickaby said:
> As an avid use and evangeliser of FrameMaker since version 3,
Same here ... I began using FrameMaker in 1988 on a Sun 3/50 in SunOS.
Steve Rickaby said:
> I think some decisions have been made that Adobe could come to regret.
Unfortunately, I agree.
Z
Rick Quatro said:
> The FrameMaker Word import filter leaves a line-feed character at the end of
> each paragraph. You can't see it, but it is there and apparently affects your
> search. I routinely strip them out in my scripts. A MIF-wash should remove
> them.
I have seen exactly this too.
(syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:22 PM
To: Robert Lauriston; Framers
Subject: RE: FrameMaker 12 released
I don't plan to do the subscription model for FrameMaker 12 either. It does not
make sense for me - even if I were continuing with FrameMaker.
It only makes _some_ sense
[mailto:framers-bounces at
lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:22 PM
To: Robert Lauriston; Framers
Subject: RE: FrameMaker 12 released
I don't plan to do the subscription model for FrameMaker 12 either. It does not
make sense f
16, 2014 10:12 AM
To: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net); Simon BUCH; 'Framers'
Subject: RE: FrameMaker 12 released
I wanted to add some clarification to points raised in this discussion.
[1] Regarding how people behind firewalls can deal with monthly ping on
subscription, I got some
Robert Lauriston said:
If you buy a subscription and don't renew at the end of the year, the license
is invalid and FrameMaker stops working.
If you buy the $1000 full version or a $400 or $600 upgrade, the license is
perpetual. The only thing that expires is the support agreement.
I
) and have already switched to LaTeX for all my new work. The
price and upgrade costs of LaTeX - after a 2 month learning curve - are
infinitely better for _my_ needs! :)
Z
-Original Message-
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:22 PM
, for you, an earlier version, I guess.
Z
I don't understand your reasoning. I don't need upgrades to use FrameMaker.
It has been going downhill from version 9 on.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain
(syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
Yeah, I would love to continue
I don't understand why you would stop using it for new docs. Most of the
software I've bought I've never upgraded.
I guess you and I have a different philosophy about these, I suppose. :) I
prefer to stay up on software upgrades when I am using something extensively.
The thinking is to get
Thanks for the information, Maxwell.
I read through your blog info and have a question - although the answer may be
academic for me (see paragraph below!) :)
1. What happens after the first year is complete? Is it a "renewed every
year for a year" contract?
2. Does cancelling after
Robert Lauriston said:
> If you buy a subscription and don't renew at the end of the year, the license
> is invalid and FrameMaker stops working.
> If you buy the $1000 full version or a $400 or $600 upgrade, the license is
> perpetual. The only thing that expires is the support agreement.
> I
) and have already switched to LaTeX for all my new work. The
price and upgrade "costs" of LaTeX - after a 2 month learning curve - are
infinitely better for _my_ needs! :)
Z
-Original Message-
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 20
My comment was that at some time, I could simply stop upgrading and continue to
use that last version (as you had mentioned in a post last year) rather than
change all the older documents to a new tool.
We simply chose to stop at different versions, I suppose ... for me, it is
version 11, for
> I don't understand why you would stop using it for new docs. Most of the
> software I've bought I've never upgraded.
I guess you and I have a different philosophy about these, I suppose. :) I
prefer to stay up on software upgrades when I am using something extensively.
The thinking is to get
of any information contained in it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail
and immediately destroy this e-mail and its attachments.
___
You are currently subscribed to framers as syed.hos...@aeris.net
Calling every 30 days for the subscription model version would get old pretty
quick, though! :)
Z
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Coatsworth
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:06 AM
To: 'Framers'
Subject: RE:
Simon Buch wrote:
? c. In Kapil VERMA's blog entry, there's a section about Licensing options:
'Furthermore, we are providing both perpetual and subscription licensing
options on all our products. We do realize that the licensing needs of our
customers vary and hence, we are offering both
Correct. The cost is charged monthly - with an annual commitment. After 30
days, if you cancel, you will be billed 50% of the remaining contract
obligation.
What I meant was that the software checks activation every 30 days ...
presumably, without Internet access, you would have to call every
Yeah! :) No internet access allowed for them, so they would have to get the
perpetual licenses ...
Z
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Coatsworth
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:51 AM
To: 'Framers'
Subject: RE:
just calling to get activation done, I suspect it will not happen
at some sites.
Z
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:05 AM
To: 'Scott Prentice'; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FrameMaker 12 released
Correct. The cost is charged monthly
Thanks for the links. Some links on the FAQ page for FM 12 are broken ...
notably one that takes you to the subscription pricing (including a
"promotional" pricing discount).
Also, sorry to beat on this drum still, but the upgrade price of $399 from
FrameMaker 11 is still too high to be
Calling every 30 days for the subscription model version would get old pretty
quick, though! :)
Z
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Coatsworth
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:06 AM
To: 'Framers'
Subject: RE:
Simon Buch wrote:
? c. In Kapil VERMA's blog entry, there's a section about "Licensing options":
'Furthermore, we are providing both perpetual and subscription licensing
options on all our products. We do realize that the licensing needs of our
customers vary and hence, we are offering
Correct. The cost is charged monthly - with an annual commitment. After 30
days, if you cancel, you will be billed 50% of the remaining contract
obligation.
What I meant was that the software checks activation every 30 days ...
presumably, without Internet access, you would have to call every
Yeah! :) No internet access allowed for them, so they would have to get the
perpetual licenses ...
Z
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Coatsworth
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:51 AM
To: 'Framers'
Subject: RE:
to open a firewall - even if temporarily
- rather than just calling to get activation done, I suspect it will not happen
at some sites.
Z
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:05 AM
To: 'Scott Prentice'; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: F
I am not particularly familiar with the Mac, so these would be real SWAGs:
1. Is it a wireless mouse? And, if so, have you tried changing its batteries? I
have seen occasional misbehavior with my wireless mouse when the batteries are
low.
2. Does the middle scroll wheel also have a push-button
I am not particularly familiar with the Mac, so these would be real SWAGs:
1. Is it a wireless mouse? And, if so, have you tried changing its batteries? I
have seen occasional misbehavior with my wireless mouse when the batteries are
low.
2. Does the middle scroll wheel also have a push-button
Robert Lauriston wrote:
What language is the API written in?
Can't comment on the original question posed, but, FWIW, our API's are written
in C++ for some, web services (XML/SOAP) for others, and, more recently, REST
for some new web interfaces.
For our API documents, in the past 13 to 14
Robert Lauriston wrote:
> What language is the API written in?
Can't comment on the original question posed, but, FWIW, our API's are written
in C++ for some, web services (XML/SOAP) for others, and, more recently, REST
for some new web interfaces.
For our API documents, in the past 13 to 14
Fred,
You have described TeX Live very well, so I will only add a few more words
based on my recent experiences with it.
1. Although there are a few distributions listed on the CTAN web site, the
TeX Live package has proven effective for me, even though they recommended a
different one
Fred,
You have described TeX Live very well, so I will only add a few more words
based on my recent experiences with it.
1. Although there are a few distributions listed on the CTAN web site, the
TeX Live package has proven effective for me, even though they recommended a
different one
? Isn't LaTex a non-WYSIWYG application, though? I can't imagine working that
way in this century. I don't think I've done that since Wordstar. :)
? Mike Wickham
Absolutely correct that it is non-WYSIWYG for the text input. So, it does
require a change in thinking when writing.
However,
PDF generation with intra-document references is one of the limitations in
Adobe Acrobat equivalents from other sources (when used with FrameMaker) - Rick
Quatro had mentioned this in a response to one of my earlier posts too.
However, from TeXstudio (i.e., when using LaTeX), I can get
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: So Long and Thanks for the Fish -- Migrating from FrameMaker to
Flare
On 30/10/13 7:25 AM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) wrote:
PDF generation with intra-document references is one of the limitations in
Adobe Acrobat equivalents from
are currently subscribed to framers as syed.hos...@aeris.net.
Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/syed.hosain%40aeris.net
Send administrative
? Isn't LaTex a non-WYSIWYG application, though? I can't imagine working that
way in this century. I don't think I've done that since Wordstar. :)
? Mike Wickham
Absolutely correct that it is non-WYSIWYG for the text input. So, it does
require a change in thinking when writing.
However,
PDF generation with intra-document references is one of the limitations in
Adobe Acrobat equivalents from other sources (when used with FrameMaker) - Rick
Quatro had mentioned this in a response to one of my earlier posts too.
However, from TeXstudio (i.e., when using LaTeX), I can get
That looks good indeed - the description is exactly what I want! I will have to
try it out.
Thanks much,
Z
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Alan Litchfield
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:46
Uh dummy me - hyperref is what I am already using. Just
haven't explored all the options yet ...
Z
> That looks good indeed - the description is exactly what I want! I will have
> to try it out.
> Thanks much,
> Z
On 30/10/13 7:25 AM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at aeris.net) wrote:
>
Hi, Joseph.
You are not the only one who is abandoning FrameMaker ... if you look at my
posts in the past months, I have done the same although I have been using it
since 1988 off and on. I am still on the list for old times sake, though. :)
Please do send me your detailed reasons in an
Hi, Joseph.
You are not the only one who is abandoning FrameMaker ... if you look at my
posts in the past months, I have done the same although I have been using it
since 1988 off and on. I am still on the list for old times sake, though. :)
Please do send me your detailed reasons in an
Darn! I just noticed that I am having trouble displaying any text in Type 1
fonts in Word documents - they are all displaying as Arial, although the font
metrics from the original Type 1 font are making it display very poorly.
I wonder if this is related in any way to what you experienced too?
Darn! I just noticed that I am having trouble displaying any text in Type 1
fonts in Word documents - they are all displaying as Arial, although the font
metrics from the original Type 1 font are making it "display" very poorly.
I wonder if this is related in any way to what you experienced
, but are changing them all anyway
because Adobe got hacked? That makes about as much sense as rekeying the
locks in your house.
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain
(syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
FWIW, I use different passwords on different sites, so I am
Robert Lauriston wrote:
> You use a different password for every site, but are changing them all anyway
> because Adobe got hacked? That makes about as much sense as rekeying the
> locks in your house.
I like wearing suspenders and a belt too. :)
Seriously, I take my password settings as an
...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Syed Zaeem Hosain
(syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 7:05 PM
To: Alan T Litchfield; framers@lists.frameusers.com Forum
Subject: RE: Adobe was hacked
I would also add that the Adobe Cloud model
Milan Davidović [mailto:milan.li...@gmail.com] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Alan Litchfield a...@alphabyte.co.nz wrote:
some does not thing to reduce the effect of criminals who have been
provided with the means for gaining access to *our money*.
So, per the terms and conditions
Milan Davidović milan.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote:
That added cost would be smaller per person/account than the cost (not just
money) of dealing with the resulting fraud costs.
Honestly, just
Theresa de Valence wrote:
One thing that did help, the bank card agreed to accept the old card, if the
card was presented in person, so this may help you too.
Good point. I forgot to mention that the American Express guy recommended
carrying my old card too (since I booked the flight and
at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces at
lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 7:05 PM
To: Alan T Litchfield; framers at lists.frameusers.com Forum
Subject: RE: Adobe was hacked
I would also add that the Adobe Cloud model
Milan Davidovi? [mailto:milan.lists at gmail.com] wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Alan Litchfield
> wrote:
> > some does not thing to reduce the effect of criminals who have been
> > provided with the means for gaining access to *our money*.
> So, per the terms and conditions of your
101 - 200 of 856 matches
Mail list logo
