For the record...
A comparison of random text sizes in PDF as created from FrameMaker 7.2 and
Word 2002 on the same system (XP) shows the same or slightly smaller
rounding deviations when using Word (eg: 10.02 in Word->PDF, vs. 9.96 in
FM->PDF, when 10 points are specified in the source file).
For the record...
A comparison of random text sizes in PDF as created from FrameMaker 7.2 and
Word 2002 on the same system (XP) shows the same or slightly smaller
rounding deviations when using Word (eg: 10.02 in Word->PDF, vs. 9.96 in
FM->PDF, when 10 points are specified in the source file).
13:19:06 +0100
From: "Reng, Winfried"
Subject: AW: Line width in inported graphics slightly diminishing in
FM generated PDFs
To:
Message-ID:
<1F5BCB07D8AED54190885844E0EC675D4ED24E at TFSDEMS30002.tycoce.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-88
13:19:06 +0100
From: "Reng, Winfried" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AW: Line width in inported graphics slightly diminishing in
FM generated PDFs
To:
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
>
Thank you for the tip, Peter.
We tried .ai, but it was the same; and since we have a lot of graphics,
we don't want to be saving them in .pdf.
I'm still curious why this happens, but for the practical matter at hand,
we decided to use 0.21 pts for minimum line width in our graphics.
Yosuke
P
To: framers@FrameUsers.com
> Subject: Re: Line width in inported graphics slightly
> diminishing in FM generated PDFs
>
> At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>
> >We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner
than
> >0.2 pts. The th
: framers at FrameUsers.com
> Subject: Re: Line width in inported graphics slightly
> diminishing in FM generated PDFs
>
> At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>
> >We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner
than
> >0.2 pts. Th
Hi,
> >We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines
> thinner than
> >0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
> >but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs
> created from
> >FM, Acrobat preflight says the graphics uses "0.199600pt" line
At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
>0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
>but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
>FM, Acrobat preflight says the gra
At 2:54 PM +0900 3/8/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>Thank you for the tip, Peter.
>
>We tried .ai, but it was the same; and since we have a lot of graphics,
>we don't want to be saving them in .pdf.
I believe that the file format of later releases of Illustrator is
PDF. If you're saving your AI file
Hi,
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat preflight says the graphics uses "0.199600pt" lines.
PDFs of these
On 8 Mar 2006, at 00:52, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
> We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
> 0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
> but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
> FM, Acrobat preflight says t
At 2:54 PM +0900 3/8/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
Thank you for the tip, Peter.
We tried .ai, but it was the same; and since we have a lot of graphics,
we don't want to be saving them in .pdf.
I believe that the file format of later releases of Illustrator is
PDF. If you're saving your AI files
Hi,
> >We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines
> thinner than
> >0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
> >but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs
> created from
> >FM, Acrobat preflight says the graphics uses "0.199600pt" line
At 09:52 +0900 8/3/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
>0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
>but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
>FM, Acrobat preflight says the gra
On 8 Mar 2006, at 00:52, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat preflight says the gra
Thank you for the tip, Peter.
We tried .ai, but it was the same; and since we have a lot of graphics,
we don't want to be saving them in .pdf.
I'm still curious why this happens, but for the practical matter at hand,
we decided to use 0.21 pts for minimum line width in our graphics.
Yosuke
P
Hi, Yosuke:
At 9:52 AM +0900 3/8/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
>0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
>but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
>FM, Acrobat p
Hi, Yosuke:
At 9:52 AM +0900 3/8/06, Yosuke Ichikawa wrote:
Hi,
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat prefl
Hi,
We're using Acrobat's preflight feature to check for lines thinner than
0.2 pts. The thinnest lines in our .eps graphics are exactly 0.2 pts,
but when we import these graphics in FM and check the PDFs created from
FM, Acrobat preflight says the graphics uses "0.199600pt" lines.
PDFs of these
20 matches
Mail list logo
