:57, Jon Stahl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: framework-team-boun...@lists.plone.org [mailto:framework-team-
boun...@lists.plone.org] On Behalf Of Wichert Akkerman
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:53 PM
To: framework-team@lists.plone.org
Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] Supported Plone Rele
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:framework-team-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wichert Akkerman
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:53 PM
> To: framework-team@lists.plone.org
> Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] Supported Plone Releases
>
&
Previously Jon Stahl wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:framework-team-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve McMahon
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 8:31 AM
> > To: Framework Team
> > Subject: Re: [F
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:framework-team-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve McMahon
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 8:31 AM
> To: Framework Team
> Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] Supported Plone Releases
>
> > Why bring th
On 12/10/08 7:01 PM, Alec Mitchell wrote:
I just want to note that I'm willing to make releases of Plone 2.5 to
fix truly critical bugs and security issues, provided those fixes
aren't too invasive (e.g. the most recent round of CSRF fixes are not
really feasible for incorporation into 2.5). If
I just want to note that I'm willing to make releases of Plone 2.5 to
fix truly critical bugs and security issues, provided those fixes
aren't too invasive (e.g. the most recent round of CSRF fixes are not
really feasible for incorporation into 2.5). If that is "supported",
then consider it suppor
> Why bring this up on the framework team list? The framework team is not
> a governing body.
Then, who is? I certainly think that if the framework team makes a
decision on this, it would be widely respected and supported.
I think that the PF Board would prefer not to make the decision, in
order
On 12/10/08 5:24 PM, Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
I just noticed that on the PSC the Plone 2.5.5 release is listed as
not supported. I'd suggest that unless we have sent an email to the
announce li
On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
I just noticed that on the PSC the Plone 2.5.5 release is listed as
not supported. I'd suggest that unless we have sent an email to the
announce list that the latest 2.5.x relases still be "supporte
Previously Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
> I just noticed that on the PSC the Plone 2.5.5 release is listed as
> not supported. I'd suggest that unless we have sent an email to the
> announce list that the latest 2.5.x relases still be "supported". I
> also noticed that some of the older 3.1
Hi Gang,
I just noticed that on the PSC the Plone 2.5.5 release is listed as
not supported. I'd suggest that unless we have sent an email to the
announce list that the latest 2.5.x relases still be "supported". I
also noticed that some of the older 3.1 releases are still listed as
suppo
11 matches
Mail list logo
