Charlie Kester wrote:
On Wed 03 Feb 2010 at 11:29:14 PST Chuck Robey wrote:
I asked for all opinions, but I need to answer here before my thread gets
hijacked. I DON'T WANT GUI-less operation, I don't want random
playback. I
really do appreciate your response, but what I'm after
Charlie Kester wrote:
On Wed 03 Feb 2010 at 11:29:14 PST Chuck Robey wrote:
I asked for all opinions, but I need to answer here before my thread gets
hijacked. I DON'T WANT GUI-less operation, I don't want random
playback. I
really do appreciate your response, but what I'm after
Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
I've had some great suggestions so far. I think I'll go try amarok first,
and
maybe rhythmbox next. You folks are REALLY helpful, thanks!!
If you don't mind using java, you can also take a look at atunes
Charlie Kester wrote:
On Tue 02 Feb 2010 at 16:04:51 PST Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:18:41 -0800, Charlie Kester
corky1...@comcast.net wrote:
On Tue 02 Feb 2010 at 14:34:42 PST Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I've been trying Rhythmbox too lately. It also recognizes IDv3 tags,
I'm having a hard time trying to figure out what/where is the best playlist
driven audio player with a graphical UI ... there's too large a selection (both
audio and multimedia dirs) for any reasonable manual search, and since I'm after
a good graphical UI for it, I couldn't even construct any
Bakul Shah wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:01:22 EST Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
I need to block out a mildly complex OO diagram, and I wanted to get a
suggestion for what ports selection might be best.
inkscape if you want something
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 15 Dec 2009, at 20:48, Chuck Robey wrote:
I need to block out a mildly complex OO diagram, and I wanted to get a
suggestion for what ports selection might be best.
So far, everything I've tried has either been so extremely full of jargon
that
one can't use it without
I need to block out a mildly complex OO diagram, and I wanted to get a
suggestion for what ports selection might be best.
So far, everything I've tried has either been so extremely full of jargon that
one can't use it without a semester course in it (or 6 months rereading the UML
spec). The last
Jayton Garnett wrote:
I used to be naive too, thinking Unix was better in all respects. Then got a
job working in a predominately Windows environment, and most of the
problems I encounter are third party software issues - hardly the fault of
Microsoft eh? Yes Unix is far more interesting as
Xin LI wrote:
For those who are interested:
http://www.fsf.org/news/2009-05-cisco-settlement.html
Huh. The results of this aren't going to be what the FSF prays for, I think.
I've worked for more than one company who said, basically, that they would
contribute tomorrow. They really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 April 2009 at 11:05:24 +, Rick N wrote:
(Actually) and Histrorically, Sun had a lot to do with the BSD's
(and vice-versa), Bill Joy's early work and contibution to the
BSD/Unix which later he took to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am truly impressed with that new handhelp computer, the Pandora. I read
somewhere (I'm trying to find where I saw this) that the Pandora is very
compatible with the BeagleBoard. I was just wondering if any of the work being
done for the ARM on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org writes:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org writes:
The only real sin is not sticking to one style per project.
Or at *least* per file.
Umm, no, per project. Folks are too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't justify keeping this is ports any longer, I think it violates the list's
rules, no matter how much I like this thread, so I'm moving it to -chat. If you
think I'm wrong, I guess it could be moved again.
matt donovan wrote:
snip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org writes:
The only real sin is not sticking to one style per project.
Or at *least* per file.
Umm, no, per project. Folks are too pushed into errors when a project has 29
different styles. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
michael wrote:
Moved to FreeBSD-chat, all opinions really belong there.
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Tabbing is the worst form of indentation. It is *much* better to use
spaces consistently.
The only real sin is not sticking to one style per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This subject hasn't for anything at all to do with current, fellas, let's move
it to chat, ok? it's going to get you into public trouble.
Randy Bush wrote:
tar cjf - . | ssh u...@hostb (cd /desired/path; tar xjf -)
But I can't get full wire speed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sor...@cydem.org wrote:
[snip]
question: if the browser_products of other entities are --so--
problematic, just --how-- difficult would it be to roll our own ?
note that this question is --not-- the same as asking
how long it would take to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Murray Stokely wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
You said that most written things are hierarchical. Sorry, I strongly
disagree,
I disagree also. Nobody on this thread said that except you. Your
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 01:53:38PM -0800, Murray Stokely wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
big snip
Another advantage of XML is greater familiarity with the toolset
amongst the target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just felt like venting my own opinions on what's the current best toolset for
writing documents. I think that this opinion isn't a popular one, but that's
what this list is for. I'll give you all of my reasons, so at least you'll know
what to argue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turns out that uplcom(4) adapters don't support the required
speed of 50 baud anymore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason C. Wells wrote:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Short version: bullshit.
The slightly longer version is that this is unfounded speculation - not
even that, it's just a random blogger expressing a wish that Apple would
do something which they
then you haven't got a sense of humor, this is the best I've see lately. Do
yourself a favor, I've attached a jpg, if your mailer doesn't inline it, go out
of your way and display it, it's worth your time!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
redirected to -chat
Astrodog wrote:
I'd like to propose the creation of a freebsd-legal mailing list.
Beyond moving threads like this one off of -current, I believe it
would provide a valuable place to discuss things like DTrace
licensing, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
redirected to -chat.
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Aryeh M. Friedman
writes:
We need more licenses like we need a 3rd or 4th leg. What is
wrong with the standard BSD license please?
I decided
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:46:23 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to elaborate slightly on the previous reply
One thing that FOSS (BSD or GPL) has historical had issues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DAve wrote:
Front posting here, because I don't want anyone replyihng to this one. My
aim is to inform that this has been directed to an incorrect list for what
sounds to me like FreeBSD boosterism. The correct list for that sort of
subject is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Redirected to -chat, because it got too flamish.
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Marian Hettwer wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:37:07 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
(note, because I went a bit off-topic, I redirected this to -chat)
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It's a chicken and egg problem.
There's nothing wrong with writing an extremely strict standard.
The issue is the implementation.
If your server implementation is so strict that most clients have
Marc Spitzer wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 11:35 PM, Tom Wickline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 10:30 PM, Marc Spitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the interesting things about socialism, in all in many evil
forms(including gnu/fsf), is that they simply must lie about their
program or
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*PLEASE ONLY REPLY TO ME OR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Omigod!!
For Gods sake, could you PLEASE not have folks reply to the list! We
have been sufficiently bombarded with this already. If you must have
the replies public, then
Tom Wickline wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 11:41 PM, Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's worth noting that the WINE project, not long ago, abandoned
the BSD license for the GPL despite urging from many sources to keep
the code open and free for use by developers. We've stopped using it
as a
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Beastie's Law:
Any demand of a modification of FreeBSD or it's website
using political incorrectness as the justification is automatically
wrong.
Political Incorrectness is very subjective though.
It doesen't matter. What constitutes a Nazi
34 matches
Mail list logo
