/home/des/tinderbox/tinderbox.sh: /home/des/tinderbox/whereintheworld: not found
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 18:38, Greg Lehey wrote:
> Did you use shutdown -p? If my hypothesis is correct, it's possible
> to get this result with shutdown -h if you press the power switch as
> soon as the "System halted" message appears, but normally you'd give
> it a few seconds longer. With shutdo
Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point.
lock order reversal
1st 0xc4123858 process lock (process lock) @ ../../../kern/kern_descrip.c:2104
2nd 0xc411ee34 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ ../../../kern/kern_des
crip.c:2111
Debugger("witness_lock")
Stopped at Debugger
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Enache Adrian writes:
>I get this when I try to access for the first time a file on an ext2fs
>filesystem.
>
>VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR
Please try this patch and let me know if it helps ?
Index: ext2_vnops.c
==
Since the locking is wrong anyhow...
Index: kern_descrip.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c,v
retrieving revision 1.183
diff -u -r1.183 kern_descrip.c
--- kern_descrip.c 21 Jan 2003 20:20:48 - 1.183
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I would like to
> be able to make an SMP kernel use only one CPU. Of course I
> realize running GENERIC would only use 1 CPU but the concern is
> that the overhead assoicated with S
* Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030128 12:50]: wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I would like to
> > be able to make an SMP kernel use only one CPU. Of course I
&
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:53:49PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > > that the overhead assoicated with SMP will skew the statistics.
> > > So my question is what would be the 'best' way to make an SMP
> > > kernel only start/use CPU0?
> >
> > Yank the others ?
> >
>
> What about building
Hello,
> I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
> "torture-testing". When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
> fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
> quickly and bg fsck worked fine, except for one. I had created a large
> (>50GB) /expor
* De: Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
> * Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030128 12:50]: wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > &
Hello
FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE panics during the floppies boot with following
messages:
panic: inthand_add: Can't initialize ICU
syncing disks, buffers remaining... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy
The box have two ISA PnP cards - a NIC based on UMC UM9008/F chip and
Creative SB16 based on ViBRA16
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
> > "torture-testing". When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
> > fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
> > quick
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:02:22AM +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> Try to add hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range="1" in your
> /boot/loader.conf.local and reboot your machine.
sorry, that didn't help. same effect as before.
is there anything i can do / help with to get this card running?
thanx
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> > I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
> > "torture-testing". When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
> > fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
> > quickly and bg fsck worke
Try a make build world and see if that version of libc_r works.
It should fix the problem. joseph
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:07, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
> Charlie ROOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > root, nor a regular user. Is this a font path problem?
>
> No, it is not.
>
>
> > /usr/libexe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For example "platform sgimips" implies
> "options SGIMIPS". Below are patches to makefile glue and config(8)
> itself.
I think that using '#ifdef ' (like #ifdef PC98) is not a good
idea. If it requires, the file should be
> From: Atte Peltomaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > > If it's long enough to pause the console noticibly, the
> next thing
> > > to try is breaking to the debugger -- which might require an NMI
> > > card -- to see what code it's stuck in during the pause.
> >
> > It's noticeable - if you
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
> > > ps2 ? audio
> Enabled, Address 530, IRQ 5, DMA 3, SBAddress 220
...
> Anything else I may try?
> Thanks to all who replied!
Yes, there should be 2 DMA addresses assigned to the 'audio' device.
{0x0001630e, "CS423x-PCI"},
Hello,
> 47105 seems to be slightly different from what I saw, because my machine
> never paniced; the fsck just hung forever.
It depends. My machine hangs, there's no panic.
> > I've already written to Kirk McKusick, but it seems that he has a lot
> > of work, because I didn't get answer.
> Ok,
On 28-Jan-2003 Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-27 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: tunefs using libufs. ]
>> I'm getting some odd behavior with tunefs (5.0-CURRENT cvsupped and built
>> Sunday, Jan 26). If a filesystem, rather than an actual device, is
>>
Hi,
I've got ACPI problems. First I've got a little note:
"acpi0: AcpiGetSleepTypeData failed - AE_NOT_FOUND"
Wouldn't it be a lot more userfriendly to display:
"acpi0: Sleep mode type 1 not supported, available modes are: 0 3 4 5"
or a similar error. Is such a patch trivial to do ? If so, I'
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
> > {0x0001630e, "CS423x-PCI"}, /* CSC0100 */
unknown: can't assign resources
You've got LOTS of ISA hints specified and they're conflicting with
PNPBIOS devices.
These are the only ones that don't get setup on my system:
> * De: Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data:
> 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
>> * Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030128 12:50]:
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
> > > "torture-testing". When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
> > > fsck I experienced the
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
> Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get the
> 'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
> GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with SMP/APIC.
> I want to use the same kernel making as small a change as
> ness
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> > I don't see it listed in 5.0-RELEASE ERRATA. Several people have now
> > reported problems with background fsck and in the case Kirk as
> > original author is loaded with other work I see no justification to
> > not mention the brokenness of
Hi,
Does FreeBSD-SMP have anything equivalent to the processor_bind(2) call
on Solaris, which binds a process to a specific processor?
http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/816-0212/6m6nd4nci?a=view
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
Hello,
> However, all those boxes used 40gb drives or smaller. I'll see if I
> can't dig up some larger drives in the next week or two and try doing
> that again.
I can't transfer it to you, but can give access to a box which has 1.2 TB
online. Just tell me what do you need. (ssh or console, for
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:22:10PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> I've been trying to reproduce this bug on my desktop. This machine has 2
> 80gb disks, one of which is dedicated with one slice. So far, after 8 hard
> resets, I haven't had any problem with either the machine or bgfsck
> h
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:23:08PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> > 47105 seems to be slightly different from what I saw, because my machine
> > never paniced; the fsck just hung forever.
> It depends. My machine hangs, there's no panic.
Yes, I overlooked that in the PR when I read it first. Mine w
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:34:25PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> Following reports of problems with bgfsck during the 5.0-RC series, and
> prior to the release, I spent some time adding hard disks to machines,
> resetting without clean shutdowns, and then interrupting background fscks,
> piles of
Oleg Baranov wrote:
It looks like firewall in 5.0-RELEASE doesn't respect uid option.
I migrated from 4.7 where the following lines worked fine:
allow tcp from me to any uid 500 setup
allow udp from me to any uid 500 keep-state
I couldn't get these lines working on 5.0 (packets don't match these
Hello,
> I really don't know. I have a SV25 barebone system from Shuttle (VIA
> Twister Chipset) and an IBM deskstar 80GB IDE HD. Does that sound
> familiar to you?
Nope, mine is completely different.
It is a HP tc4100 (I think it has an Intel MOBO, but I'm not sure) with an
AHA-2940 controller an
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
>
> > Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get the
> > 'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
> > GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associa
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:34:25PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > Following reports of problems with bgfsck during the 5.0-RC series, and
> > prior to the release, I spent some time adding hard disks to machines,
> > resetting without clean shutdowns,
Dan Nelson schrieb:
In the last episode (Jan 23), Rahul Siddharthan said:
Kenneth Culver wrote:
Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave
things like this in:
options INVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT #
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
>
>> Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get
>> the
>> 'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
>> GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with
>> SMP/APIC.
>> I want to use the same kernel making as small a
Unfortunatly, due to a misunderstanding, the last KSE changes were
committed prematurely. Not prtematurely from a functional Point of View,
but prematurely from a perspective of 'checking other architectures'.
The rumour mill has been running wild on this but **AS FAR AS I KNOW**
the breakages ha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
ian Elischer writes:
>The rumour mill has been running wild on this but **AS FAR AS I KNOW**
>the breakages have been fixed, since no-one has told me directl of any
>current breakages. If you have any breakage from this commit,
>PLEASE TELL ME!
I think you sho
Hi,
I have the following scenario:
A30p <==> disk1 <==> disk2
disk1 and disk2 are identical 200GB disks in an extarnal ICE-cube case.
My dmesg output is attached.
After creating and mounting them as UFS2 filesystems under /mnt/a /mnt/b
and starting a `iozone -s 102400m -r 1024k` in parallel unde
* De: Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For example "platform sgimips" implies
> > "options SGIMIPS". Below are patche
I've only had time to do minimal testing, but no panics anymore with this
patch.
Ken
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro wrote:
> I forgot to add below changes.
>
> Please apply this patch and
> # make -f Makefile.usbdevs
>
> Cheers
>
> - sanpei
>
>
> Index: sys/dev/usb/usbdevs
> ==
Can this please be committed to or at least prepared as a patch for
RELENG_5_0? I myself consider fixing automount access to 5.0-RELEASE nfs
servers a critical bugfix, but should RE's mileage vary, I'd really like
a patch that I can apply on my server. There is also a PR open about
this which c
Hi,
> Can this please be committed to or at least prepared as a patch for
> RELENG_5_0? I myself consider fixing automount access to 5.0-RELEASE nfs
Feel free to add this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/patches/committed/patch-rpc_oldreply.diff
> servers a critical bugfix, but should RE'
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:38:19AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Enache Adrian writes:
> >I get this when I try to access for the first time a file on an ext2fs
> >filesystem.
> >
> >VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR
>
> Please try this patch and let me know if it helps ?
O
Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
Can this please be committed to or at least prepared as a patch for
RELENG_5_0? I myself consider fixing automount access to 5.0-RELEASE nfs
Feel free to add this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/patches/committed/patch-rpc_oldreply.diff
Ah, thank you ever so
As Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> > It already stopped me when accessing /dev/da0, so why try something
> > more obscure? Sorry, you've lost me.
>
> ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/geom-foot.patch
>
> Just apply it to your local source tree and get
Sorry about emailing both lists, as Im not sure which one this falls under.
It's a current machine (5.0-CURRENT) and it's a problem with a port
(net-snmp). Below is what happens:
`VM_METER' undeclared (first use in this function)
Anyone know how to fix this or a way around it?
Regards,
Nick
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:14:36PM +0100, FredBriand wrote:
>> everything seems OK, but my sound card. In the handbook they
>> say I must use the MAKEDEV script (as in Linux) but I can't
>> find it on my disk.
>
> freebsd 5.0 is using devfs(5). so device inodes are created
> automatically.
>
>
[sorry -- dropping in the middle of the thread]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> This approach is a really bad one architecturally, in my opinion. It means
> there is a lot of duplication of what may all be VERY similar, and it means
> that if we had say 5 platfo
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > I just really would like things to be clean, and abstracted, and not waste
> > anyone's time. Why should we have to duplicate so much code?
>
> I'm not sure pl
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I.
-I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica
-I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfil
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:17:49PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > > I just really would like things to be clean, and abstracted, and not waste
> > > anyone's time.
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:17:49PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> > [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to
* De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
In short, platform provides machinery for a single port of FreeBSD
which represents exactly one MACHINE_ARCH to support a numbe of
different hardware platforms - MACHIN
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
>
> In short, platform provides machinery for a single port of FreeBSD
> which represents exactly one MACHINE_ARCH to
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:09:36PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:17:49PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > > * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAI
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > But
> > that determines what is a link to, and files. that is
> > read. So that means that we need to have stubbed in both
> > and . Each of those defines th
I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Jan 27 14:00:00 CST 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EDGEMASTER
...
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad1s1a
cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0
cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers
cd0
Benno Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > * De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> > [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> >
> > In short, platform provides machinery for a single port of FreeBSD
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> > So, given that we have MACHINE_ARCH and MACHINE already to our
> > disposal, I don't get the feeling that we are in need to add
> > something else because the problem space appears 2D, not 3D.
> >
> > Right?
>
> That's what I'm
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> >
> > > So, given that we have MACHINE_ARCH and MACHINE already to our
> > > disposal, I don't get
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:04:07PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote:
> I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable.
See:
http://news.gw.com/freebsd.current/30547
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsub
Got this today... src is fresh from cvsup2
mkdep -f
pend -a-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../crypto/openssh
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../contrib/openpam/include -I
/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../libpam
/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/pam_
I'm having the same results here... i've been trying to figure out what the problem is
for a while.. i think it's just not finding idea.h... idea.h exists in some (other)
directory.. i can't tell where it WANTS to find it though, so i coudl copy it there.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:42:59PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, given that we ha
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > No, we have not established that.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Is the problem space 2D or 3D?
Define your terms better. I could argue the number of axes very
easily, and y
Hmm, well, I finally got my first actual system panic which wasn't
obviously caused by my own screwing around. On the console I have:
free inode /usr/cvs/net/64 had 0 blocks
panic: Negative bio_offset (-19038208) on bio 0xce51be28
cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100
Debugger("panic")
Stopped
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:20:13PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > > No, we have not established that.
> >
> > *sigh*
> >
> > Is the problem space 2D or 3D?
>
>
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > > > We attach lots of meaning to MACHINE. You keep missing that that
> > > > is NOT the same as the "machine" keyword.
> > >
> > > And you keep missing that I
* De: Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> Benno Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > > * De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> > >
Anyone know of a way to fix this? A lot of programs will not install (IE:
net-snmp) with the current status. I have yet to find where the location of
the file should be... =\ I have tried a couple of spots for the file to go,
yet it still fails in the same spot. =(
Regards,
Nick H.
[EMAIL PR
i think my system is building successfully now.. i did 2 things:
1.) deleted my whole src tree, and re-downloaded it
2.) cp /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/idea/idea.h /usr/src/crypto/openssh/
not sure which one fixed it, but it's been building for about 20 minutes, and i think
it's past the poi
Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Benno Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'd also like to point out that PowerPC will benefit greatly from this.
> > PowerPC platforms vary wildly in how they do various things (incl.
> > endianness in some cases) and so this provides a much cleaner mechanism
> > to select
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:04:07PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote:
> > I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable.
>
> See:
> http://news.gw.com/freebsd.current/30547
That's a "turn your head and cough" patch. It admits the code
is broken, and leaves it broken. It als
Let me know how it goes... I may wanna try that
Regards,
Nick H.
Technical Support Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please rate my performance! http://www.supportteam.net/rate.php3
Please submit all new support requests to
http://ticketmonster.hostingsupport.com/
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
-
Did same as you suggested and it still failed.
Regards,
Nick H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Utter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nick H. -- Technical Support Engineer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: make b
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:01:58PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > > > > We attach lots of meaning to MACHINE. You keep missing that that
> > > > > is NOT the same
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > > Good. What is the new paradigm?
> >
> > As explained, you have a master port, to the architecture, assume that
> > it is "mips" ok? That's /sys/mips on FreeB
Dong Lin writes:
|
| Hi, I have been running etherboot/diskless machines successfully with
| several 4.x releases. Now I have trouble bringing up 5.0 diskless x86
| machines. The same dhcp/nfs/etherboot setup works for 4.x. But the 5.0
| kernel freezes and eventually crashes without printing anyth
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:57:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> Yes, you are following me. But also, you mention that "machine"
> as implemented means what I said it means, but there is other
> precident for using it as I say. For example, BSD/OS uses
> "machine sparc" and "options SUN4M". Ne
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:57:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> >
> > Yes, you are following me. But also, you mention that "machine"
> > as implemented means wh
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:14:41PM +0200, Enache Adrian wrote:
> please add ext2fs to the modules list in src/sys/modules/Makefile.
It is already there. :-)
Just wrapped by "WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE". So you need to add that to your
/etc/make.conf.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:18, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:57:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> >
> > Yes, you are following me. But also, you mention that "machine"
> > as implemented means what I said it means, but there is other
> > precident for using it as I say. For
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:37:16PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> > but it explcitly means a location, a path. The introduction of
> > platform is more confusing. First of all it maps to MACHINE,
> > while we have the machine keyword mapping to something else.
>
> MACHINE is a cpp define and (rel
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:54:30PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> It is already there. :-)
>
> Just wrapped by "WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE". So you need to add that to your
> /etc/make.conf.
>
It's not the make.conf man page, where can we find these options?
Jiawei Ye
--
"Without the userland, the ke
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:37:16PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> >
> > > but it explcitly means a location, a path. The introduction of
> > > platform is more conf
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0800, leafy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:54:30PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > It is already there. :-)
> >
> > Just wrapped by "WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE". So you need to add that to your
> > /etc/make.conf.
> >
> It's not the make.conf man page, where can
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:56:10PM +1100, Benno Rice wrote:
> >
> > No, I see MACHINE_ARCH implied by where you run config. This seems
> > strange and I'm not completely sure it's a good thing, but
> > MACHINE_ARCH is defined in /sys/${ARCH}/include/param.h and
> > defining the architecture in the
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 17:25, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:56:10PM +1100, Benno Rice wrote:
> > >
> > > No, I see MACHINE_ARCH implied by where you run config. This seems
> > > strange and I'm not completely sure it's a good thing, but
> > > MACHINE_ARCH is defined in /sys/$
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:20:52PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> >
> > Your proposal affects FreeBSD. I'm having a constructive discussion
> > about your proposal because I like to understand your point of
> > view and tell you mine. Childish behaviour does not impress me.
> > In fact it only tells
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:20:52PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > Sorry if you find it childish to want to move on from that sort
> > of rehashing.
>
> No, I find
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:32:51PM +1100, Benno Rice wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. There's an advantage there, but see also my reply to
> > Juli about the use of "machine" to mean MACHINE_ARCH and the
> > use of "platform" to mean MACHINE. This I don't find appealing.
>
> I can see your point here, but
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:58:53PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> And no, it wasn't really bikeshedding, it just began to feel that
> it was just a matter of "but I think we should go at it from this
> angle" when really all I intended to get was whether or not my
> code was OK. I fell short ther
* De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> You see how the current approach affects other architectures if you
> look at the diff for src/sys/conf/kmod.mk. All architectures,
> including those that don't ha
98 matches
Mail list logo
